How to write the defense draft of the opposing party s three defenses, and how to write the defense

The following points need to be clarified in the preparation of the defense draft of the opposing party's three defenses:

1.Clarify the topic and viewpoint of the positive side: know the proposition and basis of the positive side, as well as the main points of the main points of the positive argument.

2.Determine the opposing party's views and basis: Clarify the opposing party's views and basis, as well as the reasons to support them, based on the argument and the arguments of the positive side.

3.Prepare for rebuttal and attack: According to the content of the speeches of the three arguments of the positive side and the views of the opposing side, prepare the ideas of rebuttal and attack, including specific examples, data, facts, etc.

4.Organize language and expression: Organize your argument in clear, concise, and logical language that is easy for judges and listeners to understand, while paying attention to the speed, intonation, and volume of speech.

The following is an example of a three-sided defense draft:

Dear judges, debaters and audiences:

Today's debate topic is "Should schools implement a school uniform system", and the positive side believes that the school uniform system can improve the school's image and students' morality. However, we believe that the uniform system should not be implemented because its disadvantages far outweigh the benefits.

First of all, I would like to point out a misconception that the school uniform system does not improve the image of the school. In fact, the negative impact of the school uniform system on schools is multifaceted.

Under the school uniform system, students wearing the same clothes can easily make people feel monotonous and boring, and even have a negative impact on the school's image. In addition, due to financial constraints, some families may not be able to afford the cost of school uniforms, which can lead to low self-esteem among students and negatively affect the image of the school.

Secondly, we believe that the uniform system does not improve the moral character of students. Moral improvement is a complex process that cannot be achieved by relying solely on the school uniform system. The uniform system is only a formal change and does not solve the fundamental problem.

In addition, the school uniform system may also suppress the individuality of students and affect the healthy growth of students. We should respect the development of students' personalities and cultivate students' moral character through guidance and education.

We believe that the disadvantages of the uniform system far outweigh the benefits. First of all, because students are in the period of growth and development, wearing school uniforms may have a negative impact on students' physical development. In addition, the school uniform system may also increase the negative impact of students' comparison psychology and consumption concept.

To sum up, we insist on the point that schools should not implement a uniform system. Through the above analysis, it can be seen that the school uniform system not only fails to improve the image of the school and the moral character of students, but also may have a negative impact on the physical and mental health of students.

On the debate on whether you can lie, how to refute the three arguments.

Square: 1If a person often has lies in his mouth to deceive others, over time, he will lose people's trust.

Zi said: "People have no faith, and they don't know what they can do." "I think that if people don't be trustworthy, they will have no place in society and they will not be able to do anything.

"Lies" are called "lies" because they are false, untrue, and deceitful words. 2.The "lie" itself is dark, and the white lie itself is falsehood.

Although he took off the cheongsam worn by the beggar, he still could not escape the essence of his lie, and a lie meant deception, and thus hindered integrity. The starting point of a white lie is good, but often once this lie is exposed, the damage to the other party will be deeper. 3.

In my opinion, distrusting others is not only irresponsible to oneself, but also disrespectful to others, and even to others, causing losses to the interests of the collective. The most important thing is to lose the trust of others. 4.

Another point is that if you tell a lie, it may be used many more lies to round that lie, and there is a high probability that lying becomes a habit, lying, it's like a snowball, it will get bigger and bigger. Opposite: 1

White lies are beautiful, when we are modestly ripping small lies for the happiness and hope of others.

The three debates are mainly responsible for attacking and debating freely, and of course they must be very clear about their own arguments, that is, their own positions. No matter what angle you want to write your argument, you need to focus on your own argument.

First of all, you need to make clear that the core of your point of view is that the lobby manager is more important than the account manager, and then find the corresponding information around this point to support your point of view. Then, by negotiating with teammates, find out a better point of argument, and conduct careful cooperative reasoning to avoid logical loopholes. You can also speculate on their thinking from the perspective of the opposite side, and deal with it in advance.

In this way, a three-defense argument came out.

As people get older, they take on more and more responsibilities. Such as supporting parents, raising children, and so on. If you have more responsibilities, you will have to think more about doing things and being a person, and you can't do what you want.

The draft of the debate against the argument is written as follows:

1. Theoretical traceability, explanation of concepts, at this time we need the guidance or corroboration of theory, give full play to the role of theory in practice, combine theory with debate, and play the role of throwing bricks and leading to the source of the truth. But to be clear, theory covers not only the universally accepted theorems and laws, but also the famous police bags of politicians, writers, and democrats. <>

2. In the value of reality, the establishment of the positions of the two sides, the theories of all parties have given evidence, and the important position in the opening chapter is the affirmation and elaboration of the value of the position, if there is no value of his own, the position will appear weak, and the attack will appear weak. Therefore, it is important to highlight the value of the position.

3. Compare the merits, there are differences in the positions of the two sides of the debate, and there is naturally a kind of quick observation. The basic theory contains more than just the laws we agree on, the fundamental laws. Arguments about the differences in each other's views, comparisons can highlight the key priorities, and can express whether there is existence, and whether it should be applied or not.

Only by comparing can we better demonstrate the importance of question types. Find our strengths in the link of comparing each other's points of view, and learn from each other's strengths. You can analyze the use value and principle to compare the advantages of your own point of view or the disadvantages of the other party.

4. Draw conclusions and conclude the debate.

Benefits of Debate Tournaments:

Thinking skills are improved. By participating in the debate competition, you can see the problem more deeply, no longer stay on the superficial surface, you can see the deeper things of the problem, and you can see the problem from multiple angles. The language is more artistic.

After participating in several debate competitions, many students have gone from being speechless on the court at the beginning to witty remarks, quoting scriptures, and often using famous quotes and rhetorical devices.

The draft of the three debates is written as follows:

1. The phenomenon level, also known as the factual level problem. This kind of question is very easy to resonate with the audience, and it is easy to be brilliant and effective if it is asked well. However, it should be noted that it is not possible to deviate from the debate by making a new cave, which will have a negative effect.

2. The theoretical level, also known as the argument level. That is, the question of extending one's own argument and refuting the opponent's argument. This kind of question, the direct question should be asked sharply, the curved question should be asked cleverly, the rhetorical question should be asked in a timely manner, and the wit of forcing the question to be asked will have the effect of making the other party bad and unavoidable.

3. The value level, also known as the social effect level. That is, to extend the other party's arguments and positions, and extend its effect from the level of value and social effect to see whether it is convincing and can stand. This kind of problem can expand the battlefield of free debate and create passivity for the other party, and it is also an important aspect of winning the approval of the audience and judges.

If the argument is not good for the side, it should be used sparingly, so as not to lift a stone and hit oneself in the foot.

Among these three types of issues, factual issues can include historical events, actual facts, national facts, numerical facts, etc.; In addition to the arguments in the position, the theoretical problems can also be extended to the axiomatic and philosophical levels.