Is the United States a bureaucratic society? The secret of the United States breaking the official s

The United States is not an official position.

Society is a people-oriented society. The United States is the most restrictive legislature.

The powers of the executive and the judiciary should be checked against each other in order to prevent the organs of power, either alone or in combination, from depriving citizens of their legitimate rights in the name of the State.

Is the United States a bureaucratic society? The United States is an out-and-out official-based society, and they should say that the person who has that economic foundation can be elected to that ****.

The United States is not, they belong to a capitalist society, and the gap between them and the official standard is a bit big.

After holding power for a long time, there is naturally the phenomenon of official standard. In capitalist countries, capital is suppressing, and in order to prevent it from getting out of control, it often changes blood, so it shows less official-oriented phenomena.

He doesn't say that you are in charge of the ontological society, he belongs to the high-end version of socialism.

The United States should not be a bureaucratic society.

(1) The ideological basis of the people's power.

The political concept of "putting power in the people" established by the United States since the founding of the People's Republic of China is the ideological basis for eliminating the official standard.

2) The institutional basis for the combination of election and term of office.

The United States can be described as an "electoral country" in the true sense of the word. In addition to the quadrennial and biennial congressional elections, there are nearly 2,000 local elections every year, electing governors, state senators and representatives, city halls, and even chairmen of school district boards. At the federal level, there are generally term limits, and each new appointee appoints more than 2,000 assistant secretaries of state, of which more than 600 require congressional approval, which also eliminates corruption.

3) Strong supervision inside and outside the system.

Strong supervision within and outside the government system is also the main means for the United States to eliminate corruption and degeneration caused by the official position.

The consciousness of democracy, the consciousness of public servants and the supervision of citizens are pervasive;

The most important thing is the checks and balances of power, the separation of powers among the legislative, judicial, and executive powers, and mutual supervision.

Writer Yang Daxia believes that the history of the "official standard" is essentially a history of violent conflicts, constant revolution and destruction.

The free market is the essential feature of capitalist society, and because of the unorganized and planned nature of its economic activities, it is completely mediated by the market, so its economic crisis and inflation are inevitable.

In market economic activities, it is capital that has the final say.

That's why it's called capitalism.

1.But the market has some flaws that need to be regulated. The market is not a perfect mechanism.

2.The liberal market you are talking about should be called the a** market.

3.Regarding this market, whether capital should be allowed to run freely or whether it needs to be regulated is actually a controversy between two factions.

Thailand, India, Singapore and other Western political countries.

"Official standard" is a kind of value that is based on officials, takes officials as noble, and respects officials as the main content.

1. "Official standard" is not a strictly scientific concept but a popular saying, which first appeared in the 80s of the 20th century. Law originated from a term used in economics – the gold standard.

2. The "official standard" corresponds to or converts all job titles, individual identities, and status into a certain level of official rank, and determines the dignity and inferiority and high and low by the official rank, rather than measuring the value of the individual by real talent and actual contribution to the society, forming a social psychology of "everything is inferior, only to be an official".

The official standard is the reverse model of a society governed by the rule of law.

For example, a director.

Normal decision-making management should be done by the internal management body, and you can't just take it because you're the director. Too much power.

The work of ** should be redefined:

An organization should be supreme by an internal management council, not **.

**Not authorized to appoint members of the Board of Management, and to make specific appointments. The members of the Board of Management are voted on by all the staff of the internal organization.

** Responsible for convening the council and putting forward constructive suggestions, and the specific deliberation should be the center of power of the management committee.

What should be done.

Proposals to improve the internal management structure.

Proposals to improve the business structure.

Proposals that advocate for business direction.

Supervise and expose internal or external management issues and social issues.

Accidents and emergencies only have temporary lenient authority, and they must be reviewed by the management committee afterwards. (The essence is that the proposed function is the essential scope of work).

The type of thing that cannot be dominated by the group, ** as a spokesperson, a supervisor, not an infinite power.

In any case, it is necessary to abolish the official standard, and establish the leading position of the internal management committee, the status of the internal management system, and the institutional status of the external management legal system. It is necessary to clarify the work responsibilities of the first person and reduce the power, rather than positioning it as a person with unlimited power.

The existing system remains unchanged.

There is no fundamental change in this thinking.

A young man who has been baptized by Western ideology in the United States and has a strong sense of criticism only needs to enter the system.

I will also pick up the book again and study this idea in depth from the origin-development --- direction.