Asking for help I am anxious for debate materials The pursuit of efficiency necessarily comes at the

What you're doing now is pursuing efficiency at the expense of equality.

From the perspective of the relationship between efficiency and equality, the effective distribution of social resources requires that efficiency inevitably sacrifice equality. Because resources are limited.

Therefore, we must put the limited sources of information into the hands of producers who can create maximum efficiency, so as to drive social, economic and political development. Although it will inevitably lead to inequality in the distribution of resources, the maximum efficiency that this inequality will be exchanged for better development.

2. Promote the sustainable development of productivity.

We must be honest and insist that there is a disparity in income. Because the income inequality reflected in the difference between the high and low efficiency of individual workers is to promote their work efficiency.

The main motivator. Judging from the development practice of some countries.

Initial allocation. It accounts for 80 to 90 per cent of the income of the population, while redistribution accounts for only 10 to 20 per cent. The primary distribution determines the level of people's income, and even in the United States, where the economy is highly developed and the welfare policy is relatively perfect, in 2000, the bottom 20 households received the primary distribution.

The top 20 households get income, which shows that in following the market to take a wide economy.

In the case of regularity, in the case of regulating primary distribution and redistribution, efficiency must be sacrificed to equality.

3. From the perspective of the objective law of development, the development of human society.

The development process of human beings from an agricultural society and industrial society to today's information-based society has been accompanied by the improvement of productivity, that is, the improvement of efficiency. Each of these improvements will contribute to economic growth and political systems.

of perfection. Even though there are various inequalities, such as people's different incomes and social status, human beings are still developing in the direction of better use of resources and improving efficiency, which shows that this is in line with us.

Looking back at history, in the history of human civilization for thousands of years, equality and efficiency have mostly shown the nature of separation and even opposition. Primitive society.

It is an egalitarian society, but it is inefficient, private ownership.

It is the origin of inequality, but the transition from primitive society to private ownership is a great historical advance; Socialism has enabled equality, but it has been plagued by problems of efficiency. Equality and efficiency are like fish and bear's paws in the course of history, and they cannot be both.

You don't have to sacrifice fairness:

Efficiency is a kind of speed of doing things, and fairness is a kind of criterion for doing things. You can have both. Efficiency can include many aspects, such as: handling things, producing products, etc. Correspondingly, the scope of equity can also be expanded).

Focusing on efficiency can promote production and contribute to the progress of society. Could it be that the previous clothes were woven with looms, which were inefficient; Is it unfair that the current mechanized production of clothes has increased productivity? In that case, why don't those who pursue fairness put a loom in their own home and give themselves only clothes?

The purpose of laws and regulations is also to be fair and just, so why not enact a special rule to ensure efficiency and use inefficient tools?

To sacrifice fairness:

Main line: With efficiency, you can't do things like the previous standards. As the so-called fish and bear's paws cannot be both.

For example, the production workshop produces 20 products a day according to the original working standard, and one day it has to produce 40 products in order to catch up with the goods. The quality requirements of the products in these four times must not be as good as the previous standard of 20 pieces per day! Come on!

Positive: It is necessary for the national policy to focus on efficiency in the first distribution and fairness in the second distribution.

Opposite: Efficiency and fairness go hand in hand.

Focus on efficiency There is no need to sacrifice fairness.

Efficiency and fairness are two concepts in the field, and the two are not absolute opposites, and there is no need for us to abandon fairness in pursuit of efficiency.