The Ming and Qing dynasties were criticized, why didn t they replace it for a long time?

The reason why the Baguwen during the Qing Dynasty has been criticized for a long time, and no one can replace it, is because it represents universal values. At the same time, he also involves the interests of the world's scholars, so it cannot be easily changed. <>

1. Universal view.

The disadvantages of Baguwen have been criticized by people, which only exists in the eyes of a small number of peopleIn the eyes of most people, although Baguwen is very hateful, and at the same time he is not very practical, but he is recognized in universal values, which is why Bao Guwen is disliked, but cannot be changed, precisely because he represents the interests of most people, and the opposition of a small number of people does not play a decisive role, and the ruler also needs to wrap up to screen talents for him, so in the feudal society at that time, Baguwen could not be completely replaced, At the same time, rulers are reluctant to take such risks to change their electoral system. The universal view is the most fundamental driving force that determines the trend of the times, and the disadvantages of the Baguwen that are disliked by people are the views of people of insight. <>

2. It involves the interests of the majority of the people in the world.

Although Baguwen is a less practical electoral system, but it represents the interests of the world's scholars, it is precisely because of the existence of Baguwen, so the world's scholars have the opportunity to enter the court as officials, which is why the ruler is reluctant to change it, this is a deep-rooted practice, but also a relatively fair electoral system recognized by everyone. The books and other knowledge used in ancient songs have been passed down from generation to generation, and they are also used from generation to generation, and if the content of the ancient music is suddenly changed, then in the eyes of those candidates who have been preparing for decades, it seems that this has touched their interests, so this kind of thing is a difficult thing to reconcile, and it is difficult to make changes. <>

To sum up, although the eight-strand text of the Ming and Qing dynasties had drawbacks, it could not be easily changed, because it involved the interests of the vast majority of people, and if it was changed, it was likely to cause considerable changes.

Because this method of selecting talents is too inefficient, and it is likely to make people's thinking fixed.

Because Bagu Wen is not as rigid as we imagined, although there are many drawbacks in using Bagu to take scholars, it is also the easiest to see the level of students, and it can screen students well.

Although the Ming and Qing dynasties were criticized, the Bagu scholars still had the value and significance of their existence at that time, because the Bagu text ensured the fairness of the examination.

Because of the eight-strand literary system of the imperial examination, many literati spent their whole lives on the Four Books and Five Classics, forming a serious shackle.

The Eight Units are the selection of state reserve officials, not the selection of literati. Literati and officials are different, splashing ink can be used with a pen, but governing the country is to complete the optimal solution under limited conditions. Naturally, there is no such thing as imprisonment, any system follows the characteristics of that era, and the ancients were first-class cattle people in governing the country.

As for the judgments of later generations, most of them are not pertinent, and they are all fanatics. Take its essence to remove its dross, according to the situation, from time to time. This is a profound cultural treasure of China.

There are too many things prescribed by the Eight Shares, and there are many restrictions, and if the literati want to pass the Eight Shares, they must give up a lot of their own thoughts, and over time, they really don't have their own thoughts.

Because the Baguwen fixed people's minds, some scientific students could not write their own thoughts.

Reasons for the abolition of the eight-share document:

Impact on Academics:

The title, content, and format of the eight-strand essay are too restrictive. The candidates only wrote perfunctory according to the literal meaning of the question, thus stifling the author's creativity. As a result, the content of the eight-strand essay is empty, and the form of the lecture has become a play on words.

In order to gain fame, scholars specialized in studying and analyzing Bagu Wen, but the restrictions on Bagu Wen were too strict, and the topics were limited to scriptures, which constrained the minds of scholars, and Cheng Zhu Yili's learning gradually ossified under the guidance of the imperial examination system. Gu Yanwu said: "The harm of the eight shares is equivalent to burning books, and the corruption of talents is even greater than that of the suburbs of Xianyang, and there are more than 460 people who are pitted."

