Is it possible to lay off workers from the reform of public institutions?

The issue of termination of the employment contract is clearly stipulated, and it is okay if there is no violation of the provisions.

Regulations on the Personnel Management of Public Institutions

Chapter IV Employment Contracts.

Article 12 The term of employment contracts concluded between public institutions and staff members shall generally not be less than 3 years.

Article 13 Where a staff member who is employed for the first time has an employment contract with a public institution for a period of more than 3 years, the probationary period shall be 12 months.

Article 14 Where a staff member of a public institution has worked in the unit for 10 consecutive years and is less than 10 years away from the statutory retirement age, and proposes to conclude a contract of employment until retirement, the public institution shall conclude a contract with him for employment until retirement.

Article 15: Where a staff member of a public institution is absent from work for more than 15 consecutive working days, or for a total of more than 30 working days in one year, the public institution may terminate the employment contract.

Article 16: Where staff members of public institutions fail to pass the annual evaluation and do not agree to adjust their positions, or fail to pass the annual evaluation for two consecutive years, the public institution may terminate the employment contract by giving 30 days' written notice.

Article 17: The employment contract may be terminated if the staff of a public institution notifies the public institution in writing 30 days in advance. However, unless otherwise agreed by both parties on the termination of the employment contract.

Article 18: Where staff members of public institutions receive the sanction of dismissal, the employment contract is to be terminated.

Article 19 From the date on which the employment contract is dissolved or terminated in accordance with law, the personnel relationship between the public institution and the personnel whose employment contract has been dissolved or terminated shall be terminated.

It won't be laid off, it will only make you work in different jobs, and when you enter the system, you will generally keep working and leaving.

No one can say for sure what will happen in the future, this country has a policy a day, it used to be the state to provide for the elderly, and now it is to postpone retirement, and it is a step to go one step at a time, maybe there will be no preparation in the future, there is no pension, and the state requires you to fend for yourself.

No.

Public institutions refer to social service organizations established by the use of state-owned assets and engaged in education, science and technology, culture, health and other activities. Public institutions accept the leadership of the first and are legal entities in the form of organizations or institutions. The establishment of public institutions is a kind of establishment and guarantee for personnel working in public institutions.

Advantages of employment in public institutions

The reform of public institutions has removed administrative, production and operation functions, and highlighted public welfare functions. The employment system management is also being piloted in various localities, and it will be comprehensively promoted. However, even if the employment system is implemented, but the post management method has changed, the business establishment is still used, and the status of the business personnel is supported by the government.

The work of public institutions is relatively stable. Unless you make a serious mistake in a public institution, you will generally not be laid off and unemployed, nor will you be fired or dismissed. Public institutions can have a good future whether they are developing in management positions or in professional and technical fields.

Take the path of job promotion in management positions.

If it is a civil servant, it can also be adjusted to work in the administrative department; If you have mastered a certain amount of professional skills, you can be promoted through professional titles, and it is easier to obtain higher salary income.

1.Violating various laws and regulations, of course, may be "laid off".

2.As a result of the major structural readjustment of public institutions, some units will inevitably embark on the road of becoming enterprises. The employment method based on labor contracts will inevitably lead to the possibility of layoffs.

And there is a certain risk of large-scale layoffs, although from the perspective of stability maintenance, the risk will not be as great as that of the original state-owned enterprises and collective enterprises.

3.Public institutions also have an establishment, and the "business establishment" is much safer than the current contract workers, but once they are converted to contract workers, there will be risks.

In fact, the real unemployment is that you are unemployed. And the real situation of unemployment is that you can't survive in this industry category.

To put it simply, the main reason for the layoffs of employees in state-owned enterprises is that the reform of the state-owned enterprise mechanism has changed from wholly state-owned to state-owned, state-owned, and private-owned, and the pattern of interests has completely changed. Civil servants will not be able to be laid off like employees of state-owned enterprises, and it will be difficult unless the unit of the civil servant becomes a public institution or enterprise. As for public institutions, unless they become enterprises, it is also very difficult, and in general, the possibility is extremely small.

There will be no total cancellation.

The "Decision" of the Third Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee clearly stated that it is necessary to speed up the reform of the classification of public institutions and promote the transformation of qualified public institutions into enterprises or social organizations.

From the perspective of local leadership, Beijing Municipality issued the "Opinions on Accelerating the Management of Innovative Institutions and Promoting the Reform of Public Institutions by Classification", exploring the exclusion of existing universities and hospitals from the establishment management, and gradually recovering the establishment with natural attrition, so as to retain the nature of public institutions.

Employees of public hospitals and university teachers, staff members who undertake administrative functions and are engaged in production and business activities, and employees of public institutions; **The compilation office will increase the overall allocation of faculty and staff and the adjustment of cross-city and county; Appropriately recover some of the vacancies scattered in various public institutions, make overall plans for adjustments, and give priority to meeting the needs of the development of primary and secondary education. So for those of you who are planning to prepare for the teacher exam now, the establishment of primary and secondary school teachers is still waiting for you

Public institutions will not completely abolish their establishments in the face of reform. Basically, there have been cancellations. New text. You can check it out in the news.

