Historically, there have been many commentaries on Li Hongzhang and his person, such as Liang Qichao

China's first-class key figure in the past 40 years.

Li Hongzhang's knowledge is inherently far greater than that of ordinary people.

A little cunning diplomat.

There are a lot of them, both positive and negative, you can read Liang Qichao's "The Biography of Li Hongzhang".

Liang Qichao and Li Hongzhang now most people hold that Liang is a positive character, while Li is basically a negative character. Li Hongzhang stubbornly defended the interests of the Qing court and signed the "Treaty of Shimonoseki" with Japan, which humiliated the country. Liang Qichao and Kang Youwei launched the "Book on the Bus" to assist Emperor Guangxu in promoting the reform of the law.

However, Liang Qichao wrote a biography of Li Hongzhang, saying, "I respect Li Hongzhang's talent, I cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge, and I am sad about Li Hongzhang's encounter." admires Li Hongzhang as a big hero.

The biography commented on Li Hongzhang: "There are only mediocre people in the world who have no blame and no reputation. The people of the world are evil, and the rent is very treacherous.

Known all over the world, Si can be described as a very heroic. Although, there are thousands of people in the world, ordinary people live in it, and extraordinary people are not one of them. Therefore, the reputation is all over the world, and it may not be a hometown wish; Slander the whole world, not necessarily not a great man.

The meaning of this passage is that it is difficult for ordinary people to evaluate a small number of extraordinary people, only mediocre people will be left and right, applauded up and down, and people who really do things cannot be applauded, and there will be controversy.

Liang Qichao went into exile in Japan after the failure of promoting the constitutional monarchy, and his colleague Tan Sitong could have fled like him, but resolutely chose to be generous. Tan Sitong said that it is easy to die, but it is even more difficult to survive and promote change, so let me do the easy things and leave the difficult things to you. How tragic!

However, when Tan Sifeng and the "Six Gentlemen of Wuxu" were beheaded at the entrance of the vegetable market, it is said that the people of Beijing spit in his face and threw vegetables at him.

Is Liang Qichao's escape correct, or is Tan Sitong's approach correct? I'm afraid it's hard to find an answer now.

Two months after Li Hongzhang's death, Liang Qichao wrote the emperor's masterpiece ".Biography of Li Hongzhang"Li Hongzhang must be a figure in thousands of years of Chinese history, and there is no doubt about it." Li Hongzhang must be a figure in the history of the world in the 19th century, and there is no doubt about it. Therefore, those who read modern Chinese history are bound to talk about Li Hongzhang; And those who read Li Hongzhang's biography are bound to hand over the modern history of China!

However, after all, Li Hongzhang was only a "master among the mediocre" in the late Qing Dynasty, and he "did not know the principles of the people, the general trend of the world, and the origin of politics." He learned from the West, and the dream of a rich country and a strong army that he pursued all his life has always stayed at the level of utensils. He did not and could not change the decaying feudal system, so all his efforts were just "building a tower on the sand".

As he himself said, all his life, he was "just a pastemaker, who only knew how to repair a dilapidated house but could not renovate it." Therefore, Liang Qichao thinks that Li "has talent but no knowledge, experience but no blood", he said, "respect Li Hongzhang's talent", "cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge", and "grieve Li Hongzhang's encounter".

It is both affirmative and critical, and it is a pertinent evaluation.

"Xi Zhe has a constant saying: The times create heroes, and heroes also create the times. If Li Hongzhang is a person, I can't say that he is not a hero. Although, it is a hero created for the current situation, and it is not a hero who created the current situation. ”

Li Hongzhang does not know the principle of the people, does not understand the general trend of the world, does not know the origin of politics, when the world of competition and evolution in the 19th century, but only to make up for the seams, steal the peace of the moment, do not expand the strength of the people, put his country in the realm of the prosperity of virtue, but only pick up the fur of Taixi, learn from the source, so that he is self-sufficient, but also coerced the wisdom and small arts, and wants to compete with the famous statesmen of the earth, let the big ones, and compete for the small ones, is it not exhaustive, mediocre and helpful? ......Therefore, I said: Respect Li's talent, cherish Li's knowledge, and grieve Li's encounter.

But since then, there have been those who have attacked Li, and since the situation has changed, then the heroes have also changed, and they should no longer forgive themselves because of the reason why they forgive Li.

I respect Li Hongzhang's talent, I cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge, and I am sad about Li Hongzhang's encounter" - Liang Qichao's comments on Li Hongzhang.

Liang Qichao's evaluation of Li Hongzhang "I respect Li Hongzhang's talent, I cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge, and I am sad about Li Hongzhang's encounter." I think Liang Qichao still respects Li Hongzhang very much.

Liang Qichao's evaluation of Li Hongzhang is quite pertinent, because it not only sees Li Hongzhang's mistakes, but also sees Li Hongzhang's contributions, and also affirms Li Hongzhang's contributions to Chinese history.

Liang Qichao said well: "I respect Li Hongzhang's talent, I cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge, and I am sad about Li Hongzhang's encounter." has admiration for Li Hongzhang, and the evaluation is also very high.

