Do you think there is a distinction between high and low level entertainment?

Entertainment is not divided into high and low levels, because entertainment is a very ordinary thing, whether it is high or low, as long as it can make people happy, it is a good thing.

I think there's a difference. High-level entertainment can not only improve one's emotional intelligence and intelligence, but also enrich one's life and emotions. Low-level entertainment is just a complete killing of time.

I think there is, even if it's entertainment, there will be high-level fun and low-level interest, such as those headline parties, or only gossip to get reading, which is relatively low-level.

There should be, low-level entertainment can only be used to pass the time when bored, while high-level entertainment can learn some knowledge.

In every class of society, there will be a distinction between high and low class. So in entertainment, there will definitely be high-level and low-scored. For example, entertainment with low ratings is compared. Not liked.

I don't think there's a difference, high-level entertainment and low-level entertainment are entertainment, no matter how high-level it is, no matter how low-level it is, it's entertainment.

I think there is indeed a distinction between high-level and low-level entertainment, and I think high-level entertainment is a normal pastime, while low-level entertainment is the kind that is disgusting.

I think entertainment is not high-level or low-level, as long as we can feel happy, it is very good entertainment.

I think that entertainment is not high-level or low-level, as long as it can make the person who entertains feel happy, it is good.

I think there may be a distinction between low-level and high-level, such as those first-line stars, and then there are several small stars who can only play supporting roles at all.

I think there will be a distinction between high and low, because maybe happiness is the same, but the way you are happy is different.

I think as long as it's not pornography, gambling and drugs, there's actually no difference. Even within the scope of the law, there is no high or low level of entertainment. As long as you can get happiness through this entertainment, it is actually very advanced.

I think there is a high and low level of any entertainment, because the region is different, if you live in some big cities, your entertainment may be to go to KTV to sing or jump.

In my opinion, most boys like to play basketball and games, and most girls are more accustomed to shopping and eating ......Of course, everyone has their own interests.

I don't think so. Because there are many ways to entertain yourself, as long as you can make yourself happy, of course, there are some ways that cost very much. But that doesn't mean there's a lot of entertainment.

In fact, I personally think that there is no distinction between high and low entertainment methods, but some people divide entertainment methods into high and low, for example, the Maldives is a high-end entertainment method, which ordinary people cannot afford.

Personally, I think that there is no distinction between high and low entertainment itself, and there is no difference. It's all for fun, for fun. However, I still have prejudices in my heart, and I always feel that "reading books" is one level higher than other forms of leisure and entertainment.

Of course, there are low-level entertainment, with some unhealthy content is very bad, disgusting and boring, high-level entertainment, well, in fact, there is no high-level entertainment, of course, the ordinary entertainment is to watch TV, play games.

There will definitely be a distinction between high and low, because different forms of entertainment will make a person appear high-level, or low-level, and low-level entertainment will make you feel vulgar, that is, you don't even want to do such a way.

This view is premised on the premise that there is something similar to the natural nature of man, and that good entertainment is beneficial and bad entertainment is harmful. That's my starting point.

I feel that there are high-end and low-level entertainment, for example, high-level, you can go to some high-end clubs to play, and low-level can also play games at home.

I don't think there's any difference. Some people like to read books for entertainment, some people like to play games for entertainment, and some people think that making money is entertainment. I think you can do whatever you like, there is no superiority or inferiority.

I think of course there are high-level and low-level entertainment, high-level entertainment can entertain the body and mind, but low-level entertainment is harmful to the body and mind.

I feel that there is no such thing as entertainment, because as long as it makes people feel happy and happy, then it is a good form of entertainment.

Personally, I think that there is no distinction between high-level and low-level entertainment, they are just a way for people to relax people, and there is no distinction between high and low games.

Entertainment is divided into high-level and low-level, high-level entertainment gives people positive energy, positive energy, and makes people better, while low-level entertainment will make people degenerate.

I think that there are good and bad entertainment, good entertainment can promote physical and mental health, and bad entertainment can indulge people's minds, and this idea has a premise that there is something similar to the natural nature of human beings, and good entertainment is beneficial to it, and bad entertainment is harmful to it.

I think of course there are high-level and low-level, because entertainment, there are high-level, low-level, high-level, high-level, that is, the kind of more elegant spiritual life, and the low-level is the kind of vulgar.

I think there are high-level and low-level entertainment, high-level entertainment is very connotative, entertainment is very decent, but low-level entertainment is particularly chaotic and unruly!

The difference is that high-level entertainment can improve one's IQ and emotional intelligence, and can enrich one's life. And the so-called low-level entertainment, such as Douyin, is just a pastime in life.

I think low-level entertainment is just to pass the time, while high-level entertainment can learn something.

I think the difference between high-end entertainment and low-level entertainment is the change of people, I hate that kind of low-level entertainment, it's too gaudy.

I think the biggest difference between high-end entertainment and low-end entertainment comes from the audience's love for them. What the audience likes is high-end entertainment, and what the audience doesn't like is the low-level fish, because now the best ones are the audience.

