Shunzhi is the illegitimate son of Hyozhuang and Dolgon

What evidence do you have that Shunzhi Ten and 2 of them were illegitimate children?

In the official history, Empress Xiaozhuang Wen and Dolgon are uncles and sisters-in-law. Zhang Huangyan wrote a poem called "Jianyi Palace Ci". The poem says:

Shangshou tendon is a joint respect, and the Cining Palace is rotten. The spring official entered the new ceremony yesterday, and the big gift was to celebrate the marriage of the Queen Mother. Zhang Huangyan was a person in the Shunzhi period, and the reigning queen mother at that time was "Empress Xiaozhuang Wen".

And the poem "great gift to meet the queen mother's marriage" makes people naturally think of Empress Xiaozhuang Wen, and immediately, people think of the title of "imperial father" of Dolgon. He chased after the wind and thought that Empress Xiaozhuang Wen was married to the regent Dorgon. Later, many literati and artists took advantage of this to hype.

hyped up the saying "the queen mother married". But there is not a single word in the official history to record this matter.

It should be said that Empress Xiaozhuang Wen is just a "sister-in-law" who keeps her duty, and Dolgon is just an ordinary "little uncle" for the following reasons:

First, although it is said that the Manchus have the custom that after the death of the elder brother, the sister-in-law can marry the younger brother. However, since the Qing army entered the customs, culture, thoughts, behaviors, etc., were once influenced by Han culture. The sister-in-law marrying the brother-in-law has long evolved from a matter of course to a big rebellion.

As a member of the royal family, it is impossible for Dolgon to marry the widow of his brother Huang Taiji as his wife.

Second, the loading in the "Qing History Manuscript" is very detailed. Even a Fujin and a stillborn child will not hesitate to ink and record it in detail. If there is really a "Queen Mother Marrying", how can it not be recorded?

Third, except for the saying "the queen mother married", there have been no incidents of brother-in-law marrying sisters-in-law in the Qing Dynasty royal family since then. This is enough to show that the Qing Dynasty royal family has always adhered to its duty and has no such ugly habit at all.

Fourth, many wild histories say that when the "Queen Mother marries", there is a holy decree to announce to the world. But what about the Holy Decree? From ancient times to the present, no one has seen it. The museum also has no collection, and that's not enough to prove it!

Fifth, Yeshi said that Empress Xiaozhuang Wen was blatantly married. Just imagine, if it is really Dolgon and Empress Xiaozhuang Wen, they are in love. can only be sneaky, so blatant, doesn't it make the world laugh and be generous?

In addition, at that time, the Qing Dynasty had just entered the Central Plains, and the regime was not stable. In case someone uses the "Queen Mother to marry" to say that the Qing Dynasty was barbaric, it is a big rebellion. What about rebellion?

To sum up, Empress Xiaozhuang Wen and Dolgon are really a pair of ordinary uncles and sisters-in-law, and nothing else!

Shunzhi should be Dolgon's son, and Xiaozhuang has long had a leg.

Fu Lin is not the son of Dorgon, but the son of the second emperor of the Qing Empire: Huang Taiji.

Dolgon was the fourteenth son of Nurhachi.

Huang Taiji is the 8th son of Nurhachi.

Fulin (Shunzhi) is the 9th son of Huang Taiji.

Therefore, Shunzhi called Dolgon the fourteenth uncle (also called his imperial father, King Amma).

Uncle-nephew relationship, Dolgon is Shunzhi's fourteenth uncle.

It's not paternity.