What is a misunderstanding? How can it be improved? 10

What is a misunderstanding of thinking: In fact, there is a difference between misunderstanding and wrong thinking, and misunderstanding is actually a very systematic mistake in thinking, or a group of wrong thinking. In other words, misunderstandings in thinking can withstand scrutiny, and the most important characteristic of misunderstandings in thinking is to draw correct and rigorous conclusions according to a certain pattern.

However, thinking misunderstandings can be avoided, and mastering the correct management strategy is an effective means to avoid thinking misunderstandings in corporate decision-making.

How to improve: The quality of things is only the result of processing, so in the process of dealing with things, have you been exercised, have you summed up some experience and lessons, and what inspiration will these have for your future work and life. Don't be obsessed with structure, in the process.

The explanations in the book are generally more complicated the more you explain...

Thinking misunderstandings are thinking mistakes, and the point is that it is not something that people are born with. Since it's not, how can it be improved? Of course, it can't be improved, only the difference between entering the misunderstanding and not entering the misunderstanding.

Summary. The first mistake is that when you encounter a problem, you want to solve it immediately, and you don't think about and clarify the real problem at all. The second mistake is that when analyzing problems, there is a lack of analytical framework, and only judgments are made based on one's own experience.

The third misconception is to solve problems with huge subjective biases, but biases are not the truth, leading to deviations. In response to these three misunderstandings, the solution corresponds to the first four steps of the five steps to solve the problem. First of all, when we encounter a problem, we should not rush to solve it, but should find a way to clarify and find the essential problem.

Secondly, when we have identified the real problem, we should not blindly use empiricism to solve it, but disassemble the big problem into small problems through some analytical frameworks and models to find the influencing factors of the problem.

The first mistake is that when you encounter a problem, you want to solve it immediately, and you don't think about and clarify the real problem at all. The second mistake is that when analyzing problems, there is a lack of analytical framework, and only judgments are made based on one's own experience. The third misconception is to solve problems with huge subjective biases, but biases are not the truth, leading to deviations.

In view of these three misunderstandings, the solution corresponds to the first four steps of the five steps of solving the problem and solving the hidden comic traces. First of all, when we encounter a problem, we should not rush to solve it, but should find a way to clarify and find the essential problem. Secondly, when we have identified the real problem, we should not blindly use empiricism to solve it, but go through some analytical frameworks and models to disassemble the big problem into small problems and find the influencing factors of the problem.

1. Ignore the problem: I don't think there is a problem here2, lack of responsibility: this problem is not my turn to solve3, tunnel vision: I don't have the answer method to deal with the problem of lifting silver now.

There are three defects in the human mind, one is that the human mind is inert. Thinking consumes energy, and thinking doesn't stay at a good level all the time. Second, thinking is path-dependent.

People are accustomed to solving problems based on experience and knowledge, while ignoring the fact that emerging problems often have different characteristics from existing problems and require new methods to deal with them properly. The third is that the human mind has inherent limitations. Our senses are unable to perceive certain objectively existing things, and therefore cannot directly acquire knowledge about these objective beings.

Because of these three defects, it is very difficult to achieve the unity of knowledge and action, that is, to make people's subjective understanding consistent with objectivity, so Wang Yangming will take it as a necessary cultivation for scholars, which needs to be specially cultivated, rather than being able to do it casually.