If you don t have money, will you have children?

No. Although it is said that children are the crystallization of the love of husband and wife, have you ever thought about the future of having a child? <>

Giving birth to a child, can you bear to let him eat bad milk powder? Although it is not said to eat the best, but the child is very fragile, if you give him a bad milk powder, then if there is any accident, who can be responsible? Moreover, the baby's nutrition must be guaranteed, and you let him lack such nutrients and lack such nutrients since he was a child, won't you feel guilty?

Can you bear it? What the child wants to eat you can't buy for him, he just watched other friends eat, the trauma to his soul is difficult for you to make up, although he may be very sensible, and will not say, but it does not mean that he does not want, other friends have a lot of fun toys, that is, your child all day long with a very cheap car slid over and slid over, he must be difficult to be happy. If because of your lack of money, your friends don't like him, don't play with him, and may even alienate him, is this what you want to see?

Maybe you think that as long as you feel happy, it doesn't matter if you have more money or less, but you should give your children a better life. Maybe you think that you can work hard to make money, you do business, but you always have to drag a child, so for you, for the child, it is undoubtedly a pain, you are running around and tired alone, even if you are tired from running around alone, do you want the child to accompany you to run around and work tirelessly or stay up all night? Can you bear to watch your child be perceived as inferior by other children because of your poverty?

Your kids want to see Sea World, and you don't have the money. Do you want your children to suffer these sins because you have no money? <>

If you have a child, you should be responsible for the child. If you can't give him a good life, don't have children, and don't let your children suffer with you, okay. <>

No, you can't feed yourself without money, you have a child, and you don't have a way to live, now it's different from the past, the child is born, you can feed it, not to mention, after giving birth, how to raise, just from preparing for pregnancy to the birth of the baby, the expenses during this period of time, you need money to keep it, no money, how to have a prenatal checkup, no money, how to supplement nutrition, no money, when you need to choose a natural birth or a caesarean section, how to choose? ! and so on.

Moreover, if you plan to have a baby, you need to take on the responsibility of being a parent, no money, the milk powder money for the birth of the child, the cost of follow-up education, which are all great expenses, today's mortgage, car loan pressure, has enough to overwhelm the two young people, if you do not prepare enough funds to give birth to a baby, how can you ensure to provide a good, normal growth environment for the child.

Some time ago, I read a sentence, child, the meaning of your efforts now is to choose your future life more freely, not just for a salary! I think this sentence can also be understood as, children, the meaning of my current efforts is to provide you with more roads for you to choose in the future, so that you can choose a favorite road to go on, just imagine, if we have money, is it possible to cultivate children's interests and hobbies, provide children with more options to choose from, choose what you like. If there is no money, these things cannot be achieved at all, and the most basic living conditions are problematic, how can you think about cultivating your children's own interests and hobbies.

For the better growth of the child, I will definitely not have a baby without money, give birth to her, I want to give her the best, not in embarrassment, because of her arrival, and more embarrassed!

This is a real problem, as we all know that raising children is a very difficult thing nowadays, as the saying goes, only women and children are difficult to raise, raising children is indeed a thing that costs money and consumes manpower. If you can't afford to raise a child without money, because having a child is a very expensive thing, it is difficult to move an inch in the society without money, it is difficult to survive without money, if you can't even take care of your own income, how can you take care of your children, we will give your children a good living environment, a good educational environment, then this all needs money, and you don't have so much ability to give your children, so consider not having children first, and when you have the ability, you are almost having children. Anyway, I'm still young, and nothing is impossible to be young!

There are many things to consider when children are born, children's food, clothing, housing and transportation, all need money, the most important point is that children still have to go to school to receive education, and now children's education is also a large expense, in short, if you don't have money, you still consider not having children for the time being, but some couples will not decide whether to have children because of whether they have children, and some couples live without children relative to something less. The traditional Chinese concept of unfilial piety is great, giving the husband and wife the feeling that if they do not have children, they will be the last thought, in fact, Mr. children through the later efforts of the husband and wife to improve their economic ability, this is also a good way, as long as through their own efforts there is no difficulty that can not be overcome.

So if you don't have money, it's not that you can't have children, it still depends on your own thoughts

<> the answer, of course, is no. The baby is cute, but we should consider more things, such as his growth costs, whether we can afford it, whether we can create his environment, whether we can give him a good educational background, and whether we can deal with his future path relatively flat, but if there is no money, all this is difficult.

