Comrades, who knows the performance comparison of the Thunder fighter and the F16?

The J-10 is definitely stronger than the Thunder! The maximum Mach of the Thunder is below, the maximum climb is below 20,000 meters, and the general 3rd generation fighter is easy to reach the practical double 2, that is, the maximum speed is above, and the maximum climb is above 20,000 meters, so to speak, the Thunder has barely reached the level of the 3rd generation fighter, but it also has 70% of the combat effectiveness of the American F16 fighter, and the J-10 is developed by more than 20 years of research, all of which use the most advanced technology, the maneuverability is better than that of the Su-27, and the combat capability is stronger than that of the F16A B, It is possible to perform a wide range of tasks, and the overall technology has reached the level of the 90s of the last century internationally! Even in today's world, it is very advanced!

The F-16 should be a 3rd generation fighter, while the Thunder is only 2 and a half generations.

Wingspan: m:

Length: m (single-seater) m (two-seater).

Height: m: Main track: m:

Front main track: m:

Normal take-off weight: 9100 kg:

Maximum take-off weight: 12700 kg:

Plug-in capacity: 3800 kg:

Fuel inside: 2300 liters:

Maximum Mach number::

Practical ceiling: 16500 meters:

Take-off and run distance: 450 meters:

Landing Run Distance: 700 meters:

Range: 2500 km:

Limit overload: 8g

1. The stealth performance of the Thunder Dragon is better, because of the use of a clam-type air intake, the radar reflection area is reduced 2, and the radar can detect a longer distance in the head-on state.

3. The cost is low, and combat effectiveness can be formed in a relatively short time.

The FC-1 "Thunder" fighter was developed as a lightweight, simple, and inexpensive alternative to the MiG-21 and Jian-7, and also emphasized the technical characteristics of lightness, simplicity, and cheapness.

"Xiaolong" tries to adopt mature technology in basic technology to reduce technical risks and R&D costs, but selectively adopts some advanced technologies, such as DSI inlet duct, wing-body fusion, etc. And taking advantage of the latecomer, the technical level and flight performance surpassed the early third-generation fighters. From the start, "Thunder" has had excellent close-quarters fighting ability.

After being equipped with the SD-10 medium-range air-to-air missile, the "Thunder" also has excellent over-the-horizon air combat capabilities.

According to reports, in the Pakistan Air Force's many adversarial combat exercises with the F-16, the "Thunder" can consistently detect and detect the enemy first, and its performance exceeds that of the F-16A Block15 OCU and is close to the more advanced F-16C Block52. Due to the insufficient number of F-16C Block 52s in the Pakistan Air Force, the "Thunder" (JF-17 "Thunderbolt") has become the de facto workhorse of air combat.

There is definitely no comparison with the F16CD, that is something that can only be compared with the J-10. But it should be a fight with F16AB, after all, F16AB is 30 years ago, avionics equipment is very old, no matter how bad the Thunder Dragon is, it is the latest to come out, and the electronic equipment is definitely much stronger than F16AB.

It depends on what model you compare, the early model of the Thunder Dragon can't beat the F16 of the same period, but the Thunder Dragon Block 2, the F16 early model should be about the same, if it's the Thunder Dragon Block 3, then it's not necessarily, the Thunder Dragon Block 3, the fourth generation of the equipment is pushed, that is the new domestic engine of the Fortune 31, the power is not weak, and the new active phased array radar equipped with the Thunder Dragon Block 3, which model of the pomegranate can correspond, it is hard to say.

No Thunder is a quasi-third-generation fighter.

The F16 is an authentic third-generation fighter, and the later modification is a third-and-a-half-generation fighter (European and American standards, with F22 as the fourth generation).

There is no comparison in performance, the difference is too big, and there is only an advantage in the first place.

Without advantages, the Thunder is an ultralight fighter designed for Pakistan and other third world countries. In addition to its late development, it has adopted many new fourth-generation aircraft and adopted new technologies, such as DSI air intakes, etc., which has no advantages over other fourth-generation aircraft. The disadvantages are obvious, insufficient engine thrust, airborne radar performance, avionics system, bomb load, and range cannot be compared with the F-16.

So Pakistan wants to buy J-10

Incomparable.

The J10B, which is one level higher than the Thunder, is also slightly better than the F16a at mostEarly models of the 80s and 90s of the last century.

There is a certain gap with the later models of the F16.

The Thunder is a low-end version and the F16 are not comparable in any way and something of a different tier should not be compared.

Basically it is certain that there is no comparison, real combat test, "generation difference". All of them are insurmountable, not to mention that the development of the Thunder itself has a certain political and economic purpose. So the overall gap is obvious, if you have to take it out, then the early model of the F-16A B should be slightly inferior in the avionics system, coupled with the smaller size of the Thunder, which determines the high maneuverability, so these are the advantages of the Thunder, plus relatively cheap and reasonable **.

More and more countries are ready to procure.

1. The stealth performance of the Thunder is better, because of the use of a clam-type air intake, so the radar reflection area is reduced.

2. The radar can detect a longer distance in the head-on state.

3. The cost is low, and combat effectiveness can be formed in a relatively short time.

There are no advantages, there are more f16 versions, the early versions have long been eliminated, and the later versions are still quite strong.

Fighting a war is not just a matter of a fighter plane, it is an integrated combat system.

Pakistan can win with this F16 against India, because this is a joint research and development between Pakistan and China, and all aspects of product performance are understood, but China can't win with this F16 against the United States, because of the overall electronic countermeasures, logistics, and combat in all aspects of the comprehensive results.

Y on the first floor is a serious nonsense.

The F16 has a B C D E F I type, depending on which model. The early A B type can only dominate the air, lacks ground and cannot fire medium-range bombs, and it is certainly not as good as the Thunder, but the C Dblock50 52 batch, E F60 I70 is better than J10. The JF-17 was originally a low-grade light machine, and the potential for improvement was also small.

To be honest, this model has no future, no matter how cheap it is, it is a bare metal 3000W, poor countries must not be able to afford it, rich countries have long bought F16 and SU30, even if you sell J10, others don't want it. At the same price, it is better to buy a second-hand F16C D, the range, thrust ratio, mount life, multi-functional ability, etc. are far better than the Thunder, ** It is cheaper than the Thunder, and it has been combated. And the engines of the Thunder and J10 are also subject to Russia.

The reason why the minibus wants Xiaolong is because of the production line, but it is still looking for second-hand F16C D all over the world, because the United States does not even sell second-hand him. In the low-end market of the third-generation machine, JAS39, MiG-29 and second-hand F16 are the three major opponents that are difficult for the Thunder Dragon Chicken Ten to bypass, and the quality and cost performance are not comparable to this, you see that JAS39 has more users than the Thunder Dragon, and the sales volume is also more than the Thunder of the minibus, not to mention the MiG29. As for the new F16 and Shuangfeng, they are high-end goods, so I won't compare them.

The Thunder Dragon fighter is a third-generation fighter, and the Thunder Dragon fighter is an all-weather, single-engine, single-seat, light and multi-purpose third-generation fighter with strong air-to-ground combat capabilities. The maximum speed of the Thunder fighter is Mach 2, and the combat ceiling is 55,000 feet (about 10,000 meters).

The Thunder Dragon fighter is an advanced multi-purpose light third-generation fighter jointly developed and produced by AVIC and the Pakistan Air Force in line with the principle of "joint investment, joint development, shared risks and shared benefits".