In the workplace, how do you get along well between the first and second in command?

First of all, you must express a neutral attitude, do not be too close to one party, let the other party know that you will be regarded as an imaginary enemy. While affirming the number one, we should also recognize the benefits of the second-in-command, and while denying the second-in-command, we should not praise the first-in-command excessively. To be a man, you still have to be round and harmonious.

You have to know that your ability is in **, if you are in the workplace just to regulate the relationship, you find that you seem to be in this company, but there is no need to do so. Or sometimes to a certain extent, you will find that the first and second in command are not interested in you at all, but have problems with your work efficiency and work attitude, so you should change your work attitude instead of focusing on the leader.

The relationship between the first and second leaders in the workplace is still relatively harmonious, and sometimes they are like a very tacit partner, if the relationship is more kind, and everyone has worked for a longer time, there is a tacit understanding, of course, it is a good thing, but some people will be more competitive, regard each other as their opponents, in this case, must not be biased to one side, to be a middle grass.

If you do your job well, you find that you don't actually have to get along well between the first and second leaders, you don't have to offend the other because of this, and in the case of your own work ability, you will find that he seems to be different.

If it is a culturally healthy company, tell the truth, give your professional analysis and opinions, show your professionalism and judgment, and be impartial; If it is a company that obviously needs to stand in line and has serious office politics, you have to weigh it, at this time the wall grass is definitely not good, choose a team, it doesn't matter if it's right or wrong, don't regret it after choosing; Some people say that you can be with the mud, to be honest, the leaders are not stupid, at this time and the mud, both sides are offended, no one will trust you in the future, the choice is always risky, but the greater the risk, the higher the return. In the workplace, it's important to follow the right people.

If you're the de facto executive or an expert in this area, and the company is more democratic and open-minded, then it doesn't hurt to be straight about your point of view. If you don't have a particularly close relationship with the project, are not an authority on some area, or the company doesn't always value the opinions of the following, then the boss is most likely not interested in what you really think. If you're a key stakeholder or an opinion leader, your boss may be looking to you for help.

Your position is very important, so how to choose a side depends on your analysis of the effort and return. If you are just a small character at all, and the above is just igniting you, you have to consider the minimization of the damage and make a wise decision to protect yourself.

Because in the workplace, there must be some competition between the first and second leaders, so at this time, if you want to get along with the two of them, you can't be too tactful, making people think that you won't have something in the middle, but you can't stand in the team at will, because sometimes if you don't pay attention to standing on the wrong team, your career will be affected.

I think you can make a prediction based on the status of the two of them in the workplace next, and then because it is difficult for you to weigh how to get along between the two of them, you can make a simple prediction, more favoring one side or the other, or when you get along with one of them, you feel that the other side is more comfortable and natural, but more often it is better to be an ordinary employee who does not speak.

If you are not familiar with the relationship with the leader, if you want to have a good relationship with the leader and get close to the leader, then you must send blessings during holidays, and also give gifts, and when something happens in the company, you must also stand on the side of the leader and the leader. <>

If anyone wants to be able to mix well in the company, then they must have a good relationship with the company's top leaders, so that they will not be bullied by others. In fact, you can send sincere blessings on various holidays, and then figure out what kind of gifts this leader likes, for example, the number one likes to drink tea, you can send some precious tea. However, it should be noted that when giving gifts to the top leader, you must not forget the leader at the same time, otherwise the leader will feel that he is pleasing the wrong person, and will make a stumbling block for himself, so it is useless to have a good relationship with the leader at this time.

In addition, when saying blessings, you also need a way, don't directly wish the number one a happy holiday in front of all colleagues, otherwise others will feel that they are licking dogs, which will affect the relationship between themselves and the number one, but to bless in private, so that it will be better. <>

When the company stands in line, you must stand on the side of the leader and the leader, otherwise you can't keep yourself no matter how close the relationship with the leader is, after all, the leader is the most powerful one in the whole company. When you find that the number one leader has a problem, you can also rely on your best efforts to help the leader solve this problem, so that the leader will feel that this person is very reliable, so he is also willing to help himself. When helping the leader to do things, you also need to know how to give feedback in a timely manner, so that the leader knows which stage he has achieved, and when he encounters a problem that he will not know, he can also ask the other party directly for advice, and I believe that the other party is willing to teach him.

Finally, I hope you will understand that when you have a particularly close relationship with the leader, you must also maintain a good relationship with the leader, otherwise the leader will feel that this person looks down on you.

You should communicate more with the leader, contact the leader more, understand the leader's preferences, invite the leader to dinner, and show yourself more in front of the leader.

We must complete our work tasks on time, and constantly improve our abilities, know how to empathize with others, have ambitions and ideals, communicate and exchange with leaders more, and seek advice modestly.

It is necessary to understand the preferences of the leader and communicate with the leader more often, so that you can have a good relationship with the leader.

There may be situations in the workplace where the position is the same and the level is the same, but the two must have a priority and a priority, that is, it is impossible for any team to have two bosses. Can you understand the meaning of the first and second in command? The number one is that he has the final say on everything, even if it is the same level, he has the final say, which is divided into priority and subordination.

The second-in-command carries out the work and does his own work, because as far as he knows, even if the first and second leaders of a unit are of the same rank, there is no conflict in the work they are responsible for. At most, the part of the content that is responsible for requires a certain cooperation from the other party, and they are each responsible for different content, and the second-in-command is naturally responsible for his own part of the main work and makes his own decisions, and the first leader is the part of the work he is mainly responsible for to make overall decisions. And then there are more important things in the whole department, and these things that need his signature and nod will be paid attention to.

