In Defense of Capital, the first chapter of the book and the main thrust of the scholarship

Chapter 1 Capital: Is it "Realistic History" or "Realistic History" Critique? A critique of The History of Reality: The Theory of Existence in Capital.

Starting in this particular way, purely for the sake of a working wedge. Faith is not beautiful, good words are not believed. Argument is an unbeautiful process, and discussion is to guide this process, which is called subjective criticism.

This is the beginning of any kind of construction, and Chinese economics is no exception. Professor Sun Zhengyu also holds a conscious critical view of practice, one of which is this. Second, the good do not argue, and the debater is not good.

It is able to learn, interrogate, think carefully, discern, and act. Therefore, those who know do not know, and those who do not know. Third, any author, because of his or her voice for history and the objective world, must be able to keep in mind:

There is Buddha learning, learning Buddha ability, Buddha cuo also; There is a Buddha to discern, a Buddha to distinguish, and a Buddha to be cuo. Abide by the motto: know, know, know, know.

And to achieve the true realm of "one person can do it, one hundred of oneself, ten people can do it, and one thousand of oneself". The so-called: If you can do this, although you are stupid, you will be clear, and if you are soft, you will be strong.

This language is also a precursor to production. Therefore, the "Preface to the Pavilion of King Teng" has clouds: every word is endowed, and the four rhymes are complete, please sprinkle the Pan River, and each pour the land and sea clouds.

Mr. Yu Dafu also wrote: The city is full of wind and rain and the sun is approaching, and he wants to make a Zheng note for Pan Shi.

Inscription. Source: Defending Capital

Edition: 2014-11

Listed Database "In Defense of Capital" line reading.

The so-called four histories of "Defending Capital" refer to the structure of the four parts and six chapters of the work, which are 1+19, that is, written in the front and the main text of the nineteen chapters.

The full title of the book is "Defending Capital - Outline of the Theory of Economic Form Society" (Social Science Academic Edition, 2014 edition).

Four-part structure: Part 1 Action Context: Critical Construction Overview

Part 2: The Theoretical Basis of Economic Forms: Subjective Criticism of Social History, Critical Forms, and Systematic Forms

Part 3: Economic Forms, Social Theory and Construction: Objective Criticism of Social Institutions, Objective Logic, Subjective Logical Forms

Part 4 The Application of Social Theory of Economic Forms: Economic Summary and Ending Historical Thought Forms

Professor Huang Ji, like many vulgar economists, is a logical worker, despite his knowledge of history.

Why is this so, it is to advocate the ideology of mainstream Western economics through the technique of "de-equestrian ideology"!!

At the same time, Professor Huang Ji is a typical Chinese version of a vulgar economist.

The vulgar economist is two-sided, the good side, easy to understand, simple to understand,—— this is his usual trick to attack and defend the author of Capital...

The bad side is superficial, reactionary, flickering, conciliationism, in the words of Mr. Lei, reversing black and white, in the words of qi509: referring to the deer as a horse.

We're also the people who go to your unit**.

Let us know more about the significance of history (