How to copy materials in the essay exam, and how to copy materials in the argument

The method of copying materials is as follows:1. It is a prerequisite to review the questions thoroughly: reviewing the question stem is an important prerequisite for answering the argument, and it can also find a direction for how to use the materials.

In the examination of questions, candidates must understand the content of the question stem, and clarify the descriptions they need to find in the materials for the conventional questions such as practices, measures, problems, meanings, etc.

2. Appropriate abbreviation should be mastered: In the process of using materials to reduce sentences, the words that are modified in the materials and do not affect the expression of the core content of the main points can be appropriately deleted, and "copied" on the premise of retaining the key points and not affecting the integrity of the core content of the main points.

3. Comprehensive generalization is the key: when grasping the case-based materials, you can find a sentence related to the question stem from the material, combine the thinking mode of the first angle, and contact the question stem questioning method, so as to get the answer. When refining the main sentence and the summary sentence, you can refine the summary sentence according to the total score relationship between the main points, the logical relationship between the total score and the juxtaposition of the paragraph, and the refinement of high-frequency words in a certain paragraph or some key points, so as to make yourself "copy" better.

If the material is copied, the essay may be rated as a category 3 or 4 essay, and the score will not be very high.

Descriptions of common scoring.

Under normal circumstances, there will be the following scoring items, and supplementary explanations will be made to the scoring rules. If the title is not written or the specified title is not written, 2-3 points will be deducted; If more than two-thirds of the materials are copied mechanically, the score is generally about 15 points; If the previous objective questions are directly concretized and systematized and the argumentation is insufficient, points will be given according to the three types of papers and below.

If the number of words is less than 500 words, it should generally be under the score of the three types of papers. Finally, it should be clear that the marker will give points mainly according to the number of arguments, profundity and relevant scoring standards when marking the papers, and in the text, if there are outstanding highlights, high scores or special points will be given.

Grasp the main body] The main body in the material is Xiao Han and Xiao Zhang.

Their situation is that at present, China's public welfare undertakings are facing the embarrassment that it is difficult for donors to be well satisfied.

Talking about practice] The two mainly set up a passer-by company to solve social problems by commercial means.

Find the results] enable donors, commercial institutions and recipients to form a good closed loop of public welfare value, mutual benefit and win-win.

The combination is: at present, China's public welfare undertakings are facing the embarrassment that the psychology of donors is difficult to be well satisfied, so Xiao Han and Xiao Zhang set up a company to solve social problems by commercial means, so that donors, commercial institutions and recipients can form a good closed loop of public welfare value, mutual benefit and win-win.

Therefore, when we use the material cases in the materials, we can state them according to the method of [subject + situation + practice + result], and then analyze it in combination with our own thinking. In this way, not only does the case increase the vividness of the article, but also the logic is greatly improved.