Excuse me, is the 550 or 500D set good? Or is it better to match the lens of the analogue? Because

Don't bother. The fuselage is EOS 500D, which is completely sufficient, and it is also affordable. If you don't care about the camera function, buying a 450D is a good choice, and photography is completely sufficient.

Photography is to look at **, not to catch up with the trend. I don't believe that the 550d will be better than my 350d.

Lenses, it is not recommended to pull over and 18-200. There is no one good or bad for this kind of lens, they are all of the same grade, and the imaging effect is almost the same. My suggestion is:

Don't consider the telephoto lens for now, and talk about it later when you have the conditions. First buy a standard change and a fixed focus, the standard change selection Tenglong 17-50, brand new about 3300 yuan, second-hand 2000 yuan. Canon EF 50 for fixed focus, about 700 yuan for the new one, the cost performance is very good, and the imaging effect is quite good (if you feel that you are out of budget, then you can only change the standard to 18-55 set head).

The Canon 550D and 500D have good 18-55is imaging, and the introduction to photography is good. The imaging is definitely better than the Tamron 18-200.

It is recommended that the landlord first use 18-55is to practice his hands well, find more photography tutorials, and learn the basics of photography. Don't think about other lenses yet, it's not that you can shoot good ** with good equipment. For beginner level, 500d or 550d plus 18-55is is sufficient.

Photography is for shooting, not comparing the equipment in hand, which is what the outbreaks do. This should be understood from the very beginning.

Attach two 18-55 shots to the landlord.

The original factory is better than the auxiliary factory. 18-55 This head shoots the scenery with a small aperture, which will be sharper.

The auxiliary factory is not bad, the landlord can buy a set of machines to play with first, and in the future, several auxiliary factories will be cheaper than the original factory with fixed coke and large aperture.

Canon's 18-55 kit is the same as Nikon's, which is very average.

1. Look at how much silver you have prepared, a little more silver, just buy 550d.

2. It is not recommended to go to 18-200 at the beginning, unless you are going to use this lens in the future. Generally, playing SLR is very addictive, and most of them will try their best to add new lenses after buying a set.

18-55 is suitable for beginners, and when you get more and more hands-on, you can look at your own interests, whether it is a portrait or a landscape or a bird or a macro of flowers and plants. Different options also have different lenses to work with.

It is recommended that 550d+18-55 be learned first. 500d is still worse than 550d.

500D+ Canon Genuine Lens 18-135

This is the pullover for the Canon 50D. However, because the imaging quality is very good, the focal length is very practical, you can shoot landscape portraits, and the workmanship is very good, so it has become the first choice of many people. At the same time, because when shooting landscapes, we generally shrink the aperture to increase the depth of field, that is, to make the whole scene clear rather than blurring the effect.

So this head, although it can only reach the aperture at the 18mm focal length, is sufficient, because it is generally used to shoot landscapes, and this head has good imagery. Even a constant-aperture wide-angle lens of several thousand yuan does not seem so necessary at this time. You must know that the savings are thousands of yuan!

It makes sense that many people like him, and his "dog head" is actually very "bullish". It is an affordable, inexpensive wide-angle lens. It is indeed a good head worth buying.

First, if you have money, you can buy 550d (but ** are close to 50d...) Not cost-effective), to cost 500d

Second, the imaging of 18-200 is not better than that of 18-55, that is, the focal length is longer, or it is not as good as 18-55 except for the focal length

Third, the best choice, 500D set.

Canon is very good, the photographic effect is very good, I recently want to buy a camera, and I heard that Canon ranked first in consumer durables camera customer satisfaction in the 2010 China Customer Satisfaction Survey, of course, there is no need to hesitate, buy a camera is not a rest assured, choose Canon, hehe

550D bar You can buy a wide-angle lens + a telephoto lens.

The best way to get started is to buy the 450D Pentax KX

You have to choose between 550D and 500D, 500D is better and cheaper 1000 Oceans 550D is actually an entry machine that can't go up or down, and now Nikon D7000 will come out soon 550D may have to adjust the price I just bought 550D and regretted it.

You can use 18-55 for the entry of the lens, and when your technology is a little better, you can buy the 18-200 At that time, it is estimated that the entry camera has reached the time when the yang life is approaching, and it is better to change to a 5D 5D-II with a good lens

If it is a general travel, family photography, and videography application, the 550D set is basically enough. (Refer to **5300 or so).

mm f, is a very good head for shooting portraits and landscapes, but novices may not use it well, it is recommended to play with the head first and then consider the head, then you will have your own opinions, no need to know to ask others.

2. There is still a set of cleaning kits, but you don't have to choose Japanese products;

3. There must be a spare battery. If you go out to travel and find beautiful scenery, and the battery runs out at this time, isn't it very disappointing? Add an extra battery, Pinsheng's, it only costs about 50 60 yuan, which is a must;

4. Buy a tripod and take a group photo when the family travels.

In fact, the reason for recommending 550D is very simple: 550D uses high-end non-full-width 7D chips 500D shell (just like the D700 D3 chip used in the D300 shell, known as D700 is called small D3), in comparison, 550D performance rate is superior, 550D is called 7D smaller

Tripods, UV lenses, and lens hoods are always indispensable, and as for accessories such as shutter releases, polarizers, filters, and flashes, wait until you see what kind of photographic subject you like in the future. Photography is a lot of money, but it's also a lot of fun.

In addition, the lenses of the 550D set are divided into different types.

According to your budget, the imaging of 18-55 is good, 18-135 is also more practical, the imaging is good, and the cost performance is high in 3 sleeves, and 18-200 belongs to one lens to go around the world, and the imaging is average but very practical.

