One of the reasons for the success of Qin s reform was that the state owned land became privately ow

1. The change of state ownership of land to private ownership was not the beginning of the Qin state, but the Qin state reform affirmed the permanence of the peasants' land ownership in the form of a decree.

Second, it is not necessary to say that the change of state ownership of land to private ownership will enhance the enthusiasm of labor. Under the pre-Qin state ownership system (Jingtian system): in an area with a "li" as a unit, public land was set aside, and all the peasants in the "li" worked together on the public land, and the output of the public land was used as a tax.

The rest of the land is divided equally among the peasants of the "li" as a share, and the land is rotated regularly, and the output of the land is owned by the cultivators. The labor on the land is not collective labor, but individual labor, and the fruits of its labor will only affect the income of the cultivators, so the enthusiasm for labor is guaranteed; But privatization can significantly increase farmers' motivation to open up land, because the fields opened up are privately owned, not collective.

3. The transformation of state-owned ownership into private ownership is a very long historical process; Probably from the middle of the Spring and Autumn Period, to the Qin State Reform Law was affirmed in the form of a decree. The transformation of state-owned ownership into private ownership is not carried out for the sake of civilization progress, but should be regarded as the need of society. In the past, the unit yield of land was relatively fixed for a long time, and as the population grew, more food was needed, and more land was needed, and private ownership was obviously more conducive to the reclamation of new land than public ownership.

Fourth, the current state ownership system is a system formed by the redistribution of social wealth at the time of the founding of the country, and this system should be the progress of civilization. 1. It doesn't regress productivity. 2. It is an equal distribution of social wealth, although it cannot be absolutely average, but it is also a relative average, which is beneficial to the laborers at the bottom of the society, who account for the vast majority of the population.

The superiority of this system is now less conspicuous, because the dominance of agriculture in the national economy is long gone, and it has been subordinated to industry.

Things are different now. Moreover, in China's 2,000-year-old world, true private ownership has never been practiced at all. The reason for the success of the Qin State reform was that it conformed to the historical trend of the reform of labor relations at that time.

At that time, it was not only the Qin State that implemented similar changes in the Qin State. Even in developed countries such as Europe and the United States, the elements of state ownership also occupy a considerable proportion, and the good and bad cannot be distinguished simply by the form of ownership.

You can give it a try.

It is difficult to explain that private ownership cannot solve the problem of land annexation, and public ownership cannot solve the problem of production enthusiasm, such as the most prominent problem of agriculture, agriculture and rural areas.

The system is different, and it can't be compared.

It was the Shang Dynasty Reform Law that abolished the Jingtian system (the Jingtian system was state-owned land), recognized private ownership of land, and allowed land to be bought and sold freely. The fact that land can be bought and sold freely marks the establishment of private ownership.

Abandoned Jingtian and Kaiqian Mo explained: The state ownership of land in the slave society of the Zhou Dynasty was abolished, and the private ownership of land by the landlord class was developed. It was a feudal agrarian system, and since then, Chinese agriculture has moved towards a self-sufficient small-scale peasant economy.

Only Dong Zhongshu is an isolated proof of private land, Yunmeng Qin Jian, and Qingchuan Qin Jian all record the state's grant of land, and even if the Qin State does not attach importance to commerce, there are still many historical records of commodity trading, but there is no record of land buying and selling privately

Shifting from the ** economy to the state-owned economy is the East and East in the theory of salt and iron.

Private ownership of land is contrary to its ideology.

It should be, you can buy and sell it privately.

The replacement of feudal society is, simply put, the replacement of a landlord by a landlord. The genius of the current land system is the separation of tenure and ownership. Ownership belongs to the state and collectives, that is, state-owned land and collective land, and the peasants only have the right to use.

Such a law prevented the concentration of land with the laws of the market, creating a new class of landlords and landless peasants.

But such a system also has drawbacks. For example, there are 10 farmers with limited land, 2 are good at growing grain, 2 are good at growing vegetables, 2 are good at raising pigs, and 4 are good at starting their own businesses.

In such a situation, the good grain growers want more land to grow food, but the land of the migrant workers does not play a role. What should we do if we concentrate idle land to grow food, but we can't annex land? That is, the land of the migrant workers is handed over to the people who grow grain to plant, but the ownership is still with the migrant workers.

In short, there is no mistake about land annexation.

The fact that land is owned by the state and that it is not allowed to be bought and sold privately is a fundamental measure to prevent land annexation and peasants losing their land and becoming displaced people.