SLR, does the body still need lens stabilization?

Both can be used at the same time, but it's best not to use them! Sony and Pentax are typical of this category.

If it is a lens with a Sigma lens, it is good to open one of them, and if you open both at the same time, you can only say that you have Parkinson's, which is much worse than not opening, and it is basically mushy. In both cases, lens stabilization is much better than in-body stabilization, which has a delay. I used the Pentax K5 and the Nikon D700, and the two were compared.

Introduction: With the development of digital technology, digital technology has appeared among us. Lens image stabilization is to use the in-lens motor to drive the gyroscope to correct the displacement of the lens and compensate for the shake; The fuselage stabilization is achieved by the displacement of the sensory element CCD COMS.

Lens stabilization allows you to visually see the correction of the image in the viewfinder, while body stabilization does not. In-body stabilization can be applied to any lens, and in that sense, it is true that you can save some money on advanced stabilization lenses, but the effect of in-body stabilization may not be very stable when using different lenses.

In addition, the lens image stabilization brands of SLR cameras include Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, and others. Sony, Pentax, Samsung, etc. use body stabilization.

Introduction to DSLR digital cameras.

SLR digital camera refers to single-lens reflex digital camera, that is, digital digital, single, lens lens, reflex reflex English abbreviation DSLR. Representative models in the market are commonly found in Nikon, Canon, Pentax, Fujifilm, etc. These cameras are generally larger and heavier.

SLR refers to single lens reflex, or SLR (Single Lens Reflex), which is the most popular viewfinder system today, and most 35mm cameras use this kind of car viewfinder. In this system, the unique design of the mirrors and prisms allows the photographer to observe the image passing through the lens directly from the viewfinder. As a result, the same image that the film is about to "see" can be seen accurately.

From the perspective of stabilization itself, Canon's stabilization lens does not require ...... for Canon's own DSLR bodyAs long as the lens stabilization function is turned on and the lens can communicate with the camera body normally, both the lens itself and the lens stabilization function can work normally without any special settings.

Image stabilization is a standard feature in today's digital cameras. In order to improve the production rate, any camera manufacturer will equip their camera with the ...... of stabilization functionIt's just that, some manufacturers have done the anti-shake function in the fuselage, and some manufacturers have done the anti-shake function in the lens, and some are double repairs, both the fuselage and the lens have been stabilized, which function is enabled, depending on the specific configuration of the fuselage and lens.

As far as Canon's lens stabilization function is concerned, it is a ...... that does not require the bodyOwn lenses, own body, perfectly compatible. As long as the lens is attached to the body, it will work fine. As long as the stabilization function is turned on, the stabilization function will work normally.

There is no need for any special settings, and no other equipment is required.

However, for Canon SLR cameras, there are really ...... requirements in terms of the combination of the body and lens

Canon's half-frame SLR body can be used with both half-frame and full-frame SLR lenses.

Canon's full-frame SLR body can be used with a full-frame SLR lens, but not with a half-frame SLR lens! ......This is crucial! This is because, if you attach a Canon half-frame SLR lens to a Canon full-frame SLR body, it will break the ...... of the reflector

Of course, this problem has nothing to do with the stabilization of the lens......

There are no requirements, as long as it can be installed and the body communicates normally with the lens, it can have an anti-shake function.

There's no requirement It's just that you buy a new model and the focusing accuracy is a little better than the old one.

No, IS anti-shake is a physical structure.

Stabilization has nothing to do with the body.

It doesn't matter if it's APSC or full-frame.

are all adaptable. If it is, it can be transferred to a micro mirror.

It can also work with the body to stabilize the shake.

What is not required for Canon is lens stabilization and the body has nothing to do with it.

As far as the description is concerned, there is none. Body stabilization and lens stabilization are two concepts.

I don't know how to continue asking, satisfied.

Does the stabilization lens have requirements for the SLR itself? Some!

Reading your question makes me very embarrassed. I use Sony products with body stabilization, but I yearn for Nikon products, and it would be nice if Nikon had body stabilization.

As far as the effect of image stabilization is concerned, the body and lens image stabilization,** are the same.

From an economic point of view, lens stabilization means that you have to invest repeatedly in stabilization, and in-body stabilization does not have this problem. But lens stabilization means that your lens can be used on a variety of new and old machines, which is good for interacting with friends.

So I think that if you use it yourself, the form of stabilization doesn't matter, and you can't buy a few lenses anyway.

3000-4000 yuan, only Sony's A200 double-ended set machine is the most suitable. The machine is a fuselage image stabilization, with 18-70, 75-300 two lenses, wide focal length, good image quality, and excellent performance in the sleeve.

