How about the Canon EOS 7D

Updated on number 2024-03-22
4 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It's good, it's the first time I bought something so expensive online, the body is good, but there is ash in front of the lens. Blow-bw overcame haha. Today, I saw that it had risen by 300+ hahahaha, and I earned it.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Recommended by netizens:

    I bought the dismantling 7D in September 2010, spent 9300 yuan, and gave the 500D in my hand to my granddaughter. Equipped with 15-85 heads, 4500 yuan at the time, I can't put it down in my hand, the focus is fast, I took a lot of flower landscape photos, sharpness can be, no vignetting, and now I bought 70-200 is Xiaoxiaobai, like a tiger with wings, 7D and Xiaoxiaobai are really a good match, and a perfect match. **Outstanding delicateness.

    After using it for a while, I feel that the overall performance of this camera is very good, which is very suitable for friends who want to buy a high-quality camera.

    The official ** is also very [tempting] It is recommended to check it out.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The differences are described below:

    EOS7 was produced in 2000, with many focus points and diopter adjustment, and the EOS7 battery is cheap (count one EOS7 about 600g). EOS7 is 35-zone metering;

    EOS7E is not very different in focus points, and the amateur pat is enough, and it realizes small and lightweight air lighting.

    Since its establishment in 1937, Canon is a global leader in the production of imaging and information products, and has expanded its business to various fields through unremitting efforts over the years.

    Canon's product lineup is distributed in three main areas: personal products, office equipment and industrial equipment, and its main products include cameras and lenses, digital cameras, printers, copiers, fax machines, scanners, broadcasting equipment, medical equipment and semiconductor production equipment.

    Headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, Canon has four regional sales headquarters in the Americas, Europe, Asia and Japan, and has 200 subsidiaries around the world and employs more than 100,000 people.

    On March 9, 2016, Toshiba Corporation of Japan held a meeting of the board of directors of Dou Weikuan and finally decided to give its Toshiba Medical System Co., Ltd. to Canon Inc., and Canon Inc. proposed an acquisition of 700 billion yen (about 40.5 billion yuan).

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Both the Canon EOS R7 and EOS 90D are excellent cameras, but they differ in their design and purpose. Here's a comparison between the two and where to use them:

    Shooting type: The EOS R7 is a full-frame mirrorless camera that is suitable for professional photographers, high-end users, and those who want better image quality. The EOS 90D is a DSLR camera in APS-C format for amateur photographers who want to shoot sports, wildlife, or long-range shots.

    Resolution: The EOS R7 has a resolution of up to 10,000 pixels, compared to the EOS 90D, which is slightly lower at around 32.6 million pixels, so the EOS R7 is superior when it comes to detail, and is suitable for shooting situations that require higher resolution.

    Image stabilization: The EOS R7 is equipped with a built-in 5-axis image stabilization system that reduces the amount of shake that occurs when shooting with a handheld camera. The EOS 90D, on the other hand, does not have a built-in stabilization system.

    **: The EOS R7 is more expensive because it is a full-frame mirrorless camera, while the EOS 90D costs less. Therefore, in cases where budget constraints are high, the EOS 90D is a more budget-friendly option.

    If you are a high-end user or a professional photographer who needs better image quality and a wider field of view, it is recommended to choose the Canon EOS R7 camera. And if you're an amateur photographer, shooting sports, wildlife, or shooting long distances, we recommend the Canon EOS 90D camera, which is suitable for everyday shooting and offers better value for money.

Related questions
10 answers2024-03-22

Merit. 1.The imaging quality is high, although the number of diagonal points is not much, but they are all relatively accurate, especially the ** focus point, which is an eight-way double cross, with high focusing accuracy, and the tracking and shooting of moving objects is very clear. >>>More

8 answers2024-03-22

Pros: Good image quality with a combination of macro and telephoto and image stabilization. >>>More

6 answers2024-03-22

Both of them are not very good, especially the SX30 changed the AA battery used in the original telephoto series, using a "professional lithium battery", IXUS1000 can only use lithium battery because of the small body, think about it! A few years later, the battery life to the original model of the battery is gone, no matter how good the camera will become a waste, there are two early digital cameras around me because they can't match the battery can only be discarded, during which they are matched with one of them, but it will be finished in less than a year (it can be seen that the quality of the substitute is extremely poor), AA battery (can be replaced by 5 nickel-metal hydride rechargeable battery) is widely used everywhere, I believe that in recent decades or even hundreds of years will not be eliminated, as long as the camera is not broken, the camera with AA battery will continue to be used as long as the camera is not broken.

8 answers2024-03-22

This new machine is very good, I regret that I bought the SX1IS, it is more expensive than the SX20 by 1000 oceans, and the function is similar to the SX20. The night scene it shoots is very good, but its only drawback is that the LCD screen sometimes has bad pixels, the first SX1is I bought was tossed for 2 months and 7 months and 7 days because of the LCD dead pixel problem, Canon. >>>More

3 answers2024-03-22

Hello! The Canon IXUS 310 HS is equipped with a back-illuminated CMOS sensor with excellent imaging results. >>>More