Parents want their 22 year old sister to raise their 2 year old brother, what are the details of thi

Because the parents have been living on subsistence allowance, after giving birth to their second child, they found that the economic situation and physical condition of the two people were not able to raise the second son, so they wanted the eldest daughter, who was just 22 years old, to raise her 2-year-old brother. But my sister had just graduated, so she refused to support her younger brother, and then her parents sued the eldest daughter, and in the end, the parents won the lawsuit, and the 22-year-old eldest daughter still had to raise her younger brother.

The details of this matter are that the parents are too old to raise their 2-year-old brother, so they want their eldest daughter to raise their younger brother. I don't think the eldest daughter has the obligation to raise her younger brother.

It's because the parents live on subsistence allowances, and when they are older, they don't have the ability to raise a 2-year-old child, so they ask their sister to raise them.

After the parents gave birth to their second child, they couldn't raise their son due to physical reasons, so they wanted her sister to raise them.

It's just that the family has no money and wants the sister to raise the younger brother. The parents themselves are old, and the family has no money to support their son, so they want the eldest daughter to raise it, and the eldest daughter does not want to raise it, and then the parents sue the court, and finally the court ruled that the sister is obliged to raise the younger brother.

Due to the birth of a second child, the parents' economic conditions are no longer very allowed to raise their younger brother, so they have to be raised by their sister.

The family had been living on subsistence allowance, and then the second child gave birth to a son, but they were unable to raise it, and wanted to let their sister in school raise her, and her sister's tuition is now earned by her own part-time job.

After the death of her parents, her 21-year-old sister can also choose to raise her younger brother if she has a better relationship with her younger brother. But if the relationship between the elder sister and the younger brother is not very good, and the relationship with the parents is not very good, then there is no need to raise the younger brother according to the law, and Laqiao only has the support between the parents and the children. There is no strict rule that after the death of parents, the elder sister must bear the responsibility of raising her younger brother or younger sister, so everyone also depends on their feelings for the younger brother.

When the parents died, the younger brother was only two years old, so it was indeed pitiful, if the sister did not have the ability to raise it. You can choose to send your brother to some orphanage, or find an adoptive parent for your brother, which can also make your brother's life more enjoyable, for a two-year-old child. Even if it is not particularly clear, it is okay to find an adoptive parent and adoptive parent for the child.

In fact, I think people should be selfish, a 21-year-old sister with a two-year-old brother, it is also very difficult to make Jia people in the future, and if the relationship with his brother is particularly bad, then there is no need to affect his future because of his brother.

There are many parents who are very selfish and will seem to want a son when the eldest daughter grows up. And after the son is born, he will also choose to give all his love to his son, so at this time, as sisters, we do not feel any love from our parents, so why should we take on the responsibility of raising my younger brother?

Generally, the eldest daughter is in her 20s, so her parents may be about to reach the age of 50, and having a child at this time is completely irresponsible to her sister and to herself. And after the child is born, when the child needs to get married, he is already in his 70s, what ability can he have to help the child prepare something? So if you want to have a child, it's best to have a child before you are 35 years old.

Of course, it should be raised. After all, the parents are no longer there, and the elder sister and younger brother are dependent on each other, and they are the only relatives in the world. Therefore, Chang Bang's sister is noisy, and she has the duty to take care of her younger brother.

Should. The younger brother lost his father Lu Yu's mother at this time, and his sister only had a relative, so at this time, the elder sister should take on the relevant responsibilities and take care of the younger brother with everyone.

I think you should raise your two-year-old brother, my parents have gone to Mori Lushi, and you are the closest relatives, and you are already an adult, you can go to find a job to make money, and raise your younger brother.

If your parents die, your 21-year-old sister shouldn't support her younger brother, and there are no relevant regulations in the law, which depends on your personal moral character.

There are legal provisions for nurturing, and the elder sister is already an adult, and if she has the ability, she should take on the responsibility of taking care of her younger brother.