First of all, if you don't have money, your baby's baby will start to be inferior during her growing years. For example, if you don't have money milk powder, you can only buy public milk, diapers can only buy cheap, you want to buy a good crib for your baby, it's just, it's prohibitive in front of the five figures, you want to buy toys with non-polluting materials for your baby, weigh it ** or buy inferior dolls, plastic carts. There is always a gap between reality and ideals, you want to give the baby better, but you have no ability to do it, you blame the baby with some bad things, but also envy other families, but also to their own self-esteem to blow, so from the moment the baby is born, there is no as simple as you imagined.

When the baby begins to grow up, the biggest problem is education. Rich people give their babies to large kindergartens with excellent environments, of course, the tuition fees are tens of thousands, and there is no money, the kindergarten downstairs in the community, a few small rooms, the teachers are also uneducated, and the fruits they eat are like in the news, wholesale inferior fruits, and the poor quality of the teachers will mislead the children. When you go to elementary school, your family can't afford to buy a school district house because they don't have the money, so you can only send your children to some third-rate schools.

Primary school is a good stage for children's enlightenment education, and it is also a good time to learn diversification, but in third-rate schools, there are not many classes every day, just Chinese and mathematics, and physical education classes without technical content, and then ignore the students. If you don't have a good junior high school in junior high school, you can't go to a good high school, and if you don't have a good high school, you can hardly go to a good university. Therefore, the problem of education is a bigger problem for children, and the imbalance of educational resources is also an indisputable fact, so it is better not to have children if you have no money.

If you don't have money, you should have children. But it is possible to consider the problem in a comprehensive way:

In first- and third-tier cities, the mortgage is hundreds of thousands. That is to say, at least the monthly payment needs thousands, thousands, not to explain, under the mortgage of hundreds of thousands, the woman currently has no job. If you don't have a job, then hurry up and find a job, because parents can't help bring it to your child before kindergarten, you have to bring it yourself, so please prepare your savings for the three years of quitting.

Second, parents can't help with the baby, to what extent can't they take it. Can't the woman's and man's parents help take care of the baby?

If there is one party to bring, then it is not a big problem.

3. The man can only go to the first-tier city to work overtime, and the woman can only go back to the third-tier city, depending on the problem, the salary in the first-tier city should be high, and the woman cannot be taken care of. Then, when the woman goes back to the third-tier city and looks at the description of the problem, there should be someone who can take care of her. If yes, then the second description is slapped in the face.

To sum up, money is not the main reason for whether to have children or not, whether there is energy to take care of it, whether there is someone to take care of it, is what the subject is worried about. Someone takes care of it, and the money can naturally come. If there is no one to take care of you, then you can postpone having a child, at least save enough money to ensure that there is no big problem with expenses before the child can let go.

I don't think so. In fact, whether to have children or not depends not on economic conditions, but on whether the husband and wife have reached a consensus to give their children a stable future and growth environment.

Men and women who struggle with whether or not to have children because of difficult living conditions are actually very responsible parents and should be recognized and praised. How so? The former is a hundred times stronger than those who give birth without thinking about the future at will.

Children are not cats and dogs, and they can't come and go as soon as they want. Many children are abandoned and given away, and many children experience the pain of family breakdown when they are minors, all of which are caused by the irresponsibility of their parents. As a qualified adult, after giving birth to a child, you must support and educate you, and you can't willfully let your child suffer harm from an early age, nor can you leave it alone to add a burden to society.

A child's experience of happiness is not about being rich or poor, but about whether they can be cared for by their parents. Young people who have just started a family may have very average economic conditions, and they feel that they cannot provide their children with a comfortable living environment and are hesitant to have children. In fact, if the relationship between the husband and wife is stable, the life goal is clear, having children is a natural thing, financial difficulties are only temporary, as long as you work hard, everything will change.

However, the risk of blindly waiting until the economy improves to have children is that the economic conditions are better but the physical conditions are declining, and missing the best childbearing age is just as cruel to the children!

In fact, having a child is closely related to a person's age, and economic conditions are not too important. But having said that, in the face of reality, you can't live a normal life without too many children without money, so you should still choose according to your own conditions!

Many people advise that if you don't have money and are too poor, you don't want to have children.

Many people have argued that if you are too poor and have no money, it is best not to have children. In this regard, many people disagree and express their incomprehension, and feel that having children is a very appropriate thing, in order for human beings to continue, and to allow a family's incense to continue.

thinks that having children has nothing to do with wealth or poverty, as long as children can come into this world, then they can actually be supported no matter what. I feel that the words of not having children seem inhumane and should not be advised.

Speaking of which, a man marries a woman, to a large extent, is actually for the sake of inheritance, so if you don't want children because of poor economic conditions, then the marriage no longer seems so meaningful and will no longer be so stable. Having a child seems to be a natural thing, and you shouldn't think so much and be limited by anything. However, many people will say this, and they are not casually saying that there is actually a deeper reason behind the stuffiness of Yinju.