Make it give 50 points thank you

To put it simply, there are two aspects to the problem.

First, theoretically speaking, there is no system without defects in the world, and any system, including the market economic system, has its limitations and defects.

Second, the advantage of the market economy lies in the fact that it can fully mobilize the enthusiasm of individuals and create social wealth through the accumulation of individuals. But its flaws are:

Personal interests are not always consistent with social interests, and when personal interests are contrary to social interests, the stronger the individual's enthusiasm, the greater the harm to society.

Some people even say that "China's export products are at the expense of the welfare of Chinese and subsidize foreigners."

This view is correct, but it is generally inappropriate.

Correctness refers to the fact that what he said is indeed a fact: "China's export products are at the expense of the welfare of Chinese and subsidize foreigners" is essentially correct. However, it must be pointed out that this fact has its inevitability and is reasonable.

At the beginning of reform and opening up, China lacked capital, technology, and low quality and living standards of its people, so in order to obtain the necessary capital and technology to improve the production efficiency and living standards of the people, it was necessary to come up with something useful to foreigners in exchange. In this exchange process, foreigners have obtained benefits, Chinese have obtained capital, technology and development, and have improved their own welfare in the process of development; in this process, China is not a victim, but a party that has gained through the exchange at a certain cost.

Benefit-cost is our real gain, as for whether this gain is negative, then the benevolent and the wise will see the wisdom. Personally, I think it's positive.

1.There is no problem with the market economy system, and there is some lack of supervision, but I don't think it's an important reason.

The main reason is the greed of human nature, which is beyond the reach of regulation. For example, the South China Sea ** crisis in the United Kingdom, which has existed for a long time (as it seems to be called), through this crisis, human beings can learn a lot in the short term, and can learn some in the medium term, but they can't learn anything in the long term, because greed will not change, and the crisis will occur in another form, 2I agree with the argument that China subsidizes foreign countries, but there is no way around it.

What does China, which is poor and white, rely on to attract investment? In order for capital to accumulate primitively, it must sacrifice something.

This topic says that you want to talk about your views, but in fact, before you talk about it, he has already indicated what kind of views he wants you to talk about, which has a certain political color.

Whether it is from the perspective of topic orientation or from the actual situation, I basically agree with the statement of "lonely investor - director level eight".

I can't see it clearly. You type here!