From a military point of view, what was the reason for the defeat of France in the Franco Prussian W

Updated on history 2024-03-05
14 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    1. The war mobilization system is aging, and the Prussian army has already established a nationwide emergency mobilization system, and states such as Schleswig are linked with it, while France is still in the process of issuing army mobilization orders step by step, and then to the division level and then to the local method, which is extremely slow.

    2. The king is easy to conquer: The general monarch is not easy to conquer in person, but the expedition will win. And it is unwise that they are not fully prepared for war.

    3. Backward army system: Before the war, a large number of troops of the French army were not satisfied, and the establishment of military divisions was seriously lacking, which was very different from the Prussian army, which had been full for a long time.

    4. Backward tactical system: For example, the French army marched to the front line after the units were assembled in a certain area, and the Prussian army was dispersed to the forward assembly area at the lowest regimental level, and the time gap between the two was clear at a glance.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The war plan was not thorough, and the army establishment was unreasonable (except for the Guards, there was no division and army level in peacetime, and it was formed only when the battle was immediate); slow mobilization and assembly; Logistics is backward, operational command is chaotic, and equipment is backward.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The emperor himself went into battle. Poor preparation. A rabble of hundreds of thousands of troops. An army that doesn't even have provisions, a combat map.

    The Prussian army is Bismarck.

    The last obstacle to German reunification.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    First of all, the strategy was not prepared, and a large number of generals were not in place beforehand. After the start of the war, the troops did not complete the assembly in the first place.

    Second, in terms of organization, the establishment of the armed forces is irrational and lacks a fixed structure.

    Third, in terms of strategic command, the other side has not clearly judged its intentions, resulting in passivity.

    In terms of equipment, the artillery is inferior to the Austrian army, and a large number of new equipment emphasizes secrecy too much in advance, and the troops do not know how to use it.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Because Britain just wanted to reap the benefits of the fisherman, it maintained a neutral attitude towards the Franco-Prussian War, and whoever won would go to get a piece of the pie.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The reason is simple, it comes from the well-known words of Palmerston, the Prime Minister of the British Empire: there are no eternal friends and foes, and there are only eternal interests in ruin. Because of the interests, the two countries could form an Anglo-French alliance; It was also because of interests that Britain did not stand by and watch from the sidelines when France was in trouble. Prepare for land.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Because he was afraid that France would have a way back, and then there would be a defeat, and he could not tolerate defeat, so he did not annex France.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Because he feels that there are many states and counties in France, I am afraid that he will not be able to swallow them all for a while, and when the time comes, he will give France time to rest and recuperate, which will lead to his final defeat.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Because France at that time was divided into two phases of battle, the second phase did not end the battle, and if it was pursued, it would definitely lead to the defeat of the war.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Because Germany and Britain both wanted to annex France at that time, they were sanctioned by some other countries, so they did not take advantage of the victory.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The Franco-Prussian War was the last of the famous "Three Dynastic Wars", which ended in a Prussian victory and maximized the outcome at a very low cost. This war directly led to the birth of the Second German Empire, which also marked the unification of the German nation. Since then, the German state has remained largely unified and sees itself as the core of Europe.

    Therefore, the importance of the Franco-Prussian War for Germany is self-evident. The war situation was extremely unfavorable for France, and indirectly led to the defeat of France.

    The trigger for the Franco-Prussian War was the succession to the Spanish throne. In 1868, civil strife broke out in Spain, and the admiral led the sailors to launch a rebellion, which was supported by the Spanish people and became known as the Fifth Spanish Revolution. When the army sent by the Spanish crown was defeated by the rebels, the Queen of Spain was forced into exile in France.

    The rebels temporarily formed Spain**. However, since the people did not support the republican system, a provisional ** constitutional monarchy was established, with Marshal Prim as regent, but there was still a lack of monarchs, so the provisional ** had to recruit a king from the royal families of European countries. Prussian Chancellor Bismarck took the opportunity to recommend Prince Leopold of the Hohenzollern family to Marshal Prim.

    The prince was a cousin of the King of Prussia and a member of the House of Hohenzollern. Bismarck's plan was that sooner or later there would be a war between Prussia and France. If the Hohenzollerns became kings of Spain, France was bound to be attacked by both sides, a format that was very advantageous to Prussia at the time.

    Later, Bismarck was having dinner at home with Army Minister Ron and Chief of the General Staff Moltke. Having received the telegram, he read it, handed it to them, and asked Prussia if it was now possible to defeat France. After the two men explicitly told Bismarck that Prussia was capable of defeating France, Bismarck began his operation.

    He directly falsified the contents of the telegram, so that the original description of the events turned into Prussia, threatened by France, not to inherit the Spanish throne, and France sent an ambassador to cause trouble for William I. Furiously refusing to give any guarantees, William I drove out the French ambassador.

    This revised telegram was the "Ames Secret Telegram", which would be called the fuse of the Franco-Prussian War.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Mainly because France and Britain are two countries that do not deal with each other. They both wanted to encroach on each other's territory, so it broke out. In the end, it was the British who won.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    This was a war between France and the Kingdom of Prussia, which at that time wanted to unify Germany, and there was a struggle with the French Empire.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    The Franco-Prussian War was a war between Prussia and France, and it was also the main battlefield of Napoleon's foreign conquests. It ended in the defeat of France.

Related questions
21 answers2024-03-05

In 1928, after returning from the United States, Yamamoto went to London twice a year to attend naval disarmament conferences, serving as captain of the cruiser "Isuzu" and the aircraft carrier "Akagi," chief of the technical division of the Naval Aviation Department, and commander of the First Air Force. In 1934, he was promoted to lieutenant general and became Minister of Aviation. During this period, Yamamoto was most interested in aircraft, and he trumpeted "air force doctrine" and "offensive warfare based on aircraft carriers". >>>More

5 answers2024-03-05

"From the Army" expresses the author's unswerving thoughts and feelings for defending the motherland like the soldiers, and the central idea: this poem shows that the soldiers guarding the border are not afraid of hardships, as well as their heroic ambition to kill the enemy and serve the country. Brief analysis of the poem: >>>More

5 answers2024-03-05

1. The peasant class - to build an ideal society of absolute equality. >>>More

9 answers2024-03-05

I have my own understanding of the psychology of "reading lead at the age of three to see the big, and looking old at the age of seven". From a personality point of view, this quote emphasizes the importance of childhood for the growth and development of a person, while also revealing the impact of the early stages of personality formation on the future. >>>More

3 answers2024-03-05

Just introduce topics that interest people!