What do you think about the parents letting their 22 year old sister raise their 2 year old brother?

If the parents do not have the financial strength to raise their son, when their daughter is an adult, and she has worked and has an income, she actually needs to help her parents raise her younger brother, but during the period of raising her younger brother, as a daughter, she should only help her parents relieve the financial pressure, not all of them need her daughter to come out. After giving birth to their second child, the husband and wife who relied on the subsistence allowance reported wanted to let their eldest daughter raise them because their physical and economic conditions were not very good, and they were also unable to let their sons be well controlled.

Although the 22-year-old daughter objected at the time, the relationship between the parents and the daughter had broken down after the parents took their daughter to court. And according to the laws of the country, if the parents are not able to support the child, then they are obliged to raise the child as a sibling. At that time, the child was only two years old, which was an unshirkable support obligation for my sister.

It's just that when this incident was revealed, many netizens on the Internet expressed sympathy for this daughter. After all, the girl's parents relied on subsistence allowances to live, and the family was not wealthy in the first place. When it comes to having a child, it takes a lot of energy and time for the child.

And in order to give children a good education, a certain amount of economic strength is also needed in education.

The parents did not take this into account, and instead had children in families that were not wealthy, which would make the family poorer and poorer. And the daughter of the parents is only 22 years old, should have just graduated from college, for the newly graduated college students, the salary is not high, working hard in the city, even their own life is not good, how can they still have the energy to raise a two-year-old child?

Therefore, the parents did not consider whether their financial situation allowed it when they gave birth to a child, and the parents were also old, and they would also need the girl to raise them at that time, so for the girl, the financial pressure is very great, and sometimes it will even collapse.

Recently, an official article on the People's Procuratorate of Wujin District, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province caused heated discussions, and a couple who survived on subsistence allowance sued their biological daughter in court because the daughter was unwilling to raise her 2-year-old brother.

If the parents do not have the ability to raise them, then the sister can support their younger brother, but the problem is that the parents are completely capable of raising them, but they are not willing to take responsibility, which is really annoying.

I think this is actually an unreasonable thing, because the older sister does not have the right to refuse the birth of her younger brother, but has to fulfill the obligation to raise her younger brother, so the rights and obligations are not equal.

Personally, I think that my sister should not be forced to raise my younger brother through legal channels, and my sister should raise her voluntarily, which is due to family affection, and if she is unwilling, it is understandable.

I think this kind of parents are very irresponsible, although the child's sister has the responsibility to treat him well, but there is no obligation to support the younger brother at all, they will only drag the sister down by doing so.

I think it's a matter of affection to raise him, don't kidnap people morally, and she's only twenty-two years old and has only been out of society for a short time. Besides, her parents had the obligation to support her brother, she didn't, she only had the obligation to support her parents.

I think what parents do is not very moral, the child is to be born by themselves, and after giving birth, they say that they can't raise it, the son is their own child, and the daughter is not? Besides, the daughter is 22 years old and already has a life on her own, and there will be a new family and children, and she has to raise such a young brother, what does her boyfriend think in the future, this is a drag on the daughter.

Personally, I don't understand such a thing. Although it is a small expectation of every pair of parents to have both children, it should be based on the fact that parents have enough money to be responsible for their children's expenses before they become adults, and even if they have a certain financial strength, it is important to be able to raise their children in person, after all, the company of parents is indispensable in the process of growing up. It is very irresponsible for a parent to give birth to a young child and expect the older child to take responsibility if they are unable to meet even these basic conditions.

I think this thing is a bit too direct, it shouldn't be like this, it should be harmonious.

After the death of her parents, her 21-year-old sister can also choose to raise her younger brother if she has a better relationship with her younger brother. But if the relationship between the elder sister and the younger brother is not very good, and the relationship with the parents is not very good, then there is no need to raise the younger brother according to the law, and Laqiao only has the support between the parents and the children. There is no strict rule that after the death of parents, the elder sister must bear the responsibility of raising her younger brother or younger sister, so everyone also depends on their feelings for the younger brother.

When the parents died, the younger brother was only two years old, so it was indeed pitiful, if the sister did not have the ability to raise it. You can choose to send your brother to some orphanage, or find an adoptive parent for your brother, which can also make your brother's life more enjoyable, for a two-year-old child. Even if it is not particularly clear, it is okay to find an adoptive parent and adoptive parent for the child.

In fact, I think people should be selfish, a 21-year-old sister with a two-year-old brother, it is also very difficult to make Jia people in the future, and if the relationship with his brother is particularly bad, then there is no need to affect his future because of his brother.

There are many parents who are very selfish and will seem to want a son when the eldest daughter grows up. And after the son is born, he will also choose to give all his love to his son, so at this time, as sisters, we do not feel any love from our parents, so why should we take on the responsibility of raising my younger brother?

Generally, the eldest daughter is in her 20s, so her parents may be about to reach the age of 50, and having a child at this time is completely irresponsible to her sister and to herself. And after the child is born, when the child needs to get married, he is already in his 70s, what ability can he have to help the child prepare something? So if you want to have a child, it's best to have a child before you are 35 years old.

Of course, it should be raised. After all, the parents are no longer there, and the elder sister and younger brother are dependent on each other, and they are the only relatives in the world. Therefore, Chang Bang's sister is noisy, and she has the duty to take care of her younger brother.

Should. The younger brother lost his father Lu Yu's mother at this time, and his sister only had a relative, so at this time, the elder sister should take on the relevant responsibilities and take care of the younger brother with everyone.