You should raise your younger brother, after all, your sister is the closest to your younger brother, there is no provision in the law, and my sister has no obligation to raise my younger brother.

Legally, there is no explicit provision, but logically speaking, it is better to raise your own brother, but as a 23-year-old girl, this is not easy, she needs to support two people at the same time, which is very hard.

I think emotionally I should raise this two-year-old brother, but I don't think my sister has the responsibility to raise this brother, and I think it's very uncomfortable for this situation to happen.

A doll so young is a burden to my sister, and the relationship with my sister is not very deep, and it is easy to affect my sister's future, so it is better not to raise it.

Yes, because the younger brother is still young, his relatives are only the elder sister, and the elder sister has the responsibility and obligation to raise her younger brother.

Of course it should be, although my sister has no obligation in this regard, but she is also the closest person to her younger brother, and she should raise him.

I feel that I have the obligation to raise my younger brother, because my parents have passed away, and only my sister is the only relative, so it is appropriate to raise my younger brother.

According to ** report,A couple who live on subsistence allowance, a few years after giving birth to their second child, because of their physical and economic situation, they are unable to raise the child well, so they want their 22-year-old eldest daughter to raise it, but never thought that their daughter would strongly oppose this, and in the end, the couple sued their biological daughter in court because of this incident.

The lawyer said: According to the marriage law of our country and the provisions of the Civil Code, which will come into force soon, if the parents are not able to support the child, in this case, the siblings have the obligation to support them. So for this two-year-old child, the sister's obligation to support him cannot be refused.

Since the parents want the 22-year-old sister to raise the two-year-old brother, it is likely that the age gap between the two sisters and brothers is relatively large, and the old people's own economy is relatively weak, so they have such an idea. As his own sister, although he has no legal obligation in this regard, he can indeed contribute part of his own strength to raising his younger brother from the perspective of family affection. This is a fine tradition of the Chinese nation, so we should be able to exert as much effort as we can in this regard, and there should not be too much spiritual resistance.

In this case, Mom and Dad must not be able to raise their two-year-old brother before letting their sister raise them.

Such parents are only responsible for their own willfulness!

It should be that the parents lost the ability to support their son and entrusted their 22-year-old sister to raise their younger brother.

Recently, another piece of news has been on the hot search, causing netizens to be very angry, and a recent incident has made netizens talk about it, the thing is like this: there is a two-year-old boy because of custody, and the two-year-old boy sued the little boy's sister in court because there was no one to raise the parents of the two-year-old boy.

The 22-year-old sister refused to raise her 2-year-old brother and was sued by her parents in court, which attracted the attention of many netizens. The child's parents are poor households and do not have enough ability to raise their son, and in a legal sense, when the parents are not able to raise the child, the child's older siblings will have to bear the responsibility of raising them. But from a reasonable point of view, this matter is obviously unreasonable, since the parents are not capable of raising a child, they are determined to give birth to this son, and in the end they can't raise it, so they have to hand it over to their daughter to raise, how unfair it is to the daughter.

1. The court ruled that the elder sister could not refuse to support the younger brother. In China, there are relevant laws that when the parents die or are unable to raise their children, the child's older siblings have the obligation to raise the child. The premise of this law is that the older sibling must be able to afford it and that the dependent child is not more than 18 years old.

The 22-year-old girl is already working, her parents are poor households, and from a legal point of view, the older sister should support the younger brother.

Second, the legality of the matter may not be reasonable. There are many irrationalities in this matter, the tuition and living expenses paid by this sister for college are all completed by grants, and her parents do not provide her with any financial help. It is understood that the family itself is a poor family, and since they can't afford to raise a son, why should they have a son to increase the burden on the family, or even increase the burden on their daughter.

3. There is a big problem with parents. In this case, there is a great deal of responsibility on the part of the parents. Perhaps influenced by traditional thinking, parents are determined to have a son, but after the birth of their son, they are unable to raise them, which brings excessive pressure to the young daughter's life.

