Pro or anti cloning?

If yes, unless I'm crazy.

Cloning technology makes the survival and reproduction of human beings beyond the norms of natural selection, so that people who master cloning technology can intervene in human evolution on a large scale, and the loss and mutation of genes are decided by individuals, rather than society and nature, which may lead to some people with ulterior motives using this technology to modify human beings by chance.

Human cloning is a meaningless research topic, and contemporary biological history proves that cloning technology can only reproduce organisms with the same appearance characteristics, and cannot clone the original talents of the copied person. Only then can people's minds be conditioned by nurture. Therefore, even if someone can clone a figure who resembles a great leader or great scientist in history, but only in appearance, but lacks the thought, temperament, and talent of a great leader and a great scientist, what is the significance of such a clone?

As for the arguments that have been made of human beings for the purpose of obtaining human organs for the transplantation of human organs in medicine, this is also not feasible. Because the cloned person is first and foremost a citizen, he enjoys human rights, and if the cloned person refuses to donate organs, you cannot violate human rights. As for cloning a headless person, that's also unrealistic, because in order for a clone to survive, he must first eat and think, and it is impossible to have a headless head, so we can't cultivate a headless vegetative person, right?

Moreover, the most important thing is that human cloning does not conform to the conditions of the world and the country, and the population of the world is swelling rapidly, and many countries have implemented family planning to control population growth. As the German Minister of Research and Technology, Rütgers, put it: "The copying of human beings will not be allowed and will not happen." ”

Possible causes.

1. The identity of the cloned human is difficult to determine, and the relationship between them and the cloned person cannot be incorporated into the existing ethical system.

2. Cloning technology may be abused and become a tool for ****.

3. Clones may have psychological defects due to their special identity and form new social problems.

4. Cloning technology is still immature, and human cloning may have many congenital physiological defects.

Because human cloning is an act that violates the spirit of the Constitution and criminal law.

As far as China is concerned, the state implements planned impulse reproduction, and human natural production is restricted, and there is no need to carry out another experiment in population production. Moreover, the natural reproduction capacity of our population is very strong, and there is no need to create a population by cloning. Therefore, the research on human cloning in our country is contrary to the Family Planning Law.

At the same time, the Law Committee of the 59th session of the United Nations General Assembly in 2005 voted to adopt a statement urging all States to prohibit any form of human cloning that is contrary to human dignity, including embryonic cell cloning for the purpose of medical research. However, this statement is not binding.

Indeed, cloning technology may be as beneficial as atomic technology, which can be both beneficial and harmful. But the essence of "technology fear" is the fear of misuse of technology, not the fear of technology itself.