There are no weak soldiers under the strong generals, and there are no weak soldiers under the stron

There are no weak soldiers under strong generals.

What is a strong general? 1.Brave and professional.

2.Know how to make your subordinates strong.

A strong general is not only strong himself.

And know how to use people.

Put the right people in the right places so that they can make the most of their talents.

Thus making the subordinates stronger.

It is also that he is more powerful than Tan Xun Cave.

Therefore, there are no weak soldiers under the strong generals.

Another point is that strong generals must enjoy a certain reputation.

Under this powerful shroud of honor.

They are more able to thrive and develop to reach their full potential.

Serve the country and let it wither.

This world has always been a world of constant strife and war, and there have been many famous battles since ancient times, such as the Battle of Chibi in China, the Battle of Stalingrad in the Soviet Union, the defeat of Waterloo in France, and so on. These battles have produced many famous generals, and these generals have also produced many excellent generals, so people have summed up a rule, that is, "strong generals have no weak soldiers".

What is the evidence for this? It is nothing more than an example of the strength of Chinese and foreign generals in ancient and modern times. However, we should look at problems scientifically and rigorously, not one-sidedly, and use a few examples to explain the problem, but we should analyze it dialectically.

First of all, let's deny the view that there are no weak soldiers under strong generals, we deny this view, obviously we only need to cite counterexamples, there are strong generals in ancient and modern China and foreign countries who have produced weak soldiers. For example, Cao Cao during the Three Kingdoms period, who had experienced a hundred battles, could be described as a strong general, but during the Battle of Chibi, Cai Zhongcai and these two weak soldiers were sent to surrender, but Zhou Yu saw through it at a glance, and he planned to make Cao Cao fall into Huang Gai's trick. Or the Three Kingdoms, Zhuge Liang can be described as a strong general with soldiers like a god, but Zhuge Liang has no weak soldiers under him?

If there really isn't, then where does the saying "there is no general in Shu, Liao become a pioneer" come from?

Also, the weak soldiers are strong, and they can also win battles, Sun Bin is a famous military strategist in the Spring and Autumn Period, and he wrote Sun Bin The Art of War, and the soldiers of the Qi State that Sun Bin served were indeed famous for their timidity. Did Sun Bin make the soldiers of Qi become brave? No, when Sun Bin arrived in Qi State, the soldiers of Qi State are still very weak, but Sun Bin is good at using soldiers, and he can defeat the enemy with weak soldiers, so naturally Sun Bin is a strong general.

But Sun Bin is a strong general, and his subordinates are indeed a group of weak soldiers.

Secondly, let's deny the view that the strong general's subordinates are all weak soldiers, it is still the example of Sun Bin, Sun Bin went to the Qi State, if the soldiers of the Qi State are all weak and dare not go to the battlefield, the Qi State still cannot win the battle, always because of those strong and brave soldiers rushing ahead, Sun Bin can command, and the battle can go on. There are many examples of other strong generals producing strong generals, for example, Zhou Yu knows Lu Meng, Zhuge Liang knows Jiang Wei and so on.

Therefore, we can draw a conclusion, that is, strong generals may not have no weak soldiers under them. Looking at this problem dialectically, we find that the types of strong generals are different, and the soldiers under them are also different, and those who are good at soldiers, such as Liu Bang's generation, are naturally brave and fierce, everyone competes for the first, and they are not good at soldiers, and there are arrogant and arrogant people, such as Lu Bu's generation, and his subordinates are naturally cowardly and fearful, most of these strong generals are also brave and unscrupulous, and Lu Bu finally died in the hands of his own weak soldiers.

In the same way, weak generals may not be without strong soldiers. There are many examples that prove this view, so I will not repeat them all. What I want to say is that these two points of view can be applied in modern society, when we select educators, or select other talents, we should not only look at the ability of the person, how high the level is, but also see whether he has enough affinity, it is the teacher to see whether he can convince the students, and it is the talent to see whether he can unite his subordinates.

Only under such generals can there be strong soldiers, and only then can they really make some achievements and create greater value!

1.Strong generals need corresponding strength, and generally strong people are more conceited and not open-minded.

2.Powerful generals tend to rely too much on their own strength and do not pay attention to the selection of the talents of their subordinates.

3.Strong generals like to solve problems on their own, and therefore neglect the training of their subordinates.

4.A strong general will make the soldier feel dependent, and the soldier will not pay attention to his own improvement.

5.A strong general will lose the motivation for promotion, because he cannot replace his superiors, and he will be passive and slack off.