The mode of operation of future conventional wars, the forms of future wars

I think this is a topic that everyone wants to know about what kind of pattern it will appear in future battles. Here we might as well imagine how no one knows.

I'm just talking about my personal opinion, the shortcomings, please give more advice to my comrades-in-arms, my assumption is this: the future is still to take special operations as the main model, first use *** to parachute special forces into the enemy's rear, destroy the enemy's main military facilities, paralyze the enemy's command system, and if possible, carry out decapitation operations to speed up the process of ending the war. Then, with powerful firepower, it will carry out a devastating blow to the enemy's forward troops, and then penetrate into the enemy's depth with a powerful maneuverability, and at the same time parachute into the enemy's rear airborne troops to cooperate with the operation of the main battlefield, cut off the connection between the enemy's various arms, and completely crush the enemy's troops.

In the Iraq War, the U.S. military made the Iraqi army a mess in this way, and was finally defeated by the U.S. military.

The situation on the battlefield is changing rapidly, so its war mode will change accordingly, and it is necessary to adapt to the new war mode in the exercise as soon as possible, and the exercise is not a show, otherwise in the real battle, there will be only one consequence. The U.S. military is strong precisely because it is constantly growing in battle. Since our country is in a period of peace, it is impossible to have a war in the short term, so it is necessary to temper the troops during the exercises.

The iron-blooded soul has no regrets for the country!

Personally, I think that special operations are only auxiliary, but they cannot be used as the main means, because the success rate of special forces behind enemy lines is already very low.

Modern warfare is characterized by precision and informationization, and these will not change, so if a war is launched, if you have air supremacy or conditions permit, you can carry out strategic bombing of important targets of the enemy and the enemy, such as the decapitation operation of the United States, or if possible, use ground-based missiles to carry out long-range strikes.

In future wars, I think that the rate of contact warfare will be reduced, and there will be more cases such as infiltration, reconnaissance, and then long-range strikes.

In addition, the number of people on the battlefield should be smaller, and from the perspective of the development of military history, the number of participants in each war is getting smaller and smaller, and large-scale engagements are already rare.

Personal opinion, because I am not a cadet, the analysis is limited, please see.

Personal opinion: Artificial intelligence controls machines to automatically detect and collect energy and raw materials. Fully automated production of missiles and anti-missiles.

There is artificial intelligence that designs tactical targets and strike scenarios based on the set strategic intent. Finally, there is a fully automatic execution scheme of computer AI. Until the goal is achieved or other end conditions are met.

It must be one-sided, the sea of people, and the sea of machines are all useless. Robots, prosthetic people, exoskeletons, new concepts ** will start a war in a hurry to put them on the battlefield, and the attacking side will have almost no personnel **, and the defenders may be genocided.

First, the battle for information.

2. Network-centric warfare.

3. Electronic warfare.

Fourth, computer warfare.

1. Information warfare: That is, operations aimed at seizing control of battlefield information within a certain range of time and space by using a variety of means. In informationized warfare, timely grasping the right to control information has become the premise of combat operations and is a multiplier of combat effectiveness; in order to control the initiative on the battlefield and realize freedom of action in combat, it is first necessary to seize the right to control information on the battlefield.

2. Network-centric warfare: Network-centric warfare uses communication systems and computer systems to form an information grid network to organically and integrally link various reconnaissance and detection systems, command and control systems, and strike systems that are geographically dispersed on land, sea, air, and space, so as to form a rapid-response, unified, and highly efficient combat system.

By using information superiority to achieve the first enemy's action, combat operations are close to real-time, and the effectiveness of joint operations has been greatly enhanced.

3. Electronic warfare: Electronic warfare refers to the measures and actions taken to weaken and destroy the effectiveness of the enemy's electronic equipment and to protect the normal performance of the enemy's electronic equipment.

4. Computer warfare: Computers are the foundation and platform of information systems and have a core position in information systems. Computer warfare refers to the form of warfare carried out by using computers with information systems as the main objective.

The U.S. Army's National Training Center in Fort Avon, California, USA, conducted a battle that simulated a futuristic battlefield.

In a dusty uninhabited canyon, a radio network connects a highly computerized tank brigade, allowing all crew members on the tank to see the same computerized map of the battlefield. The attacking tank was commanded by a multi-purpose wheeled vehicle, the "Operational Command Lu Hao Car", which was filled with electronics and computers. Its main task is to keep track of the strength and condition of the lead enemy, and also to coordinate friendly forces in order to report to the commander on changes in the battlefield in a timely manner.

Each vehicle is equipped with a laptop computer, which is linked together by a network of computers, and the combatant selects the data from the computer screen or from a larger monitor installed in the vehicle. Intelligence from satellites, drones, reconnaissance planes and other means was gathered at a command post in the rear. All of this data is then converted into an identification image and subjected to continuous monitoring on a row of computer screens.

Many soldiers carried small personal computers on their backs. Their uniforms are equipped with various sensors, a satellite computer for communication embedded in the helmet and sensors, and an ultra-small microprocessor embedded in the **. Soldiers can report their location with a GPS receiver.

Each vehicle is also equipped with a GPS receiver and transmitter, which enables the satellite to track vehicles at the 4-square-kilometre exercise range.

According to military experts, the main ones in warfare in the 21st century are soldiers and computers.

The US Army is ready to digitize all ground forces by 2010.