Why doesn t F1 cars use ABS EBD

Upstairs, it's nonsense, electronic brake-force distribution, anti-lock braking, and electronic steering systems or something, and F1 used to be there, and the FIA revised the F1 rules in 06 to cancel it, and you don't want to think about it. The world's most funded event, how can you not even fit this thing? Now it's all standard on civilian cars, and it's all standard and says!! 1.Rule Restrictions.

Due to the huge difference in the importance and investment of each team in technology research and development, there is a huge gap in the electronic systems of racing cars (systems that automatically control the car, such as start control, gear control, traction control, etc.), and the race is prone to one-sided situations. At the same time, advances in electronic systems have regressed the driver's driving skills. In order to prevent Formula 1 from being overly competitive and ignoring driver driving skills, the FIA has decided to make changes to the Formula 1 rules, especially in terms of electronic systems.

As a part of the electronic system, the ABS system naturally cannot escape the fate of being eliminated. 2.Technical reasons.

Once the brakes of civilian vehicles are pressed, all wheels will be locked up and control will be lost. And when an F1 car locks on its tires to brake, it tends to be on only one wheel. This means that as long as one wheel is locked, the speed can be reduced, and the steering can still be achieved at this time.

In addition, professional riders also have the ability to step on, release, pedal, and release through the brakes. The action is in the corner to achieve the effect of ABS. So ABS does look a bit redundant in this convenience.

3.Security considerations. The reason why civilian vehicles are equipped with ABS is to prevent accidents caused by the inability to control the direction of the vehicle after the tires are locked, but on the contrary, the F1 car will become unsafe.

Due to the high speed of the car, it is unsafe to use ABS when you miss the braking point or get too close to the car in front, which will seriously affect the braking force, causing you to rush off the track or hit the car in front.

hoho……I have seen it for a long time.

The ground floor is right.

The little bit of work on the sole of the left foot in a professional race car is still quite solid. I'd suggest you go back and try a simulation racing game like RF, find a mod with a high simulation like CTDP05, and then F9 turn off ABS and try it out with heavy ......foot brakes in the corner

In fact, the aerodynamic downforce of F1 needs to be shown at higher speeds, and the cornering braking speed is not too high, and the total weight of F1 is just over 600kg, and the mechanical downforce is even worse than GT and Touring. Especially if you need to step on the brakes to corner, decelerating too quickly can throw the rear of the car out of the corner, especially if the braking point is delayed at low and medium speeds.

Therefore, the driver will never step on the brakes to the end, of course, it is not to simulate the ABS like the brakes, but to step on the accelerator slowly, absolutely not to the end, otherwise it will be spin.

Another factor is that the Brake Bias of F1 is already much further behind than that of civilian cars. The brake bias of civilian cars is about 80-20 to 70-30, while the brake bias of F1 is about 60-40 because the brake nose sinking is far less serious than that of civilian cars, and the braking stability after the center of gravity is also better.

In addition, there is a general trend that racing cars will use far fewer assistance systems than civilian vehicles, which is a general rule.

If the car is armed with a lot of auxiliary systems, then the competition is not interesting, the reason why the car is wonderful is because it is a contest between the driver and the car as a whole, too much assistance weakens the importance of the driver's technology, and will make the cost of car development skyrocket, the driver's technology is no longer a driver's proud capital. There was a period of time in the history of F1 where various high-tech technologies were used, and later the FIA banned them one by one, just to give the car a place for the driver. With a high-quality driver, these aids become useless and increase the weight of the car in vain, so all the cars have only a very small number of auxiliary systems working, and the rest are not allowed.

Not only F1 does not, but all the cars in the world do not have electronic auxiliary equipment such as ABS, because in the race, ABS will cause the braking distance to be too long, or even unable to brake. For professionally trained racers, the movement of the feet can completely exceed the role of ABS.

Brakes are the first lesson of racing, and it is also the most basic technology, only by practicing the brakes well, it is possible to reach higher speeds.

Because often overtaking in corners, the driver will choose a later braking point, if there is an ABS anti-lock braking system, the driver will brake with all his might regardless of everything, but if there is an ABS, the driver has to consider what level of braking to step on when overtaking, which will increase the driver's driving skills, not for overtaking is chaotic

I don't know much about the point brake technology.

Only know the corner, in order to maintain the engine speed, to ensure the speed of the corner.

Usually when braking, you should bring a little throttle.

That's why F1 cars don't have a safety gas.