I think you should raise your two-year-old brother, my parents have gone to Mori Lushi, and you are the closest relatives, and you are already an adult, you can go to find a job to make money, and raise your younger brother.

If your parents die, your 21-year-old sister shouldn't support her younger brother, and there are no relevant regulations in the law, which depends on your personal moral character.

There are legal provisions for nurturing, and the elder sister is already an adult, and if she has the ability, she should take on the responsibility of taking care of her younger brother.

You should raise your younger brother, after all, your sister is the closest to your younger brother, there is no provision in the law, and my sister has no obligation to raise my younger brother.

Legally, there is no explicit provision, but logically speaking, it is better to raise your own brother, but as a 23-year-old girl, this is not easy, she needs to support two people at the same time, which is very hard.

I think emotionally I should raise this two-year-old brother, but I don't think my sister has the responsibility to raise this brother, and I think it's very uncomfortable for this situation to happen.

A doll so young is a burden to my sister, and the relationship with my sister is not very deep, and it is easy to affect my sister's future, so it is better not to raise it.

Yes, because the younger brother is still young, his relatives are only the elder sister, and the elder sister has the responsibility and obligation to raise her younger brother.

Of course it should be, although my sister has no obligation in this regard, but she is also the closest person to her younger brother, and she should raise him.

I feel that I have the obligation to raise my younger brother, because my parents have passed away, and only my sister is the only relative, so it is appropriate to raise my younger brother.

According to ** report,A couple who live on subsistence allowance, a few years after giving birth to their second child, because of their physical and economic situation, they are unable to raise the child well, so they want their 22-year-old eldest daughter to raise it, but never thought that their daughter would strongly oppose this, and in the end, the couple sued their biological daughter in court because of this incident.

The lawyer said: According to the marriage law of our country and the provisions of the Civil Code, which will come into force soon, if the parents are not able to support the child, in this case, the siblings have the obligation to support them. So for this two-year-old child, the sister's obligation to support him cannot be refused.

Since the parents want the 22-year-old sister to raise the two-year-old brother, it is likely that the age gap between the two sisters and brothers is relatively large, and the old people's own economy is relatively weak, so they have such an idea. As his own sister, although he has no legal obligation in this regard, he can indeed contribute part of his own strength to raising his younger brother from the perspective of family affection. This is a fine tradition of the Chinese nation, so we should be able to exert as much effort as we can in this regard, and there should not be too much spiritual resistance.

In this case, Mom and Dad must not be able to raise their two-year-old brother before letting their sister raise them.

Such parents are only responsible for their own willfulness!

It should be that the parents lost the ability to support their son and entrusted their 22-year-old sister to raise their younger brother.

With parents, a 22-year-old sister should not raise a 2-year-old brother, and the sister has the obligation to take care of her younger brother, but she has no obligation to raise her younger brother. This is also funny for the parents, the old son still wants his daughter to help raise her, this is not to deprive her of her freedom, and seriously interfere with her daughter's life.

This pair of parents is not old, they first consider the burden of being old, this is really the most good at finding the existence of a drag oil bottle for their daughter, although the sister and brother are concentric is the family world, but the age difference is huge, and it is too early to ask for child support from the daughter.

It's really a strange parent, unless both of them are sick and can't earn the conditions for raising children, then this daughter has to shoulder the responsibility.

Second, with parents and younger brothers, a 22-year-old daughter should interact with the beauty of her family and give herself the world she can give to raise her younger brother. At the age of 22, when you are still in school, you should not have time to take care of your younger brother, nor do you have the financial conditions to take care of it, and being able to support yourself is a good way to give back to your parents.

As a parent, you should not block your daughter at the age when she needs to work hard, there is really no way to conclude that her daughter should choose the way she chooses, and her parents can't force it.

Unless the parents are unreasonable, how can any parent hinder the child from completing his own self-reliance first, and the parents should be fully capable of raising a second child.

3. There are only two ways for a 22-year-old daughter to raise her younger brother, one is to give economic conditions, and the other is to give companion time, and these two attitudes at the age of 22 are also the right stage. If you are still in school, you can help with the children during the holidays. If you work, you can save money and pay a little filial piety.

This pair of parents can not blindly instill the responsibility between relatives, nor can they force their daughters to obey the cognition, at the age of 22, there is a correct understanding of the world, will give the most worry-free reality in the current situation of the family.

The 22-year-old daughter will definitely raise her 2-year-old brother, and the road will be so long in the future, the reality of the younger brother will get better and better, even if she does not raise her younger brother, the reality in the future will also help her younger brother.

At the age of 22, he is not able to raise his younger brother, and the parents should have known that their siblings will not be alienated from each other.

Raised by my sister is legally supported, but the reality is that I can't afford to raise it alone, and when my parents are in trouble, my sister should help appropriately, after all, it's my own brother.

It stands to reason that my sister shouldn't be raised, but my parents really can't raise my children, and for the sake of family affection, I should help my parents raise my younger brother.

It should be raised, but it is difficult, but I will do my best to raise, since you call me a sister, then I will love you well and take care of you, I thank my parents for bringing you to the world, let me have one more person dearest, I don't raise, who will raise, only the younger brother grows up healthily, can be worthy of the parent's nurturing grace to himself.

On a legal level, she should be raised, as she is the only one who can afford to support her younger brother.

The elder sister should raise the younger brother. According to the laws of the country, siblings have an obligation to support a child if the parents are unable to support the child. Therefore, for the younger brother who is only two years old, the elder sister cannot refuse the obligation to support her.