Debate Pros and Cons of High Tech In a hurry, the reward for a good answer is 100 10

We just had this debate today.

Benefit. Because, without technology, China may still be in a state of being bullied by other countries; China now has more than 100 countries with diplomatic relations, but also because other countries fancy our science and technology, but also because of China's national defense, and the vast majority of national defense is also China's independent research and development of .........

It's a philosophical question :

The reason why science is developing is that human beings are progressing, and this is a good thing that should be used correctly. On the contrary, if you want to develop, you will produce things that conflict with development, such as the environment, ****, etc., depending on how you use it and where you use it. This can also be said to be a contradiction.

--Original. Absorb everyone's opinions.

The way of life of the class, 200,000 years ago compared to 100,000 years ago

Of course, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, the rapid development of science and technology, our daily life is accompanied by technology products everywhere, we use mobile phones, computers, including the skyscraper you are in now, these are not all scientific and technological products, imagine that if there is no electric light invented by Edison, then the night is pitch black, people have half of the time to do nothing, wasted, no cars, trains, planes, ships, you want to eat a fresh green vegetable in winter, and when it is shipped from the south, isn't it all rotten, Don't say you can grow in a greenhouse, isn't that also an accessory product of technology! Technology is not only "high" technology such as space shuttles, rockets, atomic bombs, etc., but also has a side that is close to life. If the development of science and technology really does more harm than good, will the country still advocate the rejuvenation of the country through science and technology?

If it really does more harm than good, and no longer develops science and technology, China will not be as backward and beaten as the Qing Dynasty! If it really does more harm than good, then why are you surrounded by tech ancillary products! The reason why human society has grown and prospered now is not the development of society driven by science and technology.

If you say that the development of science and technology has brought environmental pollution and endangered human health, it can only mean that the development of science and technology has not been completely removed, so we must develop science and technology until all the *** completely disappears. If you say that the Internet pollutes people's eyes, but why do you say that computers should start from the baby! That is, to tell us that there are things we want in the network, and those bad things on the network are not the fault of technology, but the fault of people!

If you don't put it on, he won't synthesize it himself! Don't say that technology brings this bad and that bad! Isn't that what people do to break the law and make huge profits?

When we say that the development of science and technology has brought us a lot of drawbacks, then we must seriously think about whether the people who use it have a clear conscience! Don't blame all the mistakes on technological development!

There are pros and cons to each other, such as ***: it is convenient to use it to transport goods, but people on the ground feel very noisy (noise pollution): the plane used for the performance:

So that the performance is no longer monotonous, but there is too much smoke coming out. Car: Traveling long distances is time-saving and labor-saving.

It emits exhaust fumes. So, there are pros and cons to each.

We all agree that the benefits of scientific and technological development outweigh the disadvantages.