Ask an expert to help you choose a telephoto camera! Canon A630, Nikon S10, Fujifilm S5700 S7000 S58

Among these machines, A630The CCD is the largest, and the imaging quality is the best, but the A630The barrel distortion at the wide-angle end is quite serious, and the color reproduction is not as good as Fuji's machine, Fujifilm S5800 is recommended

Of course, it has to be A630, and its picture quality is definitely not blown out.

The most important thing is that the image quality of the A630 is the best among these few.

Secondly, the manual functions of the A630 are the most comprehensive.

The macro effect is similar, and at long range (telephoto), it is rarely used at home, and the image quality of cameras with telephoto is not good (except for the Fujifilm S100FS).

Of course, the choice of camera is in the CN two, and the others are slightly inferior to the low-end of Canon and Nikon. But when it comes to the high-end, it's completely different things, Canon's high-end zoom is cheaper than Nikon, and there are cost-effective F4 small ternary to choose from, Nikon's big ternary is more than 1W is very expensive. Then the highest-end Canon has a red-circled prime to choose from, which is unmatched by other manufacturers.

Canon's color reproduction is true, the contrast is slightly smaller, and it is overly smooth, which is the first choice for portraits; Nikon's JPG is sharp and contrasting, and it is suitable for the landscape. Personally, I think that depending on the budget and interest, if you are ready to continue burning in the future, then the canon system is more suitable.

Canon's good Ixus 300hs I bought yesterday

The tz3 is not as good as those two. Also cheap.

Panasonic has already released the TZ5, and the Panasonic FZ18 is also of the same type as the above.

Personal preference for sx110 pixels high.

It's not wide, though, but the Canon's noise suppression is good.

Panasonic lithium battery has a wide angle.

1-Launched in August 2007, it is positioned as an advanced portable digital model, mainly for high-quality users who pursue image quality and portability at the same time.

The Powershot SX100 IS features a 10x optical zoom lens with IS optical image stabilization, making it easy for users to use whether they are shooting indoors or in low-light environments such as dusk and dawn. Widescreen stills in 16:9 format can be shot.

2- It should be said that the H3 is still relatively mainstream in terms of configuration, with 8.08 million effective pixels and a Carl Zeiss lens with 10x optical zoom capability. From the positioning of low-end portable and large zoom, there is no wide-angle shooting function equipped with some brand models, and from the configuration of the image sensor and lens, the H3 does not have much to say. However, this model left us with a completely different impression, so let's take a look at what the H3 is really appealing about. 3-

2,000 ends = 20 million pixels? Or 20 million RMB?

It is recommended to buy the Canon SX100 IS, I also compared it for a long time when I bought it during the Spring Festival, and finally chose the Canon SX100 IS, the 10x optical zoom is very good!

I don't know what the main purpose of the landlord buys a camera, if it is purely for home use, Panasonic TZ3 should be suitable for a current ** is also very cheap, very cost-effective, there are 28mm Leica wide-angle lens, 10x optical zoom lens, inch TFT LCD uses a metal body, and the weight is only 232 grams, which is definitely light in a telephoto machine. The MEGA optical image stabilization system using Panasonic's own patented technology is ideal, and last year it was selected as the best telephoto digital camera in 2007 by TIPA in Europe, and this halo fell on Panasonic TZ3. It's not easy, because the Technical Image Press Association (TIPA) is a non-profit organization of photography and video output magazines from all over Europe.

The winners of TIPA are voted on each year by the most outstanding photography and video magazines representing all of Europe. These high-profile Photography & Imaging Product of the Year awards have a high impact on the industry. Their reviews are very authoritative, so I don't need to say anything more.

Let the landlord think about it himself, right?

Kodak Z1012 is also good, if it is equipped with a large-capacity memory card, it can be used as a camera or as a camera.

Samsung is South Korean.

Loose stalking, under the Sony Kai Jane Fuji is Japanese.

Lenovo Kodak is a lead country!

The telephoto camera is a little larger than the general DC, but unlike the DSLR, which can change the lens, the optical zoom ratio is larger

Appearance features: There is a prominent lens part, which is larger than the ordinary DC lens, and the lens is integrated with the body.

Model series: Fujifilm S series, Sony H series, Nikon P series, Panasonic FZ series, Canon SX series.

Canon Sx120 Sx210 Sx20 Sx200Nikon P100 L110 S6000 S8000 Kodak I don't know.

Sony's H55 HX5C

Fujifilm F75 F85 S2600 S1770 HS11 But among the Fujifilm parameters there is moisture. His F75 10x light change is as far as Nikon's S630 7x light change. I tested.

Canon SX210 14x optical zoom SX120 10x optical zoom SX20 20x optical zoom.

Nikon L110 15x optical zoom, P100 24x optical zoom, S6000, 7x S8000, 10x.

Sony H55 HX5C 10x optical zoom Panasonic ZS7 FZ35

Fujifilm F75 F85 10x optical zoom 1770 15x 2600 18x S205 14x HS11 30x.

BenQ is the first from the bottom, and this should be indisputable.

Casio and Samsung are more or less stained with Pentax's light, otherwise it is the level of BenQ.

Sony, in fact, it's not bad, although the industry is making game consoles and electrical appliances, but it has merged Kemei, made a card machine for many years, and has the ability to produce its own CCD CMOS, and now the level is also on the middle.

Ricoh, the film era was famous, and now it is in decline.

Fuji is now playing card machine and large format.,Someone actually said that Fuji is bad.,Speechless.,Let's first understand what a large format is.。

Olympus and Panasonic currently have a cooperative relationship, and the M43 system it launched is still very competitive, Olympus itself is a medical optical equipment, coupled with Panasonic's technology in electronics, the market share of these two companies is also increasing.