It's okay to do the part of the work you are responsible for, because since there is such a title, that is, the main person in charge is the number one, otherwise why do people call it this name? It is impossible for a unit to have two main leaders, even if these people are of the same level, the parts they are responsible for are not the same, and the parts in charge of overlap are also divided into priority and subordination. Whoever is the main position and who is the deputy position, otherwise there is no way for this team to go.

In case two people have different opinions, whoever listens must listen to the person who is higher in the ranking. People are the ones who can really make decisions in the end. <>

Everyone's division of labor in the workplace is different, and this difference in level means that the treatment enjoyed by the two is basically similar, and the content of responsibility is also different. But there is always a leader to be elected in a team, so the other party is chosen, and under normal circumstances, the two do not conflict and conflict, so ask a higher level of leadership to make decisions. What's more, a person who can achieve such a position will not have a direct and obvious conflict with someone of his own level, which is a very irrational behavior and impossible.

The second-in-command must first correct his position, have a correct attitude, respect his superiors, have a certain leadership ability to his subordinates, and be able to give full play to his greatest advantages.

The second-in-command should also do his own thing, let his power become greater and higher, his prestige will become higher and higher, manage his subordinates well, and work together with his subordinates.

How should the second-in-command of the department maintain the relationship between the first-in-command and his subordinates? A friend who works in a grassroots unit once said something like this, once, the person in charge of their unit walked out of the conference room, and happened to find that this unit, other units have such "no" things to receive, in view of these small things, according to the convention, should be dealt with, and the "second" is right, who knows that as soon as he returned to the team meeting, he was furious, and he criticized the "second person" from the tone and severity. From now on, this unit is of all sizes, and no leading cadre is willing to express it except for one handle, so "one handle dependence" is slowly formed.

<> the second-in-command of the department think about it carefully, in many units, "one handle dependence" is more serious, one of the most important reasons is that many handles are used to using the power supply alone and do not want to give the power supply. With the passage of time, the unit will inevitably appear "dependent on the first", big and small things must be handled by the first person, some subordinates often procrastinate, perfunctory, such a unit, work efficiency is predictable.

Once a unit has formed an organizational ecological environment in which the leader has the sole power and resources, the unit will lose the soil for effective supervision and restraint of the leader's power rotten zone, which is not only difficult to ensure scientific and rational decision-making, but also easy to lead to abuse of power and even corruption of power. There is a psychological stereotype that we have a close relationship with a person who is respected, capable, learned, intelligent, and has a good character. If someone is single-minded, we tend to avoid them and keep our distance from them.

In their attitude towards different leaders, they also tend to treat powerful people, believing that it is okay to have a big official and good relationship with them, while other deputy leaders do not value them very much. The result? They set themselves in a stumbling block and had to stumble through the difficult work of the Dawn Rock.

The reason why this young man is wise at work is that he knows that many of the "number twos" do not have decision-making power, but they know the personnel relations inside out and have a lot of influence over the "number one". For example, the deputy of the superior, the secretary of the superior, the wife of the superior, they usually also have a decisive role in some things.

You can take the initiative to be friends with each other, you should share anything with each other when you encounter anything in the group celebration, don't hide anything you encounter, tell each other clearly, don't play scheming and collapse.

It is necessary to communicate well, and the family members must also do a good job of communicating with the leader, convey the thoughts of the leader, and sometimes avoid conflicts with the leader, and learn to ease the atmosphere.

The second-in-command of the department plays the role of the first-in-command of the auxiliary department, and should be used as the mouthpiece of the first-in-command to maintain the relationship with his subordinates.

Summary. Hello, the position of the leader is different, the mentality will be different, you serve well, if he is not ready to replace you, you can do it, if there is a specific candidate, you are also ready to move the position.

The words of the number one cannot be refuted, otherwise the group will not have majesty and prestige, so the number one cannot change the order overnight, which is also the way to maintain the absolute truth.

The second-in-command knows a lot of things, but he can't make a decision, and if he does, there are still people above who can change it, which is nothing to say.

The original second-in-command is the number one, because the relationship was not very good before, how to carry out the work as the director of the office?

Hello, when the position of the leader of the sail Gaoxin is different, the mentality will be different, you serve well, if he is not prepared to replace your person, you can do it, if there is a specific candidate, you are also ready to move the position. The words of the number one cannot be refuted, otherwise the group will not have majesty and prestige, so the number one cannot change the order overnight, and this is also the way to maintain the absolute truth. The second-in-command knows a lot of things, but he doesn't think he can make a decision, and if he does, there are still people above him who can change it, which is nothing to say.

I wish you a happy life, please give a thumbs up, thank you!

Employees who encounter such a situation resolutely do the following: First, under normal circumstances, two leaders of a department disagree, and most of them are not inconsistent in direction, but inconsistent in specific ways of doing things. At most, the leader hopes to get more applause from his subordinates.

Second, in general, obey the one who is directly responsible for one's own direct control. Don't try to play against the direct leader, and the one who knows the times is a good man, after all, if you have the same opinion as the direct leader, you must obey the direct leader; If you are not consistent with your direct leader, you must put forward your own opinion plan and obtain the consent of your direct leader, and if your direct leader is not sure to listen to your opinions, then you must keep your own opinion and obey the leader's arrangement. Third, even if there are differences of opinion with one's own direct leaders, it is necessary to adopt appropriate methods to do so.

No longer confronting the leader in the meeting, no longer twisting with the leader in many times, but communicating with the leader in private, and maintaining the authority of the leader in public. Fourth, when two leaders want to win your support, you must not get involved. 1. No matter what the occasion, do not comment on a certain leader.

Second, do not speak ill of another leader in front of the direct leader. Third, once the discussion starts, talk more about the benefits of another leader to this leader. Don't let yourself be the gun of one leader attacking another!

Fifth, keep a clear head, be cautious in words and deeds, and do your own things well in a fair and selfless manner!