I don't think this difference can be clearly distinguished, it depends on the individual's understanding. It seems to me that it has passed, and it is like that. It's more formal, and low-level entertainment just wants to win attention, but ignores the facts.

The difference between high-level entertainment and low-level entertainment is in their process, and high-level entertainment may be produced with some advanced equipment.

Of course, the impact on people is different, and high-end entertainment can make people more physically and mentally happy.

I think the difference is that everybody has the way they enjoy this kind of entertainment, because there are so many different ways of having this kind of entertainment.

I think that as long as entertainment is not illegal, high-end entertainment and D-level entertainment are treated equally, and I think it can make people feel happy.

75, I think the difference between them should be the difference in acting, or whether they are liked by many people.

It's not about the low level or the high level, there is no high level in the world, only the low level. The high level we see is the accumulation of the low level. In today's online world, there are actually only two numbers in it:

0 and 1. In the vast and infinite digital world, only two numbers, 0 and 1, can form an infinite digital world, but infinite numbers cannot form a digital world. The 24-story high-rise building is made up of bricks, steel bars, and cement layer by layer, and the brick on the top floor is exactly the same as the brick on the first floor, which is fired in a kiln, and you can't see that the bricks on the 24th floor are any different from the bricks on the first floor, and the bricks on the 24th floor are high-grade bricks, and the bricks on the first floor are low-grade bricks.

Therefore, the level of the 24th floor and the level of the 1st floor are the same level, and there is no distinction between high and low. In fact, the quality of the product is also like this, there is no distinction between high and low. In our daily life, we say that the product is bad and the quality is high, but it is actually caused by different materials, not low-level and high-level.

It's the same with people. The difference between an ordinary person and a celebrity is the celebrity's knowledge, deep resume. After he became a celebrity, he needed to eat and sleep like ordinary people.

When you go to bed in the middle of the night, you can't see any difference between celebrities and ordinary people.

There is a problem here that you have not made clear, that is, the so-called important, whose importance it is, what position it is important, and which meaning and direction it is important, and without this background and environment analysis, the so-called importance does not exist.

It can also be said the other way around, which is important to you, which is important to you, hands and feet, and which is important to you, eyes and ears, but if you are already trapped in the rubble and cannot save yourself by constantly handing your hands, then which one do you say is important?

Importance itself is a comparison, a trade-off, a place in a certain environment and value system, rather than a reality. So, your question is a bit problematic.

I think this kind of low and high standard is different from person to person, after all, everyone has a different opinion, and there is no absolute definition to define this high and low level of art.

On the contrary, I think Li Ronghao is a very thoughtful mentor, and it can be seen very clearly from the last battle between him and Wang Leehom, Li Ronghao is not a star and a half stronger than Wang Leehom in terms of choosing songs, and he even gave me such a feeling that Li Ronghao's purpose is to inject fresh blood into the Chinese music scene, and he can choose some songs that are suitable for him according to the characteristics of different people.

For example, the madman he chose for Xing Hanming has been a great success, although her voice is a little weird, but I think she will look very advanced when she sings this song, after all, there is no such singer in the current Chinese music scene.

For example, your tavern closed me, and this song is also very suitable for that singer's voice, but some netizens don't buy it, because this is an Internet song, so they say that Li Ronghao has no depth and is not advanced, which is completely irresponsible.

Who told you that online songs can't be on Daya, like Xu Song, isn't he an online singer debut? So it doesn't matter where you come from, what you care about is the song, as long as your song is advanced, the performance you present will naturally become advanced.

But on the other hand, Wang Leehom can't do it, I think Wang Leehom is simply playing a game, but you have to know that a talent show, if it only has this purpose, then this talent show can be said to be a very failure.

What the public likes is the best, and what the public likes may not be considered high-end.

I understand that high art is sung by singers who are recognized by the public and have a high position; The low-level standard is a song sung by someone unknown on some platform.

I don't think there is a high or low level in art. Even if there is, it is defined according to the audience's affection.

I don't think there is a standard for high or low, everyone has different opinions, different thoughts, and different definitions of art, so I think there is no standard.

I don't think there's anything advanced and low at all. There are no standards, everyone has their own different standards, just like the public, the public likes it, that is good.

I don't know what art is, in my ** world, I think the so-called high and low standards should be decided by the audience, that is, whether it is in line with the mood and whether the singing is in the hearts of the masses in winter.

First, the meaning is different.

1. Low-level taste: It is used to describe people's taste is very vulgar, and they like to do some behaviors that cannot be on the elegant hall.

2. High-level taste: Contrary to the meaning of low-level taste, it is mostly used to describe people's elegant taste.

Second, the usage is different.

1. Low-level interest: refers to the part of human beings that is relatively initial, inherent, and common to all animals in the process of animal evolution.

There are always some people in society who take advantage of their own low-level tastes and think about the noble mood of others. From Liu Qing's "History of Entrepreneurship", Part 1, Chapter 2.

2. Advanced interest: harmless accumulation of interest that points to a virtuous circle. Such as:

Constant pursuit of high-class fun.

Third, the meaning of the word color is different.

1. Low-level fun: derogatory terms.

2. Advanced fun: mostly used as a compliment.