Can Germany, at the height of World War II, beat what is now Vietnam?

Yes, at the peak of World War II, Germany had a lot of equipment, and the tank formation alone was completely enough to push the current Vietnam to the ground.

It can't be beaten, Germany and the current Vietnam ** equipment is several generations behind, and Vietnam's land, sea and air completely crush Germany. The Vietnamese Air Force has three generations of fighters, assault rifles of the army, rocket launchers, various anti-tank **, armed ***, and more than 10 million soldiers. Not at all in the same level.

There is a generation gap, no matter how many planes and tanks Nazi Germany has, it is not enough for Vietnamese missiles to fight, and what blitzkrieg cannot be used at all, the times are different, ** is not a level anymore.

Can't beat it. At that time, Germany's ** could not be compared with now, and no matter how underdeveloped Vietnam was, their ** was decades ahead of them.

Isn't this TM nonsense, it's not a period.

Vietnam was a French colony before World War II, occupied by Japan during World War II, and the Viet Cong established the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (also known as "North Vietnam") in the north in 1945 around the end of the Second Great Dou Hu War. After that, the Viet Cong negotiated a nine-year Franco-Vietnamese war with France. In 1954, France withdrew from northern Vietnam.

According to the resolution of the Geneva Conference (1954), North and South Vietnam were temporarily divided under the 17th parallel, North Vietnam was ruled by Ho Chi Minh City, and South Vietnam was under the control of Emperor Bao Dai. [Iron-Blooded Community.]

In 1959, the Viet Cong decided to unify Vietnam by force and sent a large number of military personnel to South Vietnam to organize an armed uprising. In 1960, the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam, controlled by the Viet Cong, was formed. By 1961, the National Liberation Front had taken control of most of the countryside in South Vietnam, and U.S. combat units began to enter Vietnam.

In 1964, after the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the United States officially intervened in the Vietnam Civil War, which led to the escalation of the Vietnam War.

In 1973, the United States gradually withdrew its troops from Vietnam due to the anti-war wave at home. By January 2, 1976, when North and South Vietnam were reunited to form the new Socialist Republic of Vietnam, hundreds of South Vietnamese supporters were executed, and many more**. The Viet Cong took power and has ruled to this day.

Please see the references for details.

Summary. Hello dear, Germany in World War II did not directly attack Vietnam, because Vietnam was a French colony during World War II, and there was no need to attack, just enter directly.

Did Germany attack Vietnam in World War II? There are several signed battles.

Hello dear, Germany in World War II did not directly attack Vietnam, because Vietnam was a French colony during World War II, and there was no need to attack, just enter directly.

In 1858, under the pretext of protecting missionaries, the French ** entangled the Spanish fleet to shell the central Vietnamese port of Da Nang. In l884, the Nguyen Dynasty was forced to sign a new treaty of surrender with the French Withered Belt, officially recognizing Vietnam as a French protectorate. After Vietnam officially became a French colony, the French colonists divided Vietnam into three

The southern part is called Cochinchina (also known as Nanqi), which is directly ruled by the French, with the capital of Saigon; The central part is called Annam (also known as Zhongqi), which is a kingdom under the "protection" of France, with its capital Hue; The northern part is called Tokyo (also known as Beiqi), which was "ceded" by the Kingdom of Vietnam to the French, with the capital Hanoi. The French had a large number of troops in Na Ching in Vietnam, which was under the command of the Governor-General in Vietnam. The Governor's Office consists of the War Department and the Admiralty.

Therefore, during World War II, Vietnam was not attacked because it had become a colony.

Not necessarily1 At that time, Vietnam had the support of China and the Soviet Union, and was generally equipped with automatic **, with strong squad firepower, rockets, 155 artillery pieces (during the Battle of Dien Bien Phu) heavy tanks aided by the Soviet Union, combat training provided by China, and a small number of jet fighters in the air force, such as the MiG series, although the navy was inferior to Japan, and the air force was inferior to Japan in quantity, but the quality was higher than that of Japan, and the comprehensive combat effectiveness of individual soldiers was higher than that of Japan. But due to the inherent naval and air inferiority, it will bring huge ** to Vietnam.

