CPU Problem Problem 25, CPU Problem Issue

It feels pretty much the same as the Intel Core 2 Duo E4400

Product name: AMD AM2 Athlon, 64 X2, 5200+(90nm), Intel Core 2 Duo E4400

Cancel the comparison Remove Product Remove a product.

Main parameters: Model AM2 Athlon: 64 X2, 5200+(90nm), Core 2, Duo E4400

Applicable Type: Desktop, Desktop.

Interface type: Socket AM2 LGA 775

Core type windsor conroe

Production process. Core voltage.

Main frequency: External frequency: 200MHz, external frequency: 200MHz

Multiplier 13x 10x

L1 L1 2*128k L1 128K

L2 2*1024k L2 2048k

FSB frequency 1000MHz 800MHz

HyperTransport Bus Technology HyperTransport bus technology is supported.

Functional parameters of hyper-threading technology are not supported.

64-bit processors Yes Yes.

Number of cores: Dual-core, dual-core.

TDP Technology Support Yes.

Virtualization is not supported.

Other parameters Packaging Boxed Boxed.

Warranty time, method Three-year warranty.

Other Performance: TDP Power Consumption 89W TDP65W, Instruction Set: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SUP-SSE3, EM64T, XD-BIT

The Core 2 E6300 is about the same but the Core is much better than AMD in terms of floating-point arithmetic.

The performance is not the same, but the architecture is different.

There is no equivalent to anything, there is not much bias, if you have money, you will deduct meat, and if you don't have money, AMD performance is also good.

There's no need to just watch ads or listen to people.

1. You don't know all your questions. Dual-core without P4 architecture, negligible.

The speed does not depend on the main frequency, and the main frequency can only reflect the speed of the homogeneous CPU. Different architectures cannot be compared together. It's like 100 dollars in the U.S. dollar and 100 yuan in the Japanese dollar have different purchasing power.

The speed can be measured by third-party testing software such as Super Pi as a reference for processing speed.

104W 46 seconds, E2140 104W 35 seconds.

Based on this parameter, the e2140 is 30% faster than the single-core speed by default. Counting the dual-core bonus, that's 160% faster

2.Hyper-threading is the virtualization of the CPU into 2, which can be seen as 2 50%. Acceleration when dealing with 2 tasks less than 50%. However, in the face of the CPU load task of video suppression, there is no acceleration effect.

3.For example, the i3 350 is now more popular. This CPU is dual-core hyper-threaded emulating 4 cores.

Let's assume that the default dual-core hyperthreading speed is 100

With hyper-threading turned off, the dual-core speed is still 100

Turn on hyper-threading, turn off a core (become single-core hyper-threading to simulate dual-core) and the speed is 50

This depends on your software support does not point out the dual-core, if it is not supported, it is a single-core fast, but this is completely based on the assumption of the landlord to answer, in fact, the landlord said "in addition to the exact same u" does not exist in reality! Let's make this clear! The single core is definitely P4, the Core has never produced a single core, and the dual core is definitely the Core.