Focus 1 8 manual low configuration Cruze 1 6 manual low configuration Sega 1 6 manual low configurat

From the point of view of value for money, Sega, Fox, Cruze.

The Cruz naturally inhales too meaty, the Fox has high fuel consumption and rough workmanship. Sega is fully equipped, the workmanship is acceptable, and the power is acceptable.

I can't even think about it, the Focus has good power, it's beautiful, and the car I just mentioned in January The Focus is very powerful.

Classic Focus is recommended, the Cruze is not powered enough, and if you turn on the air conditioner again, it will be more difficult to speed up and accelerate.

If you want to control the power, it is recommended that the Fox Cruze have poor power, and it is better to choose the Focus.

The Cruz is not your average meat. If you drive in the city, you can be by starting faster. The power of the Focus is good, of course, at the cost of waste oil

First of all, I have to explain to you that the positioning of the Focus of the sedan and the Focus of the hatchback is different. Including the old Fox as well. The Focus of the hatchback is on the sporty side, while the sedan is on the comfort side.

A focus on movement (i.e., control) and comfort are often at odds with a focus on comfort. So how to choose is up to you to weigh which side of the balance of control and comfort is more in your mind.

If you choose to handle, there's no doubt that the hatchback Focus is the number one family car in this price range. And believe me, although the new Focus Hatchback is more handling, it has also been improved in terms of comfort, at least not as hard as the old Focus to embarrass you. For the family, as long as you don't ask for it with a car like Tiida, Civic, and Sutar, which is positioned as comfortable in itself, it will definitely not disappoint you too much.

If you choose comfort, I'd recommend going for the Cruze – the Cruze will also be slightly more dynamic than the Fox. And the new sedan you can understand as a compromise between the comfort of the Cruze and the sportiness of the hatchback Focus.

In terms of space, Cruze will have a slight advantage. In terms of front-row space, Cruze and Fox may be about the same. But in the back, Cruze has a little more legroom than Fox.

Both cars are actually more leathery cars, and the door panel seats are relatively thick, and space will certainly not be a strong point compared to some thin leather cars. Cruze is a little better, it's a big one.

A manual... An automatic... I think it's all good.

I think Cruze is better.

The styles of the two cars are actually very different.

As far as ** is concerned, the ** of the car is actually very standard for a penny price and a penny, which is no longer mentioned.

The value retention rate of the two cars is not equal, but the later ownership of Cruz still has a good increase, and the value retention rate has a relatively large guarantee.

The cost of maintenance, Cruz is indeed a little higher.

But as far as the style of the two cars is concerned, one is sporty, the other is more suitable for home, and if you are young, it is better to choose Cruz, and the simple modification in the later stage, as well as the embodiment of personal style, are all good cars.

Fuel consumption Cruz is actually on par with Sega, mainly depending on the driving conditions.

But in terms of the handling and stability of the two cars, Cruz still has a certain advantage, and the stability of the ground suspension, Cruz is also better, which you can feel when telling cornering.

Cruise control, how to say this, he is still just staying at the stage where it is easier to use at high speed, if you are indoors, basically do not need to think about it, indoor use of cruise control, I personally think it will increase the danger of driving.

The price of the Cruze can buy Sega high, which is nothing comparable.

If you emphasize the high cost performance, Sega this car is very suitable to start with, and the quality is also good.

If you are at home, you don't like to toss, you can buy a Cruze.

Both cars are good, the Cruz looks good and the new Sega is good value for money.

It depends on the preference of the landlord.

I have a colleague who bought a Sega.

It's very comfortable to drive.

As for the skylight. I bought it and used it a few times.

I personally recommend Cruze. The appearance is young and fashionable, cost-effective, and there are few minor problems. . .

Three nice cars with very, very close performance.

First of all, I'm a Focus owner, but I personally feel that the Cruze has the best appearance of the three. It is very suitable for young people who are chasing the trend, but because it is only the first to come out, it will take time to prove its advantages and disadvantages.

In terms of fuel consumption, the AT version of the three cars is relatively high, especially the Cruze and Focus, and the Sega AT is slightly better, but it is not obvious.

The MT version is evenly matched. Because Fox is yes, the other two are yes. It depends on the landlord's preference. When buying a car, you will enjoy a little early policy discount. But the weight of these three cars is not light, so the displacement is not recommended.

The Focus 09 model is not much in itself, but there are problems in a small number of batches, and many owners are related to their own driving skills.

Of the three cars, both the Focus and the Sega have a WRC racing pedigree, especially the Focus, which is also its selling point.

Fox ** is the cheapest, has the largest number of holdings, and the corresponding maintenance costs are slightly lower.

You asked about the quality, this is really not good, in fact, buying a car sometimes has a little bit of luck, the well-known domestic processing technology is not as good as abroad, and the quality of oil is also poor. For example, I only go to Shell for refueling, and I resolutely do not go to PetroChina. After adding a few times to PetroChina, I felt that the vehicle was weak, and I wondered if the car was out of Mao Xian and knew that Jian was sick.

Brother pants. In fact, I recommend you to go to the "Autohome" to see the comparison of specific performance and configuration, the parameters are very detailed, and the subtle differences between each other are clear at a glance. It's more telling than if I'm typing a thousand words here.

If you are only optimistic about these three cars, my advice to you is: if you are young and vigorous, and follow the trend, choose the Cruze, if you think you are very man, choose the Focus for one group, and choose the Sega for the rest.

The three cars may as well be purchased completely according to personal preferences, because the difference between the appearance and ** is really too small.

PS: Upstairs manual MT

FKS drove 12 fuel consumption, I really admire it? I have a few grades worse than Qingdao in traffic congestion in Chengdu (I have been to Qingdao n times), my urban area is 7-8, and the best situation of the highway is 5, generally about 6-7.

Wide wheels have the advantages and disadvantages of wide wheels, wide tires are not suitable for use in the city, wide tires are noisy, Focus hatchback is wide, sedan is narrow.

Anyway, it's quite cheap to add the original factory for cruise control, so I don't believe it's good to check it yourself.