Why Capital needs to be defended

In Marx's book Capital, he analyzed in detail the operating mechanism and inherent contradictions of the capitalist economic system, and revealed the exploitation and inequality of the capitalist system. Capital is regarded as an important cornerstone of Marxist economics and is of great significance for understanding capitalist society and class struggle.

However, in the real world, the capitalist system still exists and faces various challenges and threats. In this context, proposed"Defend Capital"The slogan means to defend the principles and ideas of Marxism and insist on the importance of criticizing and analyzing the capitalist system.

The significance of defending Capital is as follows:

Inherit and carry forward Marxist thought: The purpose of defending Capital is to inherit and carry forward the theoretical heritage of Marxism, to criticize and study the capitalist economic system, and to provide ideological guidance for solving contemporary social problems.

In-depth analysis and resistance to capitalist exploitation and inequality: By delving into the theories and perspectives in Capital, we can better understand the problems of exploitation and inequality in the capitalist system and strive to change and solve them.

Insist on the direction of socialism and the class struggle: Defending Capital means adhering to the direction of socialism and acknowledging the existence and importance of the class struggle between capitalism and socialism. By studying and interpreting Capital, we can contribute to the struggle for socialism and the building of a more just and equal society.

To sum up, the purpose of defending Capital is to inherit and carry forward the theoretical heritage of Marxism, to deeply analyze and resist capitalist exploitation and inequality, and to adhere to the direction of socialism and class struggle. This is an important task for upholding the principles of Marxism in contemporary society.

We need to sublimate from the era of Capital to defend Capital, mainly because there are some problems in the current society, which are closely related to the capitalist system and its inherent contradictions revealed by Capital.

First of all, with the development of globalization and market economy, the capitalist system has been widely applied and developed on a global scale. However, this system also brings a series of problems, such as the widening gap between the rich and the poor, the unfair distribution of resources, and environmental pollution. These questions require us to re-examine the nature and limitations of the capitalist system revealed in Capital in order to seek a more rational and sustainable social system.

Second, there are some voices attacking and denying Capital in the current society, and these voices are mainly from some anti-capitalist forces. These people try to overthrow the capitalist system by denying Capital, but they often ignore the inherent contradictions and crises of the capitalist system revealed by Capital. Therefore, we need to defend Capital in order to maintain its status and value as a classic of the social sciences.

Finally, defending Capital is also a responsibility and responsibility to ourselves. As contemporary people, we need to seriously think about and study the issues revealed by Capital in order to better understand and respond to various challenges and problems in current society. Only through the in-depth study and understanding of Capital can we better promote social progress and development.

Not exactly. Adhering to the principle of Juche logic is a way of thinking and research method, emphasizing rational thinking and logical analysis, with the goal of constructing a rigorous thinking system with a strong foundation. The defense of Capital refers to the study, inheritance, and expansion of the Marxist classic Das Kapital, so as to maintain and develop the Marxist theoretical system.

The purpose of adhering to the principle of Juche logic is to avoid one-sided and illogical ways of thinking and to improve the ability of rational analysis and dialectical thinking. This way of thinking is of great significance in the study of Capital, which can help readers better understand, analyze and apply the theoretical content of the work, and promote in-depth thinking and solution of practical problems.

However, the defense of Capital involves more attention, research, and inheritance of this work. In the face of doubts and criticisms from ignorant academic schools, political views, and the background of the times, adhering to the stance of defending Capital can maintain, clarify and develop the Marxist ideological system, and promote its application and development.

Capital comes from the West, and its cultural background, economic development mode, economic foundation, etc., are very different from those in the East, and I think there are many problems in choosing it as a breakthrough.

The classics are highly abstract and summarized on a large number of cultural backgrounds and economic phenomena, and the differences in regions and cultures are no longer obvious, and the basis for "Oriental Economics" is very weak.

People attach great importance to the foundation of the economy, from the motive force of production, the generation of exchange, the source of value and its distribution mode, to the productive forces and production relations, the economic base and superstructure, etc., they have indeed played a very good role in promoting the solution of economic problems in the long history, but in the post-industrial era, this role is gradually declining.

Capital explains the mechanism of the economic crisis, and people use it to add more state intervention, and it does have the effect of reversing the economic decline. However, the judgment made by "Capital" has not been wrong, the economic crisis still exists, but there is a certain difference in the length of time and the size of the scope, and no matter how powerful the country, including today's socialism, the means of intervention have reached the extreme, but the economic crisis still cannot be eliminated. In this regard, no matter how much he criticizes Capital, it is difficult to shake his position.

The question of why the state intervenes in the economy and its role in regulating and controlling the economy is becoming weaker and weaker. Economics can't explain it, and it can't solve it, so naturally it will decline. Economics that doesn't work is just a fig leaf, theories are flying all over the place, and people are still living in misery.

The basis of economics is that in the period when the commodity economy was underdeveloped, everything was lacking, and as long as it was produced, someone would buy it, so it developed the characteristics of economists who were light on "demand". It's just that the replication ability of machines is too strong, and there are too many people producing the same thing, which leads to an economic crisis, but the world is still in short supply, so there is a relative and absolute surplus.

