The strength of Britain and China, which is stronger?

It depends on the period.

The history of Great Britain is much later than that of China, and in the 2nd and 4th centuries A.D., the Angles and Saxons, the branches of the Germanic peoples, landed and started the history of Britain (roughly... To learn more, please take a look).

Therefore, England created an absolute monarchy around the fifteenth century, and Elizabeth I of the Tudor dynasty defeated Spain and initially established Britain's maritime supremacy. From this time onwards, Britain gradually developed (mainly under the influence of bourgeois democratic ideas), and China was complacent and closed off from the rest of the country during this period. You know.

However, after World War II, Britain was also hit hard and depended on the United States. Nowadays, we are actively seeking independent development, getting rid of the dilemma of being governed by others, attaching more importance to bilateral relations with China, and having a relatively friendly attitude towards China

Do you still need to ask, it must be China strong! Otherwise, how can you get it back to Hong Kong! Isn't it?

The total amount is strong in China.

Britannia per capita.

United Kingdom? The ruined aristocracy had the highest productivity in the world, the strongest navy, and now it has lost almost all of its colonies, the population is small, and there is no decent industry after deindustrialization, so that the economic strength is inferior to that of Germany and France, and it is also backward in armaments, and there is no money to build aircraft carriers, and the military strength of China, the United States, and Russia is even worse.

The sun has long since fallen, so why do you think Britain is willing to return Hong Kong.

It must be the United Kingdom, the currency war that Britain is mainly playing now, look at the US Congress, many of them are controlled by the British plutocracy, and now the war is not just hardware, and the Soviet Union does not let the United States play with the economy to collapse.

China's military strength is strong!

Pla.

To be honest, I think it should be the UK.

In terms of military strength, Britain is definitely strong, Germany is a defeated country in World War II, and its army is subject to international restrictions. Britain still has nuclear **, and if there is a war, Germany dares to move Britain to try it? In terms of economic strength, Germany is slightly stronger than Britain.

Although Britain used to be known as the empire on which the sun never sets, there are still overseas colonies and Commonwealth countries in its current location.

The advantage of Britain is that it is cousins of the United States, the language is also dominant in the world, and it is an old capitalist country. The disadvantage is that the island nation has little room for development, and after moving away from the Age of Discovery, Britain's previous maritime advantage is shrinking.

Germany has the advantage of being an established country on the European continent. Compared with the United Kingdom, simply put, it has convenient transportation on the mainland, small transportation costs, developed high-tech industries, and its disadvantages are not very obvious compared with the United Kingdom. If it had not been for the constraints of the United Nations, it would have surpassed Britain, France and other European countries in military strength.

What the two countries have in common is that they belong to the same Anglo-Saxons.

Although the current German army is mature in military technology, due to the defeat of the Nazis in World War II, various restrictions have been made. , to put it mildly, if the current strength of Germany really can't beat the British army at all, Britain is very old and spicy in politics and tactics and strategy, all kinds of routines to hook you and then give you a wave, let you break instantly, at the minimum price, for you the largest**. No matter how the sun sets in Britain, he is also the P5, militarily, and France has absolute dominance and right to speak.

All three countries are world powers, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. At present, Germany is stronger, followed by Britain and France, and among the EU countries, only France can wrestle with Germany. Of course, this is also because the UK has left the European Union and is no longer an EU country.

Germany is awesome! How to say it, militarily Germany is deeply hidden! Economically, Germany is the leader of the European Union! With a large population and a large European continent, Britain is only a small island country, more than France!

It must be England, the emaciated camel is bigger than the horse, the Germans are Germanic, not Anglo-Saxon (a tribal confederation of ancient Germans who migrated to Britain after crossing the sea, the Anglo and Saxon tribes are the mainstay, and there are smaller tribes such as Jud) and the Anglo-Saxon language (English) is Latinized Germanic, and German is purely Germanic.

Germany is the third largest economy in the world. Second only to the United States and Japan.

