LX3 and LX5 are hard to choose

In fact. I don't think there's a need to buy the LX5. If you buy it, it's also because it's not good for vanity or something.

Since the LX3 was launched in 2008, it has not dropped much in price for 3 years, and there has been no replacement, which shows that the LX3 has matured. The LX5 is only a minor repair on the basis of the LX3. For example, the focal length is here again, and it is a small focal length anyway.

Doubling as much doesn't make much of a difference, and besides, the LX3 camera is better suited for taking spectacular scenes. Telephoto shots are generally not required, and although the LX5 has less noise, it is only noticeable when the light is very dark and the ISO is very high. So the function has hardly changed much, but ** is more than 600 yuan higher.

It's really not worth it. Besides, if you're not a professional. The LX3 and LX5 have almost the same form factor.

The functionality is pretty much the same. The same goes for picture quality. When others see your camera, they will only think that your camera is very professional, and they will not care if you are the best.

If you are a professional photographer, add more than 600 to LX3** almost to 4000, at that time 4000 can be ** door SLR, or GF series of better quality. So, if you want to save money, buy the LX3, and if you have more money, you can buy the SLR series directly. It's really not worth buying an LX5.

I hope you'll take my advice.

I bought the LX3 for more than 2700 in February, and recently took a new **.

Interested in adding space with photos

Do you still need to choose this? It's only 500 yuan, and you're thinking about buying the LX series, so this money shouldn't be a problem. Longer focal lengths, newer technology and shape, the battery has also been replaced, and there is less noise than before.

And now that the LX3 is obsolete as soon as it is bought, the LX5 will not have problems for at least three years. In those three years, you have to endure being looked down upon by others and taking pictures.

I bought the LX3, I also recommend you to use the LX3, if you like to try the LX5, if you buy the classic LX3

I feel like it's half a pound to eight taels in terms of shooting quality. Which one is cheaper, you can buy it.

It's definitely LX5, you can compare the night view.

1: If you don't care too much about the camera's telephoto performance, then the Panasonic LX3 completely surpasses Sony's in terms of imaging or limb quality. (Higher pixels, wider wide angles, larger CCD, better macro performance, high-speed continuous shooting, and large aperture effects, who knows who uses them).

2: If there is a lot of demand for telephoto large zoom, then Panasonic's farthest 60mm is a complete defeat compared to Sony's 560mm.

3: The LX5 is a bit better than the LX3, and the shutter speed and stabilization have also changed, so the ability should also be slightly improved. There is also a light change at the far end of 90mm, which can shoot farther.

Everything else is pretty much the same. You can take a closer look at the difference between the two machines and calculate whether the difference between them is worth it or not. This shirt is a matter of opinion.

Personally, I choose the expensive one with a price difference of no more than 300 yuan.