If it were me, I would choose (18-200 + 50 18-200 One lens to go all over the world, suitable for newcomers to cope with various occasions, with 50 fixed focal points to deal with indoor and outdoor portraits in low light, because the aperture is large, it can be reached, and the bokeh is also very beautiful.

Of course, the newer the model, the better.

Except for the 60d machine that failed.

The 550D is an upgraded version of the 500 set.

This level of Canon machine is an entry-level half-width machine without much difference, once had a 500d set, a friend recently bought a 550d set, after comparison, found that the 550d set of machines in addition to adding some fancy functions to the software, it is not much help for taking pictures, 500d sets are more practical, after all** cheaper than 550d.

It is recommended to buy a 500d set (18-55), I also bought one, it feels good, it is enough for your needs, **It should be about 4500 yuan. Also buy some accessories (maybe some as a gift): tripods, UV mirrors, cleaning kits, camera bags, memory cards, etc.

500D is outdated, Canon has a new 550D, 550D as a replacement for 500D, the performance is comprehensively improved, and the overall performance can also be described as a comprehensive surpass, I believe many potential buyers understand this. Based on the principle of buying new digital products and not buying old ones, there is basically nothing wrong with choosing 550d, and it is very cost-effective Hehe, the landlord makes his own decisions

Regardless of **, of course the newer the model, the better.

Your needs dictate that 500d is better.

If you don't like PS, it's better to use Pentax KX or KR if you go out directly, it's cheap, first-class workmanship, and the direct film effect is better than Canon, and the set lens is stronger than Nikon, and there are a lot of interesting functions, and it's easy to control.

Of course, the 550D is better, because the 550D is the replacement of the 500D. Both pixels and other functions have been upgraded.

If you have the ability to buy another head, although it is said that the pullover shoots out the ps and does not see pp to be unacceptable, but the travel, the pullover is too difficult to meet, I am recently optimistic about the price of 18-200, more than 3000, I have tried it and feel that it can meet my basic requirements, and I usually don't need to change my head, otherwise I think it is too troublesome, I am also usually patted and traveled.

It's okay to shoot a wedding or something, but if you shoot a portrait alone, you can add more fixed focus.

To meet your needs, buy a pullover with 18-135, and your photography level will gradually improve in the future, and you will be considering adding heads.

I think it's almost the same to buy 18-135 for a friend's money to buy in a few days, and the ** is a full set down to more than 7,000 points.

550d with 18 135 pullover can basically meet the needs of the landlord, the best choice to go the world, if it is a tour, it will be very troublesome with other heads, either can not meet or is inconvenient to carry, ** a set of 7000 But it is said that now 18 135 is not much, start fast

What is the budget for additional lenses?

Digital buy new not buy old 550D+18 55 sets 5050 with tickets November Beijing price may be cheaper now.

LZ refers to the wide-angle end, which is correct, but the wide-angle end of 18mm is larger than the wide-angle end of 70mm, that is, the scene that can be ingested is larger.

Sigma does not use red circles to determine whether the lenses are good or bad, and the Sigma lenses with gold rings belong to the top lenses.

The idea of the landlord buying a single camera with a lens is right, support!

I'm also from the telephoto party directly to the SLR party.,If the landlord doesn't want to invest too much in the lens now, you can consider Sigma、Tenron's full focal length -250。。。 The second-hand lens is about 1400, and the Canon EFS series lens 18-135 is also a good object to consider.

Why is it recommended for landlords to buy full focal lengths?

1. The full focal length can meet most of the shooting in daily life, (in fact, 18-200 is equivalent to 1x-12x of the zoom factor of a digital camera).

2. If you want to buy a prime lens, you can buy a "small spittoon" 50mm, about 500 yuan, which is relatively cost-effective.

If you really risk playing SLR with three generations, then you must contact the prime lens, 18-135 or something is just a toy before the prime focus, zoom or something, it's just convenient, the image quality and the prime can not be compared, especially Canon's high pixel density CMOS, which highlights the gap between the fixed focus and the zoom.

As a photography enthusiast, how can you not have a header? Then you can start with the cheapest 50, and the image quality is better than 18-135, if you need to zoom for daily use, an 18-135 is enough, and you are likely to continue to play full-frame with fever in the future, then 18-135 is useless, so there is no need to buy 15-85 and the like** zoom head (except for long zoom).

Canon's fixed focus, the red circle is all good, and the one without the red circle is not good, this is the final conclusion, a red circle, as little as six or seven thousand, as much as forty or fifty thousand, if you don't play these, you can't play Canon's top picture quality.

Finally, I would like to remind you that drug abuse ruins your life, and photography is poor for three generations.

So why not Nikon go ahead.

At the entry level, Nikon is the most realistic, and the low-end is also decent.

The best cost-effective is the D90+18-105VR head, Canon's grade is really not flattering, especially this head shrinkage is too serious.

The 500D set does not have the 18-135 lens, only the 18-200. **It's about the same as 550D18-135, all around 6800, but there are not many large sets of 500D on the market.

If you really don't want a dog's head, then the 550D body is +17-40, almost 9000+. If you don't consider changing the fuselage 15-85, you can also consider it, in fact, the most cost-effective person thinks that it is still the 550D18-135 set.

18-135mm 18 is its wide-angle end, 135 is its telephoto end, and the conversion factor that Canon's APS-C format has to be multiplied, and the actual focal length is equivalent to 28-216.

Let's go to my space and do some literacy, I won't say more.

Personally, I think. The 500D is not necessarily a good place to start. Consider Nikon's D90....

This is a miracle machine. Other than that. Sony's A580, which has only been around for too long, is not bad.

If it's a little richer. You can think about it. 50d..

Forehead. It seems to have been discontinued.