Li He made a parable: Li Hongzhang and Huo Guang. Historians commented that Huo Guang said that he did not learn and did not have skills, and I commented that Li Hongzhang also said that he did not learn and did not have skills. Then Li Hongzhang and Huo Guangguo are in the same stream? Said: Li Hongzhang has no power of Huo Guang and no courage of Huo Guang.

Apropos. The author compares Li Hongzhang with important figures in ancient and modern China and abroad, such as Huo Guang, Zhuge Liang, Qin Hui, Zeng Guofan, Zhang Zhidong, Bismarck, and Ito Hirobumi, and points out that Li Hongzhang also has the heart to die after doing his best, and can endure humiliation and bear heavy burdens.

See "The Biography of Li Hongzhang" - by Liang Qichao.

Personally, I feel that the evaluation is relatively high, after all, Li Hongzhang is also a representative of the Westernization Movement and a figure who promotes development.

Liang Qichao's evaluation of Li Hongzhang, I personally feel that it is more pertinent, and at the same time, Liang Qichao's evaluation does not have any personal bias, it does describe the greatness of Li Hongzhang, and I also see the mistakes of this person.

Liang Qichao wrote a biography of Li Hongzhang, saying, "I respect Li Hongzhang's talent, I cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge, and I am sad about Li Hongzhang's encounter." admires Li Hongzhang as a big hero.

Kang Liang's main contribution lies in thought, it can be said that they are the pioneers of modern Chinese ideological enlightenment, both advocate a constitutional monarchy, but the difference is that Kang is conservative, under the premise of a constitutional monarchy, more "monarchy", and later went back to the old road of maintaining imperial power. Liang Qichao went a little further than his teacher, attached more importance to "constitutionalism" and tended to be more democratic.

As the promoter and leader of the Westernization Movement, Li Hongzhang single-handedly built the basic framework of China's modern industry and laid the foundation of China's modern industry.

Personally, I admire Li Hongzhang, it can be said that Li maintained the Manchu Qing Dynasty for 50 years, read more classics at this time, and write a book is not a problem.

I don't want it. The internet speed is slow and can't go up.

Liang Qichao commented in "The Biography of Li Hongzhang", "I respect Li Hongzhang's talent, I cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge, and I am sad about Li Hongzhang's encounter." "I want to say two things, saying: If you don't learn and don't dare to break the rules, it's your shortcomings; Not avoiding hard work and not being afraid of slander is what he is good at.

It has been in a high position for a long time, but it has reduced the huge China to a second-class country. "In terms of military affairs, Bismarck defeated the enemy country, and Li Hongzhang defeated his compatriots. ”

This is the earliest complete biography of Li Hongzhang. A hundred years later, Liang Qichao's outstanding insight and historical critical vision make this book still the premier masterpiece of Li Hongzhang's biography.

Liang Qichao's "The Biography of Li Hongzhang" is the earliest complete biography of Li Hongzhang

As a person who once wanted to put Li Hongzhang to death, and as the main planner of the plan to assassinate Li Hongzhang during the Gengzi period, Liang Qichao did not stand on the standpoint of personal likes and dislikes, but stood on the height of an era to sympathize with Li Hongzhang. The form of this book is informal, and the penmanship is unbridled and varied, and the atmosphere is magnificent but the ink is as precious as gold. In particular, the last chapter compares Li Hongzhang with ancient and modern Chinese and foreign figures, which is the most intriguing.

Liang Qichao's summary: "I respect Li Hongzhang's talent, I cherish Li Hongzhang's knowledge, and I am sad about Li Hongzhang's encounter" can be described as three points, Liang's words. Or it can be worth someone else's biography of Li Hongzhang.

Liang Qichao's outstanding insight and historical critical vision make this book still the premier masterpiece of Li Hongzhang's biography.

"The Biography of Li Hongzhang" is one of the most famous biographies written by Mr. Liang Qichao. Mr. Liang did not adopt the writing mode of traditional Chinese biography of "all kinds of things are remembered, not praised", but "completely imitated the body of Western biographies, recorded Li Hongzhang's life and deeds, and judged", the whole book narrates Li Hongzhang's life and achievements, and makes an objective and fair evaluation of Li Hongzhang's talent, merits, and status. This book is refreshing, opening a new style of biographical writing and becoming a model work of character biography.

An excellent book, Liang Qichao's Lingyun pen.

Probably not, everyone's essay will have their own thoughts, and there is no article written entirely on the basis of objective facts.

What's more, they are opposing class sides, and the works of politicians are in the service of politics to a certain extent.

But there is also an advantage in objective content.

On September 10, 1983, he met with former British Prime Minister Heath, and he made it clear to Heath that on the Hong Kong issue, I hope that Prime Minister Thatcher and her** will adopt a wise attitude. China's policy of taking back Hong Kong in 1997 will not be disturbed or changed in any way, otherwise we will not be able to pay the bill.

We told our British friends that if I don't solve this problem, I am Li Hongzhang. Whoever doesn't solve this problem is Li Hongzhang.