Who is it that puts the army at the top of strategic theory?

Grandson. From "Sun Tzu's Art of War: Seeking Attack": "All the art of using soldiers, the whole country is the first, and the country is second; The whole army is the first, and the broken army is second; The whole brigade is the first, and the broken brigade is second; The whole pawn is the first, and the broken pawn is second; The whole army is the first, and the army is second.

Therefore, a hundred battles are won, and the good ones who are not good are also; A soldier who surrenders without a fight, and a good man who is good. ”

Annotation: Qu: bow down, surrender Bing: army, military power.

Translation: Sun Tzu said: The general principle of judging victory in a war is that it is best to surrender the enemy country to us intact, and it is slightly inferior to attack the enemy country and mutilate and damage it; It is best to make the enemy's army (12,500 people as an army) complete and surrendered, and it is slightly inferior to use force to defeat the enemy's army.

It is best to make the enemy's first brigade (500 men as a brigade) complete and surrender all the officers and men, and it is slightly inferior to defeat the enemy's brigade by force; It is the best policy to make the enemy's one pawn (100 people as one pawn) surrender all officers and soldiers, and it is one step worse to defeat one pawn and all the soldiers; It is the best strategy to make all the soldiers of the enemy (5 people in a team) surrender, and it is one level worse to defeat a team of soldiers.

Therefore, although it is clever, it is not the most clever; Before attacking the city, it is the most clever of the best to let the enemy's military capabilities (including command and combat capabilities) be seriously lacking and unable to resist at all.

The Soldier Who Surrenders Without a Fight is from Sun Wu, a famous military strategist and politician in the Spring and Autumn Period of China, "The Art of War: Seeking Attack"; The original intention was to incapacitate the enemy's army, so that the goal of one's own victory was achieved. Now it mostly refers to the ability to bring the enemy to its knees without the blades of the two armies.

Put the army that surrenders without a fight at the top of strategic theory. I think the representative figure in history is Zhuge Liang.

The Art of War in the Art of War.

It is pointed out that "the soldiers who surrender without a fight are also the good ones." Therefore, the army is attacked, the second is the enemy, the second is the army, and the city is attacked."

In the actual application of grinding and balancing, it can be divided into two categories and four levels. "Plotting" and "cutting relations" belong to the "no war" thinking; "Cutting down troops" and "besieging cities" belong to the thinking of "cautious warfare". First, "going to the army to fight and plotting" refers to relying on the comprehensive operation of strategic use, including political, economic, cultural, and foreign relations, and other means, and settling disputes in advance without waiting for the contradictions between the opposing sides to intensify.

Second, "secondary diplomatic relations" refers to mobilizing the forces of the country and the countries concerned when contradictions have already emerged, showing determination, creating overwhelming superiority or a balance of forces, supplemented by knowing the interests and disadvantages, and achieving strategic goals without resorting to force through compromises and compromises. Third, "secondary expedition" refers to the use of part of the military force.

Deal with the enemy outside of its political and economic center of gravity in order to minimize the damage of the war. Fourth, "attacking the city" refers to the last resort when the above three efforts are ineffective, that is, to attack the enemy's strategic points or even all of its territory. We must admit that in a military confrontation, it is not easy to achieve the outcome of a completely subjugated army without a fight, even if it is in a superior position and has the initiative.

The essence of Sun Tzu's strategic idea of "total victory" is to resolve conflicts and contradictions between regions, between countries, and between nations through diplomacy and other means, rather than using force. This idea emphasizes the important role of strategy and wisdom in warfare, and puts forward the idea of winning a war by the best means.

In a practical sense, the strategic idea of "surrendering the army without a fight" is still of important guiding significance for modern society. It advocates the peaceful settlement of disputes through diplomatic means, reduces the occurrence of war, and avoids the loss of human life and property. This kind of thinking has a positive effect on promoting peace and development in the world today, and can help people better understand and understand the nature of war, so that they can cherish and maintain peace even more.

In addition, the strategic idea of "surrendering the army without a fight" also contains the idea of putting people first, emphasizing the protection of the people's rights and interests and the safety of their lives in war. This thinking is consistent with modern international humanitarian law and international security principles, and is of great significance for the maintenance of international order and the development of human civilization.

In short, Sun Tzu's strategic thinking of "conquering the army without a fight" is of great historical value and practical significance, and it still plays a positive role in promoting the peace and development of today's society.

The essence of Sun Tzu's "total victory" strategic thinking of "starving Li and surrendering without a fight" is the highest state of war, that is, victory can be achieved without a single soldier, and it is also the best policy to achieve victory in war; Its practical significance is to resolve conflicts and contradictions between regions, between countries, and between nationalities through diplomacy and other means, rather than resorting to force.