Help, the debate master wins, the debate master wins!!!!!!

Well, although you are not a master, but multiple people have more strength, but I guess you have finished debating ......

The first one doesn't understand ......

That being said, I think it's hard to argue with the opposite.

The second word:

1.If a country has a disaster, of course, it should deal with it itself, but if it is dependent on a foreign country, what if the country no longer helps?

As with the principle of being a human being, it is definitely not okay to always ask others to help you when you encounter difficulties, it will make people think that you are cowardly, thick-skinned, and annoying, like a parasite.

Or rely on other people's homework and test papers, and it will be even more painful when you can't cheat! When it comes to the time when you really need to solve it yourself, you can't do it, and you can't deal with it!

2.With military force comes power, with atomic bombs there is peace, and the same is true for disasters, and only when countries deal with disasters themselves can they have a world status.

3.Why would foreign countries help our country? Not a purpose?!

And we will definitely remember that others have helped us, and many places will be humble, so that we can exploit our country!

Rhetorical question: Do those who give alms to beggars think that they will be rewarded?

A: Most beggars do not have capital in return, while the state can become rich, and the two are built on different foundations.

Rhetorical question: Is it okay for other countries to exploit us and not give us?

A: This will be criticized by the world, and it will lead to a repeat of the Iraq war.

Personal opinion: the opposing side suffers a little, so you should be able to easily find a lot of arguments and examples for the positive side, then, I will not add icing on the cake, I will only talk about the opposing side:

I think the disadvantage of the opposing side is that it is easy for the other party to say that "relying on chance" is "passive waiting" or "opportunism", and whether it is the judges or the audience, there will be this tendency in their hearts at first.

You say you can use props, then I'll help you design a prop to use).

The opposing party prepares a ** work report or something like that, or a copy of what documents from your school, and what kind of documents? Look down to find out.

Does the opponent's defense friend think that "relying on chance" means completely relying on opportunity? I'm sorry to tell you that this statement is "too creative".

If we want to accomplish so-and-so work, we must rely on the power of the masses (all students) to ......】

Such words are all over the place in various documents and reports, try to find Lao Hu or Lao Wen's words, or what your school has just vigorously promoted not long ago).

**work** does not have to be done, completely dependent on the masses, waiting for the masses to complete it? Or, the school says that it depends on the students, that is, the teachers and principals don't work, and they rely on the students?

That's why I said, the other side's point of view is so "creative"!

When we talk about "relying on opportunities" today, we are not "relying on opportunities", nor are we "waiting for opportunities", but "inseparable from opportunities".

Just as the report just read said: "relying on the masses" and "relying on the students" does not mean that we do not want anything else, but only wait for the masses and students to complete it, but that we "cannot do without" the masses and students.

Therefore, I would like to firmly tell you that we support "success depends on opportunities", not to "wait for opportunities" and "rely on opportunities", but to say that "success is inseparable from opportunities".

If you leave the opportunity, let you be eight buckets high, even if Zhuge Liang has died after doing his best, isn't he capable? Doesn't he work hard? But time is not with me, and in the end, it is still "die before leaving the school, and the hero will be full of tears".

Therefore, if you want to succeed, you can't rely on ability alone, you have to rely on your own efforts, and don't forget, you can't do without opportunities......

If we can successfully interpret "success depends on chance" as "success is inseparable from opportunity", then the opposing defense can be regarded as more than half successful (the key lies in the grasp of the word "rely on").

As for the offensive side, I feel that try to grasp "ability + effort", [effort is equally important] to say this, maybe it is okay, after all, the disadvantage of the opposite side is still relatively obvious, and it is not easy to find a very powerful attack angle.

Using this statement, everyone feels that the [ability] in the other party's mouth is actually just "talent", and [hard work] must be added to succeed.

Positive - by ability.

Contrarian - by chance.

Competence is the foundation and a prerequisite.

And the opportunity is to create a platform for that condition, an environment.

The tree is big and straight.

It's good that good students don't have to worry about it, and they won't do anything out of the ordinary.

It's useless for a bad student to be strict, you can only impress him with your feelings.

I'll give you a core......With this point, it's almost called a comparative debate, so the argument does more harm than good, and you can't just talk about the disadvantages and ignore the word "greater than".

So how can the argument be greater than?

Ok, simply put, it is the essence of the disadvantages and the advantages of the substitution, can be delayed.

That is to say, middle school is the stage of learning, knowledge accumulation and accumulation, which requires focused learning and life. I don't need to list the disadvantages of surfing the Internet, but they all have an obvious characteristic, that is, they hurt the handling of the main contradictions we are facing, studying and living.

And what about the profits? We admit that, indeed, the advantages are obvious, however, some advantages can be replaced by books, teachers, physical activities. Some benefits do not need to be obtained now, and it is okay to obtain them again in time, without affecting normal life.

This is "greater than", I write casually, only write one, I hope to throw bricks and lead to jade, it doesn't matter if you don't divide it.

First, the definition of middle school students and the scope of middle school students are delineated.

Then it is to analyze what is Internet access, such as whether playing games should be classified as Internet access.

Then analyze the pros and cons of surfing the Internet itself.

Of course, it is necessary to grasp the special group of middle school students.

And this is a question of who has the pros and cons, so we can't deny that there are pros and cons.

Well, actually, I'm a second debater, so if there are any specific questions, we can also communicate.

To sort out your thoughts, your opinions are sufficient, for example: the Internet will hurt the body, it is not good for the eyes, and you will unconsciously become addicted to games.

Mainly for online games to mention, it is best not to play addictive games, such as: cf, cs,

Divided into 3 groups, each team will have 2 groups of debates, and the team with the best score will be selected, and then the same mechanism will be played in the three groups drawn.

I ask you a few questions from the perspective of the opposite: What is personality? Mixing and matching clothes is personality?

2Do you have the ability to judge right from wrong? Does the mainstream public have the ability to judge right from wrong? Since they all have the ability to judge, what's the difference?

There are good and bad things, and the mass trend has no personality to speak of?

I won't waste my studies.

If we will abandon our studies, how can we see more and more student entrepreneurs? Moreover, students who can start a business show that they are very good and outstanding in their own right, and how can they waste their studies.

If you manage your time wisely, you won't waste your studies.

Entrepreneurship is also a kind of learning.

The state is also advocating.