I want to buy the body of the Canon 450D, but I don t know what lens to add, and the budget is only

450D set is a very good entry model, want to learn photography and have a limited budget to buy this configuration is very suitable, (if your budget is about 7000, my recommended configuration is 450D body + Sigma 18-200 anti-shake head + EF 50mm F II, this set of configuration is characterized by a complete focal length, which can meet the shooting and composition of various subjects when you are learning, and has a large aperture fixed focus portrait head, you can practice portrait shooting) Beginners generally don't care too much about imaging, because the technology improves the shooting** It's good to be natural, and the pullover is still a work if it's used well. In addition, at least more than half of the people who say that the pullover is not good on the Internet are the same clouds, and those who really start the photography road from the pullover will say that the beginner pullover is very suitable, so this budget and purpose 450D set is very suitable, because this budget is really no more suitable than the pullover, if you spend more than 600 with an EF 50mm F II is also a good match.

The total budget is only 5000, or the set of machines, economical; Either buy the body and add a cheap lens, for example, only 600 pieces, if it is equipped with a cheap zoom head, it is better to use a sleeve.

In terms of physical parameters, the sleeve is indeed inferior to some high-end lenses, but if used correctly, the sleeve can also shoot well, at least, at medium apertures.

Professional photography refers to professional results, not necessarily professional equipment. If you use professional equipment to shoot an amateur effect, it will make people laugh off their big teeth.

If the lens is budgeted for 5000 alone, then there are many options; For general zoom lenses, the zoom magnification is 3-4 times, and the effect is okay, but if the magnification is too high, the optical performance will be very poor, and everyone on this earth knows it.

5000 yuan?

Pullover! Besides, you don't have a choice.

No. Well, I don't have that.

It is a good choice to put the head in the sleeve, and then change the bull head after practice. If you don't like the pullover, you can match it with a 17-85, which is also a more valuable head in Canon, but the budget will definitely be more or less excessive.

50 600 more plus a set of machines can be used Don't be so troublesome Fixed focus zoom zoom is all there.

**Not much, at most about 100 yuan

There is no other option than the set.

1. Xiaoxiaobai and 24-105 are the two lenses in the so-called Canon small ternary.

Since some people say that the small ternary is complete, of course, these two lenses can coexist.

Small ternary: 17-40 F4L, 24-105 F4L, 70-200 F4L

The 105 lens is the hood of the invincible rabbit, and it is a red circle, and the imaging will not be bad. It is different from Xiaoxiaobai and is not much comparable. Saying that 24-105 online reviews are average, this one is a bit sweaty.

If this is still ordinary, the shots below 24-105 are not in the eyes of these people.

The 105 lens is used on the 450d, with a maximum wide-angle equivalent of 38 mm. No more wide angles. It depends on your mind or you want to connect the focal length with the 18-55 socket. There's no need for that.

4. I recommend the 15-85 lens for APS-C format machine. Then add a small white as a portrait for telephoto use. 18-55 sets will be eliminated.

If you're going to get full width in the future, don't go 15-85, go straight to 24-105.

These two lenses are actually not repeated,But the imaging of xxb and xxbis is far behind,Not necessarily better than 24-105,If you plan to have a lens or 24-105 better,If the budget can,It is recommended to configure two lenses,It must be much better than the effect of one lens,The so-called penny price is worth a penny,It is still recommended to consider xxbis,This ** difference is more than oneIS,Sharpness,Color,There is a great improvement,The ages are far apart。

The focal length coefficient multiplied by the 450d of the 24-105 is not as practical as the focal length, and besides, you are only short of medium telephoto, and the image quality of the 24-105 is far from catching up with Xiaoxiaobai's.

24-105 and Xiaoxiaobai I have, from the actual use of the 24-105 focal length you said is more practical, you can't accept the love of Xiaoxiaobai**, I don't recommend it, Xiaoxiaobai focal length is relatively long, unless you take a big head, otherwise it is far away from the child, which is not conducive to communication. I have 6 lenses myself, and 80% of the time I go out is 24-105

Look at the needs of the landlord, recommend Canon 18-135, wide range of application, landscape and portrait, high picture definition Family travel is more convenient, the focal range is wide, the landlord can go to the official website to see.

C with 24-105 What level of performance art does this have to be?

There is a small spittoon indoors.

If you are afraid of burning money, it will be 55-250

Like a mirror to the end of the world, 18-135

The best hang-up for C frame is 15-85

No matter how you calculate, don't buy that F4 pseudo-red circle for C frame.

C-frame and full-width are not the same thing, and the 24-105 without a large aperture is completely comparable to 15-85 in C-frame (a little larger than F4).

If you just want a red circle, don't choose 24105, which is for the full-width hang-up, and the resolution advantage of the red circle is not well reflected in the C frame.

15-85 is expensive because it is the most suitable for C-frame, both in terms of focal length and image quality.

It's a waste to buy a 24-105 for a non-full-frame camera.

If the current head continues to be retained, according to the principle of non-repetition of the focal length, Xiaoxiaobai If the dog head does not like to play, you can go to 24-105 or 17-40

The 24-105 is more affordable, and it is indeed very easy to use.

Buy an 18-200 one, you can basically take a photo

If you want to avoid repetition of focal lengths, then use Xiaoxiaobai.

Xiaoxiaobai, how can I say that the focal section is not repeated, and it will be the same if Erche really changes the machine in the future!

The following is almost the same, just make a statement, I choose Xiaoxiaobai.

Support the opinion of the master upstairs!!