I want to do photography and understand the camera, thank you

I want to tell you that photography is not about equipment. Not in the lens. It's in your own head.

The equipment can be put in place in one step, as long as it is comfortable to use. 5D is not successful, but 5DII is still good.

If you want to buy something for forty or fifty thousand. Tell you to buy it this way, the stand-alone machine is 5DII or Nikon D700, two lenses are enough, one is 24-70, the other is 70-200, enough enough. You're the best photographer in the world, and that's enough.

I'm from the Nikon family. Starting with the Nikon D50 and ending with the D3X, most of them are available. Plus 5dii, mostly for collections.

Usually only D80 and D300 are used. I also won the national silver award, which was taken by the card machine. That's it.

A good machine is not as good as a lens, and a good lens is not as good as a good brain.

With the 5D Mark II plus 24-70 plus the 70-200 IS plus the Portrait King Lens 85 is already very, very professional.

On the top floor, if commercial photography you need good equipment to show yourself and, ultimately, good technique.

W350 is just a general card machine, the performance is OK, the focal length is also more practical, and it is enough for home use. But the picture quality is not very good. Below 3000**You can consider WX5C, which will be better than W350, that is, about 2000.

With the S95 focal length, the image quality is better than that of other card players, and the high ISO noise control is also very good. It's just that the distortion is very serious, and if it is not corrected later, it will be very bad, and it is not recommended. At the same price, I recommend the Panasonic LX3, which has an equivalent 24mm ultra-wide angle and a 1-inch sensor, which will have better image quality and color.

290 from the function of only shooting**, flipping**. Nothing else. Sony's lenses are nothing outstanding, and if you don't plan to invest in the later stage, you can only buy a sleeve, that is, buy a camera that can only take pictures with better image quality than DC.

If you think that's acceptable, I won't stop you from buying it. But I don't actually recommend it.

The D3000 is functionally similar to the Sony 290, but the difference is in the lens group, depending on the preference. If you don't change the lens, I don't recommend the D3000 compared to the two, because it's almost an old machine, and the 290 is a new one.

Sum up. If you want to buy a card machine, I recommend the Sony WX5 at 2000 and the LX3 at 3000.

If you want to be a DSLR, it's better to save some money and buy a better one.

People like the landlord,If the landlord comes into contact with the SLR,Will definitely spend more money on a DSLR,After all, the gap between the image quality of the SLR and the home machine is too big,When the time comes, the 3000 will not be a certain fate。 So it's better to simply come in one step and be more affordable, hehe. Now more than 3000 points online can also buy a new SLR set, such as Pentax KX, in fact, the more people who ask for the most, the more they will burn money endlessly, so I hope the landlord will keep a sane when playing SLR, hehe.

No more than 3000 can only buy a card machine to play Hazi, if you have the pursuit, you still buy a SLR, now the SLR is not very expensive, a little more than 4000 can also buy an entry SLR, much stronger than the card machine, **quality is not a concept at all!

To be honest, I think that since you are considering a standby SLR, these cards you choose are not at the standby level, and Panasonic LX5, Canon G11, and G12 are recommended

3 years ago, I had the same idea as you, through the feeling of using SLR for 3 years: 1. Any machine will shoot good works with heart;

2. The machine is not proportional to the pursuit, and it is not possible to shoot a good work with a SLR; 3. Understand the purpose of playing with the camera, whether it is to burn the machine or to shoot good works, whether it is to engage in portraits, landscapes, macros or general household use; If you understand, it's good to set goals.

Hehe. The landlord is still very quick, think about it, P90's 24x large zoom lens, what good picture quality can be produced.

The advantage of the telephoto camera is that the background of the telephoto portrait (headshot) is dotted.

P90 is to support the full manual function, many card machines do not support other portraits that avoid the background blur that most novices like, and the high-end card machine is still superior in all aspects. Now, more than 2,500 cards with full manual functions and no more than 5x zoom are not bad. Get rid of Sony's flashy cards.

Photography is a combination of light and shadow.

Of the three machines you listed, the Nikon P90 is better. Most of the models you choose are telephoto machines, it is recommended to consider the lower aperture, models with more than 1 inch image sensor, although the focal length is smaller, but the image quality is better.

What is the landlord's budget? The ** of these cameras are all about 1,000 yuan, and the difference is not big, so it's enough to shoot clearly**use**. If you want me to recommend, in fact, the landlord can buy a Canon or Nikon entry SLR, the effect is far better than the card.

For example, like Canon's 600d, etc.

The machines of about 1,000 are about the same, just buy one with a better macro effect.

You can only use an outdated second-hand machine. The new one can only be bought and put on the door. I have a friend who does this, you can look up "0871 Commercial Photography" and ask them.

Just to tell you, definitely don't buy Sony DCR-SX21E, it's too vague. I really didn't know that Sony would produce such a garbage product.

Of course, Canon is the first choice for buyers.

Recommended: Canon IXUS125 HS (16.1 million pixels, LCD screen, 5x light variation, 24mm wide angle).

or Canon Power Shot A4000 IS (16 million pixels, LCD screen, 8x light variation, 28mm wide angle).

This is a small track for making a small movie or a follow-up shot.

Micro Movie! Wedding follow-up, etc.

Actually, it's a beginner for everyone. Photography is simply about getting the composition right and the aperture and speed of the shot.

The combination of aperture and velocity simply means that the speed is inversely proportional to the aperture, and the faster the speed, the greater the aperture opening (the smaller the number marked on the camera). When practicing, you can take a picture on the automatic mode (or not actually shoot, just look at the data from the viewfinder), and then manually adjust the parameters according to the data on the automatic mode. You can also shoot directly in aperture priority or speed priority mode.

There are many methods of composition, and there should be a certain degree of artistry or innovation, you can look up some fixed patterns on the Internet, but if you completely follow the fixed pattern of vertical rough photos, I am afraid that there is a lack of innovation.

All in all, learning photography well requires a lot of time and constant experience.

As for the blue color you said, I haven't used a Nikon camera before, so I don't dare to talk nonsense, but you can look at the following parameters, because it is a manual mode, whether the white balance is not adjusted well (under different lighting), or the sensitivity (ISO) parameter is incorrect.