If you wait, you can also buy Sony's new product, the A230. If you can accept only one small focal length lens, that is, a single-head set machine, you may be able to buy Sony's A350.

In addition, between 4000-5000, there is also Canon's 450D single-head sleeve machine to consider.

The fuselage or lens, this one is not involved, some fuselages have anti-shake, some lenses have anti-shake, at this time, just choose the lens according to your own strength, of course, if you have both, that's the best.

Hehe, landlord, there is only one possibility for this situation: Olympus's anti-shake body distribution Panasonic's anti-shake lens, and other manufacturers either only have body anti-shake, or only lens anti-shake. The lens mount used by Olympus and Panasonic is the same, which is why there is a ...... where the two stabilizations collide togetherAnd the results weren't as rosy as you might think – one had to be turned off to work properly – at least for now.

The principle is different, lens stabilization is to deflect the light and adapt the position of the imaging to the position of the sensor. In-body stabilization is the movement of the sensor to adapt the sensor position to the position of the image.

The stabilization component of lens stabilization is installed in the lens, and each stabilization lens requires a set of stabilization systems.

The anti-shake component of the fuselage is installed in the fuselage, and the user's investment cost is low.

The structural differences are nothing.

The biggest difference between them is in use.

The image stabilization effect of the lens is visible in the viewfinder. The stabilization effect of the body stabilization is only visible when the shooting is complete.

When using a telephoto lens, in-body stabilization is a problem, and lens stabilization is just as fast regardless of the focal length.

Therefore, most mainstream SLRs use lens image stabilization, and only Sony Olympus uses body image stabilization

Nikon and Canon's DSLRs currently do not have body image stabilization, and some lenses of these two major brands do.

Sony's entire body is equipped with image stabilization, so that the lens can not need image stabilization, and the cost will be cheaper. After all, the cost of anti-shake lenses is higher.

1. There is a big difference between lens stabilization and non-stabilization. It can be said in two ways:

The difference between lens stabilization and body stabilization. Lens stabilization works when the shutter is pressed halfway to keep the frame stable. Body stabilization is an anti-shake that shifts through the sensor at the moment of shooting, and can only work at the moment of shooting.

This is also a key factor in Canon and Nikon's insistence on using lens image stabilization. However, at present, the "five-axis image stabilization" function has been developed for body image stabilization, and the traditional lens image stabilization has not yet followed up.

The stabilization of the lens or body can generally reach the level of increasing the shutter speed by three to four stops, creating favorable conditions for handheld shooting. Long focal length lenses without stabilization often need to rely on a tripod to shoot sharp ** due to the limitation of "safe shutter" (the shutter speed must reach the reciprocal of the focal length to exclude the effect of hand shake on **sharpness).

2. Lenses with lens stabilization are mostly found in Canon and Nikon lens groups. The lens model identification is named IS and VR, respectively.

There is a safety shutter for taking pictures, which is roughly the reciprocal of the focal length of the lens, such as 18-135 lenses, using 18 ends, the safety shutter is 1 18 seconds, and the 135 end is 1 135 seconds.

The shutter is lower than the reciprocal of the focal length, which may reflect the beating of the heart, breathing and shaking of the hand to **, ** will be "paste".

This person is just a person, and the person who has practiced the iron hand skills well, the safety shutter can be relatively low.

Generally, the stabilization can make the ** 3-4 stops lower than the safety shutter not "mush".

In addition, there are two types of image stabilization: body image stabilization and lens image stabilization.

Fuselage anti-shake is the displacement of the image sensor to correct the shake,This anti-shake effect is only reflected in the **,The effect is not visible from the viewfinder。 Machines with in-body stabilization have stabilization using any lens, and the cost of stabilization is relatively low.

Lens stabilization relies on the displacement of the lens stabilization component to achieve stabilization, and you can intuitively see the stabilization effect in the viewfinder. On the other hand, because each lens needs to have its own anti-shake component, the lens ** is relatively high, usually 1000 more expensive than the same specification without anti-shake

According to the safety shutter, it is recommended that standard zoom lenses such as 18-55 should be used without an anti-shake lens. For telephoto lenses such as 70-200, image stabilization is more necessary.

In addition, some card machines also have pseudo-image stabilization such as "natural image stabilization" and "electronic image stabilization", which is to improve iOS sensitivity and sacrifice image quality to achieve a safe shutter, which is meaningless.

In the presence of a stabilizer, is the body stabilization and lens stabilization useful?

It depends, but in terms of the current photography trend, the stabilization system is still very useful, because most people and even professional photographers prefer to shoot handheld, but it doesn't have to be lens stabilization.