2 Therefore, if you have to fight one-on-one, Japan will be dragged into the quagmire of war like the United States, because, although you have a strong navy and air force, you have no advantage on land, Japan's class firepower is poor, mainly rifles, lack of class suppressive firepower similar to RPK, lack of anti-tank firepower, once Vietnam establishes a consolidated anti-aircraft firepower, and uses MiG series air superiority fighters to master air supremacy in a certain area, it is difficult for the Japanese army to give full play to the advantages of large ships and huge guns. Its propeller fighter was dwarfed by the MiG.

3 In the end, the conclusion was that it would become Japan's version of the Vietnam War (Japan, like the United States: absolute naval and air superiority, but the United States would eventually be mired in war because it could not stand on the ground).

Yes. Vietnam did not have a navy or air force at that time. The Army is also a notch off.

In World War II, Japan occupied almost the entire Eastern Hemisphere, and Vietnam only stubbornly resisted the United States at home, which is related to strategy, tactics, logistics, and supplies, and in terms of tactics, Vietnam fought a guerrilla war of movement, and did not clash head-on with the United States, on the other hand, the United States tanks and planes could not be used in the mountains, just like the Korean War was finally fixed at the 38th parallel, just because South Korea was Pyongcheon, North Korea was mountainous, and then there was a supply The Japanese army relied on self-sufficiency and looting in World War II, and Vietnam relied on the Ho Chi Minh Trail to keep transfusing blood There is another important point The Japanese army was the grandfather of the US military in mountain warfare, and this can be seen in the battles of Okinawa, Yunnan, and the Pacific Islands.

No, that's cultivation.

When it comes to World War II, everyone should think of Russia and Germany, which performed very eye-catching, right? It is one of the main initiators of World War II, almost invincible on the battlefield of World War II, extremely strong combat effectiveness, at that time, Germany's industrial level is one of the best in the world, able to develop advanced military **, in terms of tactics, Germany also has an advanced combat system, so Germany during World War II can be said to be recognized as strong, some people will ask, thatAt the height of World War II, could Germany win against Vietnam?

First of all, we all know that Germany's extremely famous tactics at that time were blitzkrieg, but the blitzkrieg was only able to be implemented when it seized air supremacy. At that time, most of the fighters used by the German army were FW-190, BF109 and other fighters, and now Vietnam is equipped with Su-27, MiG-21, MiG-23M is almost incomparable, after all, the rapid progress of science and technology, the speed of updating equipment is unimaginable, and the leap in performance is also extremely wide. In front of today's Vietnam, Germany usesBlitzkrieg didn't play any role either

Looking at the navy again, even if Vietnam's ships are not enough in terms of quantity and quality in the international scope, the advantage over Germany during World War II is still not small, and the two armies will most likely win against Vietnam.

Finally, looking at the army, the German artillery at that time did not have a very wide range, and the maneuverability was also average, and it was still a little difficult to deal with the Caesar 155 mm self-propelled guns imported in large quantities in Vietnam today. ** Large number and strong capability, Vietnam still has an advantage in the army.

Moreover, although Vietnam's economy has not been very good, but Germany at the peak of World War II also faced economic problems, and the German army was likely to be able to fight because it vented its economic worries to the battle, and in the end, part of the reason for Germany's defeat was that the economy could not keep up, so the two countries faced off, and it is very likely that Vietnam has a slight advantage.

The main reason why Vietnam was difficult to fight was that they made full use of their geographical advantages, and even the United States, which was the world's largest in national strength and military strength at that time, could not achieve a complete victory with a huge advantage in land, sea and air, so even Germany at its peak could not completely defeat Vietnam. However, if the advantages of jungle terrain and guerrilla warfare are removed, Germany can still defeat the current Vietnam, because even in the 21st century, Vietnam does not have absolute superiority in equipment.

Germany at the peak of World War II could completely crush Vietnam, Germany's military strength was the first in the world at that time, and Vietnam's military strength can be said to be not worth mentioning at all.

Can't beat it. There is no way to compare the ** of the Second World War with the present, so Germany at its peak cannot defeat the current Vietnam.

Yes, Vietnam's overall economic and military development is not very advanced, on the contrary, Germany at the peak of World War II was very strong, and I think Germany can completely defeat Vietnam.