Those who understand the relevant laws come, and those who understand the laws come?

This answer is chosen by the questioner and does not represent the opinion of the person who knows it.

Bamboo has knots. Senior.

April 16 15:52 Aiding suicide refers to the fact that another person has suicidal intent, and the perpetrator gives him mental support or encouragement, so as to strengthen his suicidal intention and determination; or material assistance, such as providing tools for suicide, helping to commit suicidal acts, etc., so that others can achieve their suicidal intentions. In judicial practice, in the former case, the person is generally not held accountable for homicide.

In the latter case, due to the implementation of the act, it has a more direct role in promoting the occurrence of the death of the suicide person. Therefore, if the act of helping others is more harmful to society and the circumstances are more serious, it is usually found to be intentional homicide. However, since the suicide is decided by the will of the person who committed suicide, the helper may be given a lighter or mitigated punishment; For those who are less harmful to society and whose motives or behaviors are not vile, they may also not be punished as crimes.

Case: Since Wang and his wife Li got married, they often beat and scolded Li. One day, Wang hit Li again, Li couldn't bear it and cried:

It is better to live and suffer than to die! "If you fight again, I'll die for you." Wang said:

If you want to die, you can die, if you want to hang yourself, there is a rope at home, and if you want to drink medicine, I will buy it. Li said, "Drink the medicine."

Wang really went to the supply and marketing cooperative, bought a bottle of pesticides, handed it to Li, and then left home. When he returned home at night, Wang found that Li had committed suicide by drinking medicine. After the incident, the judicial authorities prosecuted Wang for intentional homicide.

Wang believed that Li had committed suicide and that he was not guilty. May I ask: Does Wang's behavior constitute a crime?

In this case, Wang's wife, Li, had the intention to commit suicide because she could not endure Wang's beating, and at the same time, when Li expressed her intention to commit suicide, Wang, as her husband, instead of stopping it, said things such as "hang yourself with a rope" and "I'll buy the medicine", which obviously played a role in further promoting and strengthening Li's suicide intention; After Wang bought the pesticide and handed it to Li, he subjectively had an attitude that he didn't care whether Li lived or died, which was in line with the subjectivity of the crime of intentional homicide, and his homicidal intent was indirect intent, that is, he knew that his actions might cause the death of others, but let the death result happen. In the end, Li committed suicide by taking pesticides. Looking at the case as a whole, Wang regarded his wife's life and death as child's play, and actively carried out the act of helping his wife commit suicide, causing the serious consequences of his wife's suicide, which should be a serious circumstance, has constituted a crime, and should be punished criminally.

It is undoubtedly correct for the judicial authorities to pursue criminal responsibility for intentional homicide.

1. From a legal point of view, as long as your decoration behavior does not produce infringement and does not hinder the normal production and life of others, others will not hinder or hinder your normal decoration behavior.

2. Since it is adjacent, especially if the other party is pregnant, try to negotiate with it to reach an understanding, take effective measures to solve the corresponding obstacles or influences, and take measures to eliminate and avoid pollution and noise in the decoration behavior.

3. Residents' modification behaviors will generally be reported to the community property management or neighborhood committee, and construction will be carried out after approval. This can be explained to the appropriate management organization at the time of filing, and they will coordinate it. In short, because he is pregnant, he does not allow his neighbors to decorate the house, which is too domineering.

Moreover, the way to avoid harm can be chosen by both parties, and the other party can choose another residence in a short period of time (negotiation time), if you give convenience or friendship compensation for the difference, it is also a very good choice.

You are not responsible. Renovation is a normal practice, as long as it is during working hours. If there is a problem with the other pregnant woman, it has nothing to do with you.

When you are three months pregnant, you can't ban your neighbors from decorating your house, which is too domineering!

There is no provision in our law that a neighbor is not allowed to decorate because she is pregnant.

This pregnant woman is too pretentious! It's not this woman's habitual miscarriage, borrowing the neighbor's decoration to make people take the blame!