It is impossible for public institutions to completely abolish their establishment.

The reform of public institutions is generally divided into three categories:

Clause. 1. Those that undertake administrative functions shall be transferred to administrative bodies or transferred to administrative bodies. This is actually a good thing, that is to say, some of the staff of public institutions who are undertaking administrative functions may be turned into civil servants, that is, the administrative establishment.

Clause. 2. For those engaged in production and business activities, they will be gradually transformed into enterprises. This is what most candidates are most worried about, but everyone can rest assured, in fact, this has little impact on candidates, and for the staff of production and operation institutions, targeted policies may be introduced.

III. Those engaged in public interest services who continue to remain in the sequence of public institutions, strengthen the public interest attributes, and where the market cannot allocate resources, are to be divided into the first category of public welfare, and those who undertake public interest services such as higher education and non-profit medical care, and where resources may be partially allocated by the market, are to be divided into the second category of public welfare. In fact, these public institutions are strengthening their establishment.

It cannot be completely ruled out that some public institutions will be downsized and laid off, but this does not mean that all public institutions will suffer layoffs. In fact, at present, China's economic development still maintains a stable situation of division and stability, and the state is also continuously increasing investment in public institutions to promote the improvement and improvement of public service capabilities.

In addition, China's implementation of the policy of "state-owned enterprises are healthy" will also affect the operation and management of some public institutions. In addition, some unqualified public institutions may also be eliminated in the course of reform. Therefore, for individual business institutions, if they can continuously improve and enhance the quality and level of service, they will not face too much pressure to lay off employees.

On the other hand, in recent years, certain achievements and progress have been made in the reform of public institutions in China, and the main bases include the following aspects:

1.Streamlining of institutions: Optimize and streamline some unnecessary institutions and positions to make the organization more streamlined.

2.Reform of the employment system: For some positions that are permanently serviced by employees, the wage system will be gradually changed.

3.Reform of employee remuneration system: In order to increase employee salary income, some units gradually increase employees' wages through internal employment and performance appraisal.

4.Construction of management information system: In order to improve the work efficiency of public institutions, management information construction has also become a direction of reform.

To sum up, the tide of downsizing and layoffs of public institutions is not inevitable, and it mainly depends on the state's support policy for public institutions and the reform and improvement of public institutions themselves. Public institutions should actively promote their own reform and innovation in order to optimize and expand their own service quality, improve their contribution to society, better meet the needs of industry development, and effectively enhance their core competitiveness in the industry.

With economic development and social changes, the scale and structure of government organs and institutions may change, which may include a certain degree of downsizing and layoffs. This is mainly because:

1.Reform and adjustment: Departments may reform and adjust institutions to improve efficiency and reduce waste. This may result in the downsizing or consolidation of some single spine positions, or the elimination of some positions.

2.Technological progress and automation: With the continuous advancement of technology and the popularization of automation, some traditional institutions and institutions may no longer need a large number of human resources, which may lead to the layoff of some positions.

It should be noted, however, that downsizing and layoffs are not something that will necessarily happen. **Measures may be taken to reduce the occurrence of this situation, such as providing training and transfer opportunities, or providing safeguards to help affected individuals re-enter the workforce. In addition, some government agencies and institutions may adapt to the new market and social needs through innovation and reform, so as to maintain their competitiveness and viability.

The question of whether government agencies and institutions will usher in a wave of downsizing and layoffs in the next few years involves a series of complex policy and economic factors, and it is difficult to make accurate statements under the condition of high uncertainty. Here are some possible scenarios:

1.Ageing population: As the population ages, it is likely that there will be a need to increase spending on areas such as pensions, health care, and social services, so it is likely that there will be more investment and support for public services and institutions rather than a reduction in the number of employees.

2.Digital transformation: As digital transformation accelerates, work will become more efficient and intelligent. In the future, government agencies and institutions may need more digital professionals, which will promote employment opportunities.

3.Fiscal revenue and expenditure: **Fiscal revenue and expenditure is also a factor in determining whether or not to downsize government agencies and institutions. If the overall economy is in a downturn and fiscal revenues are reduced, it may be considered to reduce spending, including downsizing government agencies and institutions.

In short, whether government agencies and institutions will usher in a wave of downsizing and layoffs in the next few years is a complex and uncertain issue, which requires comprehensive consideration of policy, social and economic factors. In any case, it is advisable for everyone to keep learning, upskilling, and adapting to new technologies in order to meet the employment challenges that may arise in the future.

Affected by the current epidemic for many years, the economy is in a downturn, and all industries have industrial impacts. You like this organ and institution also belong to this Pi Shi Jian aspect, now the population base is so large, the majority of people participate in the management of the system. Oversupply, coupled with the impact of talents, some people who do not have the spirit of innovation and only care about iron jobs will be impacted.

There will be some people who will be laid off, but the proportion will not be very large, accounting for about 5%.

The population is declining and economic growth is slowing. In the future, they will inevitably be downsized and laid off.