Kodak has long stopped playing DSLR, and now makes money by selling card machines for entertainment and producing CCDs.

As for Canon and Nikon, they have been fighting each other since the sideshaft era and have not been able to distinguish between winners and losers, and the first and second positions in market share are still very solid, and they also have their own strengths.

The best: Canon, Nikon, of course, are the best brands. Sony is not bad either.

In Japan, Casio also sells less than Canon Nikon.

Worst: Kodak, BenQ.

The question is general.

In DSLR cameras, Canon is suitable for sports, journalism, commercial photography. Nikon is suitable for use in journalistic, sports, and working environments under harsh conditions. Fujifilm is suitable for commercial photography. Olympus portrait photography is also good, and the others are not recommended.

Among the consumer-level card machines, the most unselectable is Nikon (Nikon), followed by Kodak, Samsung, Ricoh, and BenQ are the garbage in the garbage, don't even think about it.

Obediently, someone actually said that Fuji is the worst, have you ever touched the camera? Do you still go to Gome Suning to buy it? Slaughtered, huh?

BenQ's is a little worse. Canon's best.

The Canon A720 brand is a bit better than the other two, and both are about the same in terms of quality.

Canon's brand sales have been firmly in the first place in recent years.

Canon A720 is my experience of using it.

Canon A720 IS is a Canon A series digital camera, with good photographic performance and stylish appearance, A720 IS is a Canon A series digital camera with optical image stabilization, the current price of this camera is about 2200 yuan.

The Canon A720 IS features a 1-inch CCD with 8 million effective pixels and a maximum resolution of 3272 2304. A 6x optical zoom lens with a focal length equivalent to that of a conventional 35mm camera with a focal length equivalent to that of a conventional 35mm camera is 35-210mm. The shutter speed is 15 - 1 2000 seconds, the sensitivity range is ISO80 800, and the IS optical image stabilization meets the requirements of double image stabilization, which can make shooting easier and reduce the difficulty of shooting in low-light environments.

From the outside, the A720 IS continues to follow the design style of the A710, and the combination of silver and black makes the aircraft more contemporary. The handle has a silver curved design, which feels quite good in the hand. The shell of the fuselage is made of high-strength engineering plastics, and the surface layer has been specially treated.

With a body weight of 210g, it is very convenient to carry.

The A720 IS uses an inch LCD, and although it only has 10,000 pixels, the actual display is quite good, and the retention of the optical viewfinder also gives us more framing options. The A720 IS also features Auto Program, Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, and Full Manual** modes, giving users the freedom to be creative and shoot as they please. It has the function of manually adjusting the ISO speed and customizing the white balance.

Using an SD SDHC MMC card as the storage medium, the battery system can use 2 No. 5 batteries (2200AM rechargeable NiMH batteries are available) for approximately 200 shots**.

On the whole, A720 IS has mainstream parameter equipment, 6x optical zoom, powerful manual functions, especially the optical image stabilization function makes the performance of the machine more excellent, with a high cost performance, I bought a self-feeling very easy to use, for your purchase reference (A710 is cheaper about 200 yuan, 7.1 million pixels, and 8 million pixels are not much different, other functions are exactly the same).

A720 is good.

All three are good, I recommend Fujifilm (of course, there are many excellent machines).

I'm doing digital printing, and I feel that Fujifilm's colors are a little more vibrant.

Check out the April 2006 Hot DC Rankings! From the famous Pacific Computer Network.

Introduction: 5 million effective pixels, 1-inch CCD, 4x optical zoom lens, inch rotatable LCD

Runner-up: Product model: Sony DSC-T9

4th to 10th place:

TOP4 Nikon D50

4450 yuan.

TOP5 Sony DSC-W100

2980 yuan.

TOP6Fuji FifinePix S9000 Zoom 4699 yuan.

TOP7 Canon Digital Ixus 800 IS3320 yuan.

TOP8 Sony DSC-H2

3450 yuan.

TOP9 Panasonic DMC-FX01

3099 yuan.

TOP10 Kodak V603

2399 yuan.

DC, choose Canon. Then you see:

In general, the imaging of the canon is delicate, the color and ** are accurate, and the lines are on the soft side. Nikon's imaging is relatively sharp. Sony is stylish and functional.

Fuji's imaging is colorful and forgiving. Olympus, Kodak, Pentax, Konicaminolta, Ricoh, and Samsung also have their own styles. In addition, Canon's IS stabilization and high-sensitivity image quality, Nikon's VR stabilization and face autofocus technology, Fuji's brilliant colors in the reversal film mode, and KM's AS stabilization were also considered.

Camera brands can only be roughly divided according to market share, and each style is the difference between turnip and cabbage, and only the user has the final say, and things like rankings are meaningless. It can only be said: most people's choices are correct, and yours is not bad.

I'm also struggling with the Canon SX240Or Sony's HX30,

It's pretty much the same in terms of performance! But durability doesn't have to be the same!! I love Canon's! That's pretty durable!!

Kodak, Canon, Olympus, Casio, Nikon,

It's better to say according to the pinpai, but it depends on the price you pay!

Canon, Nikon, Sony, Fujifilm, Kodak, Panasonic, Casio, Olympus, Samsung.

The ranking is not absolute, different people will have a little different rankings, but Canon ranks first in terms of camera sales and product technical quality, and it is well deserved!

The average strength is c>n s>f k o others, but there are differences in machines with different prices and configurations, and according to personal usage habits and aesthetic views, radish and cabbage have their own love. So it's useless to just look at the brand.