Impact on Politics:

Scholars "don't listen to things outside the window, and only read the books of sages and sages", and spend their whole lives studying the writing of Baguwen, lacking an understanding of politics and the actual social situation. Some scholars also lack an understanding of human affairs and affairs, and once they become officials, they lack sufficient knowledge to deal with civil affairs, so they have no choice but to appoint staff masters and lower-level officials to make decisions on matters, which makes the rule of officials increasingly corrupt and difficult to get on the political track.

I have a better answer, but you're anonymous, insincere, and boring.

A more rigid and meaningless style of writing is not only useless, but also closes people's minds, how not to abolish it.

Baguwen is not so terrifying, Baguwen is just a writing mode, and the reason why it has been criticized by so many people is that the main reason is that it is used by the ruling class, requiring that the exam must be answered with Baguwen, plus Baguwen is difficult to learn, so it is naturally regarded by many people as a flood beast, in fact, those who are interested in Baguwen can study, and those who are not interested can not study, it's as simple as that.

It's very simple, for example, a math problem, ask you to memorize the answer, and then write it down during the exam, which is the imperial examination (that is, the eight-strand text), no need to think, you say that the fee is not divided?

In a word, if you can't catch up with the requirements of the times, you will be eliminated! So to be abolished.

The origin and development of BaguwenThe drawbacks of the eight-strand text itselfLook at Baguwen rationallyAlthough the disadvantages of Baguwen under the Qing Dynasty system are becoming more and more obvious, objectively speaking, the existence of Baguwen has also inherited part of Chinese culture. Even though the Bagu text has gradually changed its taste, and even some ideological values have been buried, there are many good articles in the Bagu Wen that have been recorded in history, and we will only find the disadvantages when we look back on the past today, but we cannot deny it.

However, as the most important style of the imperial examination in the Ming and Qing dynasties, although the Bagu Wen was deeply criticized in the Ming and Qing dynasties, it has not been abolished and replaced, which shows that the Bagu Scholar also has its existence value and positive significance in the historical background at that time.

In order to strengthen the rule of the rulers of the Ming and Qing dynasties, even though the Baguwen was a poison to people's thoughts, it was not abolished by those in power.

Because the Eight Shares of Scholars were required by the emperor, such a method of imperial examination could limit people's minds and not allow scholars to have other ideas.

Baguwen was very harmful to the Ming and Qing dynasties, not only imprisoning people's thoughts, but also causing people to be short-sighted and lose their ability to think actively.

It stifles creativity, is not conducive to the development of education, and cultivates talented people who do not pay attention to practical knowledge, which is not conducive to the selection and appointment of talents. This has seriously hindered the development and progress of China's ideology, culture, science and technology.

Baguwen restricted the thinking of the Ming and Qing dynasties, so that the people focused on reading the Bagu scriptures, resulting in the gradual decay and backwardness of thought, and the implementation of the Baguwen also greatly reduced China's achievements in science and technology, so that China's science and technology gradually fell behind in the world competition.

The harm of the Baguwen to the Ming and Qing dynasties is to corrupt the rule of officials, imprison thoughts, block the development of science, and no longer care about society and people's livelihood.

But it can't be said that this thing is all harmful, after all, the Baguwen itself is actually fine, and there is nothing wrong with the Four Books and Five Classics themselves, but there are errors in the way and system of the examination.

After thousands of years of evolution, it cannot follow the footsteps of industrialization, but has become an obstacle.

It may be because the requirements of the eight-strand text are very strict, it must meet the overall structural requirements, the test essay is written at the top, and the eight-strand text requires that the test paper must be neat and tidy, without the slightest flaw, it must be written fairly, not scribbled, for the Ming and Qing dynasties, most of them are free and easy people, and the handwriting is relatively sloppy, but it is very extensive in the modern classroom.

Because Baguwen is not allowed to play freely. This fixed content, rigid form. Bound to the people's thoughts and the content of their expressions.

Content to form severely constrains candidates. Let the test taker not pay attention to reality, but only know to bury his head in hard study.

Because the eight-strand text is too rigid and single. All candidates who participated in the imperial examination were rote memorization and had a very narrow range of knowledge.