How to distinguish between there and no, please analyze it from a philosophical point of view?

The first is to set up a concept of "being" or "being" in the human brain that can be confirmed by sensory perception. Then, in reality, we use our senses (such as the five senses) to perceive whether the existence or state of things in reality is consistent with the concept and assumption of "being" or "existence" in our hearts. If it is consistent, it is there, and if it is inconsistent, it is not consistent, for example, it is not perceptible.

For example, if there is hot water in the quilt, but if there is hot water, if you touch it with your hand in the cup, it should have a feeling of heat and wetness, if the fact does give people a feeling of heat and wetness (consistent), then there is, if there is no such feeling (inconsistency), there is none.

Case-by-case analysis. Therefore, the distinction between having and not has to be done in a specific time and space. The point we are at is unique in time and space, and it is impossible to exist at the same time.

If it is a large number of analyses, it is to be classified, and a set of haves and haves can also be derived. If you want to analyze the whole, then you need to look at the specific object of the whole, and the results are different. Just by analyzing theoretically there is or is not, infinite solutions or even no solutions.

Being and non-existence are two sides of the same coin, interdependent and inseparable.

Personally, I believe that there is now, that is, there is; But things are impermanent, and eventually they will disappear and become nothing.

The first is to confirm the sensory perception of "concepts" or "beings" in the human brain. Then, in reality with the senses perceives the concept and idea of "being" or "being" in the mind. Whether or not it corresponds to something or state that actually exists, such as facial features, is consistent, and conversely, is not, such as perception.

For example, the hot water inside the quilt, the hot water, the cup to touch with your hands, it should have a hot and humid feeling, and if this really gives a hot and humid (consistent) feeling, that is, if you have this feeling (inconsistent).

Yes, ahead of you; None, on your back.

1. "True philosophy" is what the terminator identifies as good philosophy. For example, "A true philosophy is one that focuses on life. ”

Philosophy is philosophy, there is nothing real and scientific. Philosophy is the ultimate inquiry into the world or things, so no one dares to claim that they are true and others are not real. In addition, science is pragmatic, so science is within the philosophical horizon and not the other way around.

So the term 'philosophy of science' is a bit weird, but what kind of philosophy is the philosophy of science, and what is the philosophy of unscience?

The basic problems of philosophy refer to the fundamental issues that run through all philosophical problems and command and restrict all other problems, and are also the fundamental issues debated by various philosophical schools and trends of thought.

1) Content. The problem of the relationship between thinking and being, which is the basic problem of philosophy, is mainly manifested in two aspects:

On the question of who is the first nature of mind and being, spirit and matter, and who produces whom.

This is the dispute between materialism and idealism in philosophy, also known as the "ontological" problem. Philosophers are divided into two camps according to their question: idealism holds that spirit is primary, primordial; Materialism holds that the natural world is primordial.

On the question of "whether there is identity" between thinking and being.

This is the distinction between agnosticism and agnosticism in philosophy, also known as the "epistemology" problem. The vast majority of philosophers in the history of philosophy have affirmed this question. In addition, there are philosophers who deny the possibility of knowing the world.

2) Commentary. Since the problem of the relationship between thinking and existence, which is the basic issue of philosophy, exists in all human activities, whether or not we can uphold the materialist ontology of the primacy of matter and the secondness of consciousness, whether we can uphold the materialist knowability of consciousness reflecting existence, and whether we can adhere to the theory of active reflection on the basis of practice have become the key to whether we can correctly understand and transform the world. Proceeding from reality, seeking truth from facts, and integrating theory with practice are the fundamental requirements and vivid embodiment of the basic philosophical issues in real life.

Philosophy can be distinguished from concrete nuclear science by ().

a.Studying the method of digging and defeating.

b.Subjects of the study.

c.Systematization.

d.Theorizing.

Correct answer: B

Yes and no, philosophy is man himself.

Human beings are love, wisdom, rationality and sensibility, and Pa Bo Xiang is the exchange of emotion and spring wisdom.

Every human being is a synthesis of contradictions, so humanity itself is philosophy.

Contradiction has particularity(1) The particularity of contradiction refers to the contradiction of things and each aspect of it has its own characteristics. (2) The specific manifestation of the particularity of contradictions: the contradictions of different things have different characteristics, which is the internal reason, or basis, of the reason why things in the world are so different; The contradiction of the same thing has different characteristics in different stages of development, which is the basis for distinguishing different stages of the development process of the same thing. Both sides of the contradiction have their own characteristics.

Specific analysis of specific problems requires us to think about problems, which is the basis for understanding things and the key to solving problems.

How to insist on a specific analysis of specific problems? Insist on contradictory views. Concrete analysis of the particularity of contradictions (specific analysis of contradictions between different things; a specific analysis of the characteristics of different stages of the same thing; Analyze different aspects of the same contradiction in detail).

grasp the law in the movement; Take the initiative. It is necessary to achieve the unity of subjectivity, objectivity, and concrete history.

It can be said that we cannot give a proper definition of "existence" - after all, no matter how we define it, we cannot get out of the quagmire of "circular definition". After thinking about it, I can only say that existence is a collective term for all things that contain energy or the law of Tao (the nature that energy follows to maintain its own stability, equivalent to "spirit").

Existence is divided into objective and subjective - subjective existence refers to the existence of a specific Dao body (a general term for all existences, or a specific existence) that exists only in the Dao Law; Objective existence refers to the existence of a particular Dao body in both the law of Tao and the energy.

Existence is existence; In other words, everything that exists, must exist—if it is not objective, then it is subjective.

For example, "ghosts and gods" only exist in people's consciousness and do not appear in reality, which is a typical subjective existence.

It is important to know that "non-existence" is absolute nothingness, which does not exist in the universe – even in the mind.

The controversy between Zhuangzi and Huizi over the "joy of fish" (see Zhuangzi Qiushui for details) also contains a reflection on "existence": since Huizi said that "the child is not a fish, and the joy of the fish is known", he must know the "joy of fish".

It's like someone asking, "How do you know there's a ghost?" If the person concerned does not know the word "there is a ghost", it must not be expressed—that is, only by knowing the existence of "ghost" (subjective existence) can one think about whether it exists (objective existence).

Normally, unless otherwise specified, the "existence" we are talking about refers only to objective existence, not to subjective existence.

What is Being? In fact, what is being asked is the "to on, to be" itself, and what is being asked is how this "is" is "rising". In the sense of roots, ontology actually "suspends" all concrete beings and their referents in advance, and first asks how it is possible to form the judgment of the relationship between entities, i.e., "is" itself?

The questioning is obviously based on a real "is" rather than a denial of the existence of this "is". That is to say, "is" itself is undoubtedly the basic fact of the "world", and the starting point of philosophy is precisely to be amazed at this basic fact and to establish a self-reliant and self-consistent law for this fact, so the inquiry of "is" naturally leads to the categorical confirmation and stipulation of "is".