If you don't have the ability to raise a child, you shouldn't bring the child into this world, the child is innocent, and the child's sister is also innocent. Born in such a family, there is no sense of happiness, and the responsibility for raising the younger brother will even affect the girl's future marriage.

The law is supportive, because the parents are old and have no experience to raise a second child, and the sister must be held responsible.

Legal support, after all, the parents do not have the ability to raise a 2-year-old child, so the sister has to bear this responsibility.

Not supported. Because the law generally stipulates that parents are the guardians of minors, the law does not support parents letting their 22-year-old sister raise their 2-year-old brother.

In the tank. Because according to the provisions of the Civil Code, the adult sister is obligated to support her 2-year-old brother, so the law supports it.

If the parents do not have the financial strength and the sister has the ability, the law will support it. If the parents simply want to shirk the responsibility of raising the younger brother, then the law will not support it.

It is supported by law, and since the parents are not capable of raising it, the elder sister is an adult and has the obligation to support her.

Legally supported, but it is difficult for me, 22 years old just entered the society, the income is low, raising a little doll is so hard, the mentality may collapse, parents should be the main force, and my sister tries her best to support it is the truth.

The parents sued their daughter in court, and finally the court ruled in favor of the parents, and the sister will fulfill the obligation to support her younger brother, which shows that the law still supports it. But I think this is unfair to my sister, when I gave birth to a second child, as a parent, I should consider whether the family's conditions can afford it.

Yes, the premise is that the parents have lost the ability to support their children. Parents often want to keep a companion for their only child, and it's good to have this idea, but you must communicate well with your sister. Find out what my sister thinks.

According to the marriage law of our country and the provisions of the Civil Code, which will come into force soon, if the parents are unable to support the child, in this case, the siblings have the obligation to support them.

From a legal point of view, it is legal for parents to live on subsistence allowances, and for older sisters to be adults and have the ability to raise a 2-year-old brother.

From a practical point of view, this has a great limit on my sister's future development.

The law supports that if the parents are not able to raise the child, the sister's obligation cannot be refused.

With parents, a 22-year-old sister should not raise a 2-year-old brother, and the sister has the obligation to take care of her younger brother, but she has no obligation to raise her younger brother. This is also funny for the parents, the old son still wants his daughter to help raise her, this is not to deprive her of her freedom, and seriously interfere with her daughter's life.

This pair of parents is not old, they first consider the burden of being old, this is really the most good at finding the existence of a drag oil bottle for their daughter, although the sister and brother are concentric is the family world, but the age difference is huge, and it is too early to ask for child support from the daughter.

It's really a strange parent, unless both of them are sick and can't earn the conditions for raising children, then this daughter has to shoulder the responsibility.

Second, with parents and younger brothers, a 22-year-old daughter should interact with the beauty of her family and give herself the world she can give to raise her younger brother. At the age of 22, when you are still in school, you should not have time to take care of your younger brother, nor do you have the financial conditions to take care of it, and being able to support yourself is a good way to give back to your parents.

As a parent, you should not block your daughter at the age when she needs to work hard, there is really no way to conclude that her daughter should choose the way she chooses, and her parents can't force it.

Unless the parents are unreasonable, how can any parent hinder the child from completing his own self-reliance first, and the parents should be fully capable of raising a second child.

3. There are only two ways for a 22-year-old daughter to raise her younger brother, one is to give economic conditions, and the other is to give companion time, and these two attitudes at the age of 22 are also the right stage. If you are still in school, you can help with the children during the holidays. If you work, you can save money and pay a little filial piety.

This pair of parents can not blindly instill the responsibility between relatives, nor can they force their daughters to obey the cognition, at the age of 22, there is a correct understanding of the world, will give the most worry-free reality in the current situation of the family.

The 22-year-old daughter will definitely raise her 2-year-old brother, and the road will be so long in the future, the reality of the younger brother will get better and better, even if she does not raise her younger brother, the reality in the future will also help her younger brother.

At the age of 22, he is not able to raise his younger brother, and the parents should have known that their siblings will not be alienated from each other.