The world has developed to this day, and commodities are extremely rich, not only in terms of quantity and scale, but also in terms of substitution, the same type, and trade-offs.

In the face of such a rich world of flowers, how do consumers recognize? It's almost a blank slate. What does economics offer to the state other than the troika?

What is provided to enterprises in addition to technology, cost, quality and service? Nothing.

We talk about cultural differences, geographical environment differences, and climate differences, all of which can have an impact on the economic activities of people within a specific range, and the economy developed on this basis does have their characteristics. But this difference is manifested first in the impact on demand, and secondly in the impact on production through demand. In other words, there is a layer in the middle, and there is no way to collide.

Choosing cultural differences as a breakthrough has a limited effect on supply, but has a very large impact on demand, and going deeper may be the right way for development economics.

To grasp the method of political economy with the logic of subjectivity, we can start from the following aspects:

1.Determine the object of study: Political economy is a discipline that studies the interaction between economics and politics, so it is first necessary to determine whether the subject of research is economics or politics, or the relationship between the two. Identifying the subject of the study helps to clarify the focus of the analysis and research.

2.Analyze the logical relationships of the subject: The logic of the subject focuses on the attributes, relationships, and rules of things.

In the study of political economy, we can analyze the logical relationship between economic and political subjects, such as the influence of politics on the economy, the influence of the economy on politics, and the relationship between the two mutual constraints and interdependence. This helps to understand and explain important issues in political economy.

3.Reveal the dynamic changes of the subject: The logic of the subject is not only concerned with static properties and relationships, but also with the dynamic changes of things.

In the study of political economy, it is possible to reveal the evolution and development trend in political economy by analyzing the development and changes of economic and political subjects, such as the evolution of economic systems and political forces.

4.Consider the subject's goals and motives: The logic of the subject also focuses on the goals and motivations of things.

When studying political economy, it is necessary to analyze the goals and motivations of economic and political agents, such as the pursuit of profits by economic agents and the power struggle of political agents. This contributes to the understanding of behavior and decision-making in political economy.

Through the above methods, we can grasp political economy with subject logic, deeply understand the relationship between economy and politics, and reveal the laws and dynamic changes in it. This helps us to better understand and analyze important issues in political economy and provides theoretical guidance for practice.

ok As rotten Kuastho Jobs, I would think that your decision-making lacks innovation and uniqueness. You should pay more attention to the innovation of technology and products, as well as the improvement of user experience. At the same time, you need to pay more attention to team building and leadership development to drive the company's growth and innovation.

As Elon Musk, I think you should pay more attention to long-term planning for the future and the development of technology. You need to invest more resources in research and development in the energy sector and actively promote the use of renewable energy. In addition, you should pay more attention to the concept of environmental protection and sustainable development.

As Jack Ma, I think you need to focus more on marketing and branding. You should actively expand overseas markets and cooperate with world-renowned brands. At the same time, you also need to strengthen cooperation with ** and related institutions to promote the development and regulation of e-commerce.

As Plato, I think you need to focus more on rational thinking and philosophical thinking. You should think about more in-depth questions and explore the nature of human beings and the truth of society. At the same time, you also need to pay more attention to the development of education and culture in order to improve the quality and wisdom of the whole society.

As Ray Dalio, I think you need to pay more attention to risk management and investment strategy. You should establish a scientific investment model, and conduct risk analysis and asset allocation. At the same time, you also need to strengthen your research on the market and the economy to grasp investment opportunities and market trends.

As a Master of Huineng, I think you need to pay more attention to inner peace and the meaning of life. You should cultivate inner wisdom and compassion to achieve true happiness and joy. At the same time, you also need to pay attention to social welfare and charitable activities to give back to society and benefit others.

In short, each director has their own unique perspective and advice, and you can draw from the experience and wisdom to consider a variety of factors to make the best decision.

Defend Capital, go home, go back to history, go back to China, economics or science!

Our slogan: to control science with literature, to drive science with history, to work hard, to learn Marxism and Chinese economics. And staring.

Capital is a cornerstone of the study of political economy in China. The year 2017 marks the 150th anniversary of the first edition of Capital, and a wave of "hot research on Capital" has been set off in China. Perhaps the most valuable point is that by restoring Marx's academic spirit, we can achieve the research purpose of "using it for my own use"!

Because it's Marx's work.

Capital is both a science and an art. The clarion call of the "new era" calls for a practical theoretical reading of reality, and to this end, promoting "Capital in the New Era" will be a "new positioning" for the study of Marx's Capital.

At present, the domestic academic system of Capital can be divided into the following types: the political version of Capital, the philosophical version of Capital, the mathematical version of Capital, and the cultural version of Capital.

The main purpose of the revision of "Defending Capital" is to take the research of "cultural version of Capital" as the guide, taking into account the other three categories.

Capital is a book published by the People's Publishing House in 2004 by Karl Marx. The full name is Capital and Critique of Political Economy, which is an important encyclopedia of Marxism and the pinnacle of Marx's study of capitalist social and economic forms. In this work, guided by the basic ideas of historical materialism, Marx revealed the laws of the development of capitalist society through a profound analysis of the capitalist mode of production, so that the historical materialism has been scientifically verified and further enriched and developed.