How to understand that there are no unqualified students, only unqualified teachers

The person who put forward this sentence itself made a mistake: denying the difference of people, everyone is born with different personalities and characteristics, whether they are in life or learning, they will have different performances, and it is unrealistic to ask the teacher to teach each student according to his aptitude, you can imagine that there are forty or fifty students in a class, how much energy does the teacher have to take care of each student! Unless you turn the teacher into a fairy!

Even the current education does not require everyone to be educated well, it is only required to educate most people, although as a teacher you can't give up on any student, but this is just an ideal; Teachers are also human beings, don't blame teachers for any problems, there are so many problems students are not only the teacher's reasons, family, society, etc. also play an important role!

Before students enter the school, in fact, they are all a blank sheet of paper, and it is through the teacher's education that they slowly learn some knowledge, so there will be such a sentence, there are no unqualified students, only unqualified teachers.

For students, no matter what they grow up like, it is actually the education of both parents and the school that promotes their growth. There is no standard answer for this kind of growth, as long as they can grow into an excellent person, but for teachers, their most important purpose is to teach this knowledge to children, so that they can grow into a knowledgeable person.

From the time children are born, all their knowledge is taught to them by adults. They are taught at home by their parents, and they have school teachers at school to teach them. For children, they don't know what they should grow up to be like, and what they should do in the process of growing up, so for students, the teacher's education is very important.

If you can't educate them well, or if you can't let them receive this knowledge and learn knowledge, then the teacher can actually be said to be an unqualified teacher.

I believe you have also seen some news about teachers on the Internet, some teachers corporal punishment students, some teachers do bad things to students, then, of course, these teachers are unqualified. And in these incidents, the victimized students, they don't know why they became victims, so for the students, they don't have to say whether they are qualified or not. This kind of judgment criterion is very obvious on the teacher, some teachers will insist on teaching the child even if there is a physical problem, but some teachers will do bad things to the child.

This is a very obvious difference, which is why there is this sentence, there are no unqualified students, only unqualified teachers.

I think this sentence is that teachers can't give up on any child, and for those children who don't have good grades, teachers should also find ways to make them better.

I think that a good teacher will develop different study plans for different students, so that even poor students can get better grades.

The meaning of this sentence is that if the student has a bad grade, he will blame the teacher, which is very unreasonable.

The original intention of this sentence should be to urge teachers not to give up on every student. Some people mistakenly believe that teachers are omnipotent.

That is to say, if you don't learn well, you just can't teach well!

Basically agree, but that "student" can't be intellectually retarded.

Disagree, too absolutely.

Some students are born with poor teaching.

I agree with this statement.

As the name suggests, a student is a person who needs to learn and needs to be further improved in all aspects, and is malleable, so there is no problem of disqualification.

A teacher is a person who preaches, teaches, and solves doubts. Only unqualified teachers mean that teachers should work hard, constantly improve their own quality, and be strict with themselves. Students who do not educate well should find the reasons for themselves.

That's what I understand about "there are no unqualified students, only unqualified teachers."

State your personal opinion on this statement.

There is some truth ...... this said

You see, I still agree with the theory of sexual goodness, that is, people are born to be good, everyone is the same, a person becomes bad is nothing more than some of their own experiences, there is nothing wrong with children's skin, anyone will, it's just a bit of a kindergarten, the teachers in elementary schools are more hateful, they will punish or something, and cause psychological shadows to children (you see that my tone is clearly a ...... with shadows.)）

So, you're right!

If you don't agree, how can you put all the blame on the student, is the teacher so humble.

Disagree, only when both are unqualified will a substandard product be created.

I don't agree, otherwise there are no senior teachers and special teachers.