Will the Americans really not abandon their compatriots when they are fighting?

Thinking too much about the big brother.

The United States is allowed to surrender.

Don't you know about the Benghazi incident?

In 2011, the situation in Libya deteriorated, and a US military was shot down by a Stinger missile.

Due to the dumb fire of the missiles, there was no **.

Later, the US military investigated and found that the missile was something of the "Clinton Grants."

At that time, Benghazi, the second largest city in Libya, was in high anti-American sentiment because of the online short film "Muslim's Ignorance".

The local US ambassador sent more than 600 emails to then US Secretary of State Hillary asking for help, but Hillary ignored them.

Later, the U.S. Embassy was breached by Libyan armed elements, and the ambassador was killed.

This incident, which was also made public by WikiLeaks, is one of the most famous black spots in the Hillary Postgate affair.

The world is as black as a crow, brother.

The Benghazi incident has been put on hold.

Last year, Hillary Clinton's mailgate was made public.

Of the six people who set out to investigate Hillary's mailgate scandal, five have died so far.

When there is a condition, blow more, and what is even more rare is that someone consciously and voluntarily helps to blow.

Not to mention on the battlefield, it is not once or twice that a veteran has been killed by the Army with a gun, MacArthur commanded as the Army Chief of Staff, and Patton also played.

The Americans are the descendants of tough immigrants, aggressive, and they are the only ones in the great powers except the Russians.

The state power in the United States is supported by many conglomerates, and those elections are also paid by the conglomerates, and a large part of these consortia are arms dealers. Like Boeing, Thor, Loxeded. Martin is more famous for these.

After they are elected, they will have to work for the interests of those consortia, and this is a must. So in recent years, there has been a war in each of them: of course, it is not only the arms dealers, but also the overall national interest of the United States, which is that the Americans are unwilling to put their national hegemony at risk.

It is inevitable that people will die in battle, but there is only a difference between more and fewer deaths. If there are too many deaths, the American people will not be able to stand it, and most people will oppose it, just like the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Afghanistan War. Of course, there is also the emotional factor of losing a loved one, and there is also a patriotic factor, and there is a fear that the country will be weakened after a long-term war.

Every time there is a war, there is opposition from the Americans, like the war in Libya, there are also opponents.

Dead person? In peacetime, many people die every day in accidents. It is possible to fight a war, but for the sake of their own people, the American people sometimes agree.

The opponents are not those in power, no matter how loud their voices are, and the Vietnam War stopped not only because of the anti-war movement in the United States, but also because he could not win.

There is a lot of opposition from the people, since the Korean War after World War II, and in all wars.

However, the point is that the ruling party will not heed the cries of the people, and for the capitalist social state, it must be loyal to the interests of the ruling party and the big capitalists. The U.S. economy extends to the whole world, and its military tentacles will follow the whole world. It's a given.

When Japan invaded China, did his people oppose it? Stupid, who is against it for the sake of the nation? Little Japan should have disappeared from the face of the earth a long time ago!!

For the sake of profit, for the sake of oil, it is useless to oppose it,