Ask a question about tanks 30

1> The online name is already 99A2< 2> Russia's active or world active are T54, 55 series, T62 series, T64 series, T72 series, T80 series, T90 series, PT76 and even T34. , 3> seems to be in order to solve the problem that the track is not repaired well by bombing< 4> no. The multi-turret has <5> which is not a tank, it is an M113 armored car for anti-aircraft purposes.

After World War II, you can go to the German Leopard 3 tank, which is an experimental technology demonstration vehicle.

A tough iron warrior, a ruthless injury-resistant behemoth. <>

I want to roll my eyes at those who preach the uselessness of tanks, although there are anti-tank **, but tanks are still of great importance in terms of operations. Having seen the wars of the new century, such as the Kosovo and Afghanistan wars, people were amazed by the flexible tactical coordination and high-intensity combat capability of the Navy and Air Force, and everyone began to slowly change their thinking that air strikes were the turning point of victory or defeat, and thus began to question the combat capability of the army, and even came again and again - the so-called "tank uselessness" ...... appeared

But there is also an old saying: it is always the army that wins the battle. For wars such as conquering the territory and expanding the territory, can we expect the navy to land?

Or the Air Force dropping bombs? Blown into a mess? Only the army can rush into the corners and clear the enemy.

Think about it, in the Iraq war, it was slaughtered into salted fish by the US military in time, and in the end, didn't the United States still send its army all the way into Baghdad? Therefore, it is not that the army is not important, but that the combat effectiveness is stable and the finale debuts, and the position is still indestructible. As long as the war is still a war that human beings step on on land, and the form remains unchanged, then the tank will inevitably be useful, and its comprehensive effectiveness will also be among the best.

The birth of Wuzhi has actually promoted a lot of clamor for the uselessness of tanks, but to analyze a wave in detail, can the emergence of nuclear ** be said to be useless? Wu Zhi After all, no matter how good his performance is, he also flies with two wings, can he walk on the same two legs? At the end of the day, there is still a ...... reproductive isolationThis!

Not only can the tank be used as an attack**, it can always accompany the infantry in battle, and can be used as a cover and defense in times of crisis. Like in the game, there are warriors who output a wet nurse and a meat shield to resist damage. Then the tank undoubtedly plays the position of a thick flesh shield, directly eating all the damage on the battlefield.

Good guys, people suffer and suffer here, and in the end they are reprimanded, it's useless, you tell who listens to who is not wronged!

Type 59 Medium Tank (Chinese development code: WZ120, English: Type 59 Medium Tank [1], abbreviation:

Type 59 tank), the base trouser is a kind of medium fighting tank that China imitated and equipped in large quantities in the 50s of the 20th century with reference to the Soviet T-54A medium tank.

The tank weighed 36 tons [55] with a crew of 4 people, a maximum speed of 50 kilometers per hour, and a maximum range of 560 kilometers. The main ** has 1 100-mm rifled gun with a combat rate of fire of 7 rounds, 1 mm anti-aircraft machine gun and 2 mm machine guns, equipped with infrared night vision devices for night driving. The armor in the bow and sides of the hull was thick, the turret was streamlined, and it had good bullet resistance.

The tank has strong firepower, good armor protection and maneuverability, light weight, simple structure, reliable work, and easy use and maintenance.

Judging from the two ** photos you provided, it seems that Netan is a Chinese research and development of the Huaibu tank experimental vehicle, and a WZ111 heavy tank developed by China. But this tank did not enter service.