Is the 3D display that comes out now really as great as everyone says? 15

In fact, non-flash, as the name suggests, it has very superior characteristics in terms of picture stability, my home is using AOC's non-flashing 3D monitor, its effect is great, the picture is clearer and smoother, the color is more gorgeous, how far away to see, the color is not discounted, a family at home around watching 3D movies is really a very good choice, in fact, the landlord can really consider buying one

What do you want to know? If you want to talk about 3D monitors, it must be better than ordinary monitors, because you can't watch 3D movies with ordinary monitors, and there is no effect on playing 3D games, this is the development of technology, and it is also a visual enjoyment for everyone, and it is not that others say that it is good or bad, and the content that is shown like this, just if you look at it, will it be praised? At this stage, non-flickering 3D displays like AOC, as well as ACER's, are doing very well in this regard, **moderate, and are the most suitable styles for everyone to buy.

In 2011, 3D displays were divided into two main camps: SG (flash) and FPR (non-flash).

The representative brands of pop-up 3D displays are: Samsung, ViewSonic , Asus, BenQ, etc. (** range 2300 yuan - 4000 yuan, excluding glasses).

The representative brands of non-flashing 3D displays are: LG, AOC (using LG panel) (**range 1599 yuan - 2000 yuan, including glasses).

Assembling a 3D computer to consider is not only the 3D display, the choice of the host is also hugely different, the realization of flash 3D technology, relying on the high brush to split the picture, is the time division method to achieve 3D stereo, it also doubles the computing performance requirements of the host, usually the flash 3D host is more than 5000 yuan, and the integrated graphics card is basically unachievable. Non-flash 3D technology realizes 3D through the light separation method, and separates the picture through the polarizing film, so it basically does not rely on the host to achieve 3D stereoscopic view, so the requirements for the host are not high, and the integrated graphics card to the host of tens of thousands can achieve 3D impact output.

In addition, glasses are also a big difference. Because they are all wearable 3D stereoscopic technology (not naked-eye 3D), and the principle of realizing 3D is different, the quality of glasses with flash and non-flash technology is also very different. Flash type needs to buy a separate set of special glasses to achieve 3D, NVIDIA graphics card is required, these are all must-haves, a set of glasses is about 1400 yuan, just a glasses.

If it is not flashed, one or more glasses are included, and any graphics card can achieve 3D as long as it supports DirectX, and the glasses are about 50-80 yuan.

In 2012, the 3D market trend was basically set for FPR non-flash products, and at present, Lenovo and Acer have officially joined the LG non-flash 3D camp (similar to AOC, the purchase of LG's polarized 3D panels for assembly).

At present, there is no naked-eye display, only glasses, and there should be no naked-eye in the next five years, and the main problem cannot be solved.

There are many brands of 3D displays, but in fact, there are only three kinds of technologies, polarization, shutter and NVIDIA 3D Vision (in fact, it can be counted as two, NVIDIA 3D Vision belongs to the shutter.) Polarization and shutter are both developed by their respective display manufacturers, and NVIDIA 3D Vision is developed by graphics card manufacturers. The main differences here are:

**Differences, effect differences, compatibility differences.

**In terms of polarized monitors, the cheapest ones, while the shutter and NVIDIA 3D Vision ones are more expensive.

In terms of effect, the polarized display is poor, and the clarity is halved when viewing 3D, which is not suitable for close viewing. The shutter is the same as NVIDIA 3D Vision.

In terms of compatibility, the polarization and shutter are poor, and you can only watch 3D movies, NVIDIA 3D Vision has the best compatibility, in addition to watching 3D movies, you can also turn on stereo vision for more than 500 3D games.

So, if you want to be cheap, buy a polarized monitor like the ACER GR235. If you want to pursue results and compatibility, then it is recommended that you buy NVIDIA 3D Vision glasses and NVIDIA-certified 3D monitors, such as ACER GD245HQ or Hanvision HS233 or others. If you want a large screen, you can choose a shutter-style Samsung 27-inch.

Of course, it's good with the naked eye, but as for that brand, it's up to you.