Debate competition, ask for arguments, read liberal arts is better than science 5

Liberal arts are certainly good bai

You want to ah, Chinese du

Now the so-called liberal arts include humanities subjects such as literature, history and philosophy, and social sciences such as economics, law, politics, management, society, communication, etc., and even art majors, while science includes basic natural sciences and applied engineering and technical sciences (medicine is also among them), these disciplines are knowledge categories that have been accumulated and developed by human beings for a long time, and it is difficult to summarize simply by the words arts and sciences, and I have to admit that Natural science and applied technology have had an immeasurable impact on the history of modern human civilization, but are the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Enlightenment, and even the modern liberal democratic movement not within the scope of liberal arts? Throughout the ages, most of those engaged in politics, art, and even military occupations have been civilians!!

First of all, know bai

The liberal arts and sciences are characterized by what du. The liberal arts focus on reading, while the sciences focus on reverse thinking.

Here are a few things to start with:

1. People who study liberal arts must read a large number of books, be able to talk about the past and the present, and at the same time read ancient and modern books, they will also have certain feelings and ideas, and can learn from the practices of their ancestors. Most people who study science look at ideas with a new way of thinking.

2. Although it is more difficult for people who study liberal arts to find jobs in today's society than those who study science, the salary for students studying liberal arts to find jobs will be higher than that of science students with the same ability.

The lines of the host of the debate tournament are as follows:

1. Please be quiet, the game will start immediately. Good evening, teachers and students. Welcome to the debate competition, I am the moderator, first of all, please allow me to introduce the judges and guests who are here tonight.

Let us once again express our heartfelt thanks to the judges and guests for their presence with warm applause.

2. Let's introduce today's debate topic, today's debate topic is, look at the big screen and learn about the relevant links. Then the source of chaos to invite the two teams to enter. Allow me to introduce the two teams on this hail day, the one on my right is the positive team, and the one on my left is the negative team.

Debate tournament

Debate tournaments are also called debate tournaments, and they are also called debate meetings. In form, it is a kind of competition in which the two parties debate on a certain issue, but in fact, it is a competition of related knowledge, a competition of thinking reflection ability, a competition of language expression ability, and a competition of comprehensive ability.

The core vocabulary of the debate competition is a debate word, just like this debate, one in the middle, one on both sides, each side is a Xin, the debaters on both sides are evenly matched, each side has its own arguments and arguments, and the views of both sides can not completely subjectively judge who is right and who is wrong, and the debaters on both sides will strive for the victory of the debate by virtue of their own eloquent speech, thinking ability and relevant knowledge.

The Great Hall of the People was designed and built by science students, but most of the people sitting inside were liberal arts students!

Liberal arts and sciences have their own merits, and there is no such thing as one being better than the other.

This really can't be organized.

The liberal arts, as its name, are "humanities", which are distinguished from the natural sciences and social sciences, and the humanities, by their characteristics, cultivate people's humanistic qualities, sentiments, temperament and artistry. The world is mainly viewed through the eyes of art, and the natural sciences are viewed by practical arguments (emphasis on data analysis). For example, people who study literature are mostly emotional, and those who study science are rational people.

From the perspective of practicality, the employment direction of liberal arts students is generally teachers, civil servants, graduate schools, and service industries. That is to say, liberal arts students are more eloquent, cheerful, kind, and have strong interpersonal skills. From the point of view of the economic base and superstructure, liberal arts students generally promote the development of the superstructure, that is, the humanities.

The economic base determines the superstructure, the superstructure changes the relations of production, and the relations of production promote the development of the productive forces, that is, the progress of society. Therefore, the two are inseparable, and the industries that science students are engaged in are generally related to the economic base, and the dialectical relationship between the detailed production relations, the productive forces, the economic base, and the superstructure is to be lowered by yourself.

By the way, I am also a liberal arts student, and in the debate competition, the other party may say that the liberal arts are all back. If there is no technical content or denial of the usefulness of liberal arts, I would like to explain that the learning of high Chinese is basically comprehension memory, and it is good to understand it and then use your own words to say it.

I'm a scholar, I'll help you.

1.The liberal arts are very helpful for human development. As the saying goes, philosophy is the science that guides all sciences.

2.The liberal arts education for history and humanities makes people more qualified, that is, the so-called more cultured. Isn't Chinese culture all condensed in liberal arts textbooks?

Positive: I think that loose management will do more good than bad for college students.

The biggest feature of loose management is that in each step of management, it is not necessary to formulate very detailed requirements, the management plan is relatively only a large framework, and there is a relatively large degree of relaxation and freedom in the implementation of management, and loose management does not rely on the manager to control the managed strongly, but to rely on the consciousness of the person being managed. If the management is relaxed, the autonomy of college students in learning can be observed. It can also give college students some time to do what they like and cultivate talents in all aspects, without having to be confined to one circle.

Develop students' independent innovation and divergent thinking, so that students can show their strengths. Therefore, we believe that loose management is more beneficial to college students.

Oppos: I believe that lax management will do more harm than good to college students.

Loose management is not equal to humanized management, the general concept of modern university management is humanized management, we believe that loose management is not a very humanized management, can not be a good realization of the university's educational goals. Secondly, if you adopt loose management, you can't be sure that every student is learning, which may lead to students not learning, and thus chaos will be caused. Therefore, we believe that lax management will do more harm than good to college students.

Catch the audience's eye and make the audience curious to learn about history.

The current era requires innovation, and it should naturally be remade.

1, filming martial arts dramas can evoke memories of the era like grandparents.

2. You can have some understanding of some plots.