Germany's greatest disadvantage was that it was treated as a defeated country.

But I still think Germany is stronger.

Britain has thoroughly followed the United States.

I think Haier is better.

The comprehensive strength of Haier is stronger, the scale is larger, the product line is wider, and the global factory. Hisense focuses on domestic brand management and marketing, and its technical strength is more rigorous.

Wars are fought against the country's wartime sustaining capability. Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty attacked Goguryeo three times, and the domestic rebellion and uprising did not stop and the country was destroyed. And the British Empire after the Industrial Revolution is undoubtedly stable and stable. Before the industry, it depends on what kind of war is fought, and no one has broken the Yuan Dynasty in land warfare.

Compared with China's comprehensive strength, it is definitely China's strength. First, China's development is more comprehensive than India's, and China has made amazing achievements in the past 30 years of reform and opening up. Second, both in terms of total volume and individual income, it surpasses India.

Third, China's infrastructure is much better than India's.

It must be China! First of all, in terms of ideology, India is much worse than China. Very feudal. They are also in a poor environment. Not to mention the economy.

India's per capita GDP is more than that of China, that is, the total economic output per square kilometer is much higher than that of China, and the per capita GDP will not exceed that of China, and the total amount is lower than that of China. Some areas of industry and technology are stronger than China's.

China's comprehensive strength is stronger!

Almost, all of them are developing countries.

I don't want you to ask this question, don't you read the news, don't watch current affairs, don't you know the world? It is an indisputable fact that India ranks ninth in the world in terms of comprehensive national strength, China ranks third, and it is second in the economic field. I saw a high praise saying that India's per capita disposable income is much higher than China's, and I can't help but ask this question.

In addition to the software foundry and generic drugs that India has made certain achievements, it is far lower than China in the fields of national defense, national economy, and education.

In our coverage, Indians are ...... of train crowding, slums, rural disadvantage, and poor sanitationNone of them can be put on the table, not even the military equipment of the United States. However, after reading this article, I suddenly realized that India dared to call China so loudly. Know the lack and then be brave, work hard, China!

After all, Ah San now has a very large population in the middle and lower age groups (because India Ah San has released childbearing, regardless of population growth), if it is not limited by the caste system, with the potential of Ah San, it is estimated that it can still develop more strongly (although it may still be inferior to China).

Compared with India, it is too humiliating, and the natural disasters have been stronger than it for three years. How not to compare with the United States.

Almost, no one is better than anyone else. There are many Yelang who watch the sky from the bottom of the well. I remember looking at a distant home and a Chinese construction company building a resort for an Indian owner.

There are also Indians who work in Chinese companies. Due to the difference in political systems, the people at the bottom of China are treated better than the people at the bottom of India, which looks like the period of China's reform and opening up on the surface, but if you go deeper, you will find that they are not so unbearable. Middle and upper echelons of India.

It is no exaggeration to say that India is not worthy of being China's opponent at present, we defeated them 50 years ago, and it will be very easy to defeat India in 50 years.

War is to fight money, so first of all, take stock of the comparison of the economic strength of China and India, how big is the gap between the national strength of China and India, and the economic comparison of India's GDP is about 40% of China's.

Militarily, first of all, look at military technology, India's missile technology is about the same level as China in the 70s and 80s of the last century, the gap is more than 20 years, and the level of India's Agni missiles cannot reach China's level.

At that time, China already had intercontinental missiles and nuclear submarines, and India still did not have the ability to develop these two technologies independently.

The blue sky anti-aircraft missile developed by India has the same body as the Sam-6 of the former Soviet Union, and the Trident low-altitude missile has serious technical problems, and its performance is not as good as the Red 7 developed by China in the 80s.

Generally speaking, India's military technology mainly relies on imports, and it can only produce its own in some aspects, such as computers, and of course, ICs must be imported.

China is strong, and India's ** are all imported foreign goods, which are troublesome enough to match, and the quality of the army is poor, so they can't fight each other against China.