Canon Casio Sony which is more worth buying

The Canon is good, the Sony's shell is not hard enough, and the ** color shot is too strong; Casio's average, not up to grade, comprehensive evaluation: Canon is good.

Sony's features ---

The king of appearance, it cannot be denied that Sony's digital products are difficult to match other brands on the market in terms of appearance design.

When it comes to imaging, Sony's machine imaging is decent.

It is easy to use.

After-sales is better. It is suitable for general household users. (Since the acquisition of Kemei, Sony has begun to focus on opening up another larger market).

The features of Canon ---

The hegemon of traditional cameras. It extends its advantages in the field of traditional cameras to the field of digital cameras. It has a large number of loyal fans.

It has mastered the key technology of the important parts of the camera. The product division is relatively fine, and the appearance design also strives to cater to the market.

The ease of operation is average.

After-sales in general. (It is said that it is a little worrying).

Whether you are a photography enthusiast or a general user, you can find the right product.

Features of Casio ---

The exterior design of the Casio camera is comparable to that of the Sony. In terms of operation, it visualizes the function, which is very visual and intuitive. It's also the easiest to use.

It is said that in Japan, Casio is Sony's biggest competitor. But professional cameras are Casio's eternal pain.

After-sales in general. It is suitable for general users to purchase. (Much like a point-and-shoot camera).

Sony's night vision is good.

The screen has 230,000 pixels.

The screens of other machines are around 180,000.

Canon's lens is good.

But the result is a bit pink.

Casio's everyone knows that, too.

The movement it makes is relatively good.

All 3 have both rationality and disadvantages.

So you have to think about it.

You have to like his strengths as well as his weaknesses.

I think it's better to think it's Sony.

Other LCD screens are imported from Sony.

Canon is recommended. Check it out for yourself at Pacific Computer.

Canon A710is has been at the top of the list for 3 consecutive months!

I'm using the A710is right now, and it's really good!

Advantages: 1. Full manual function, shutter priority, aperture priority and automatic fool function can also be selected.

2. Optical image stabilization. The stabilization effect is obvious!

Optical zoom.

4. First-line brand.

5. The natural restoration of color is not exaggerated.

6. Listing is mild. The current price is about 2300 yuan, which is cost-effective.

7. It is very suitable for people who have a certain camera foundation.

Disadvantages: 1. Resin lens, but not in the outermost layer, is not enough to affect the lifespan.

2. There are only 2 aspherical lenses, and the imaging distortion is obvious.

Overall evaluation: The advantages are very prominent, and the disadvantages are basically the common problems of digital cameras, which are worth having. The ideal price is around 2,200 yuan.

Recommended to buy!

Canon is better in the professional field, but the mechanism of civilian cards is better than the cost performance. Recently, I have looked at the parameters·· Select the one that belongs to the most recent.

Canon is the image quality of professional cameras, and Sony is selected for appearance.

In between the two is the card I am going to buy the Z1000 card after the New Year

It should be good.

I bought a Canon, and his performance is very good and mature, which is the most important quality criterion for digital cameras.

Of course Canon, mine is.

Although I say that I want to boycott Japanese products, I still prefer Canon.

DSLR to buy Canon's.

The small camera is casual, it's all about the same.

Just don't buy Japanese.

When shooting Canon or Sony?

Canon's main **soft,Sony's main thing is the appearance,If you buy a DSLR,Of course, choose Canon,But if you use a home card machine,Or recommend Sony,Because the gap is not big,But Sony's machine looks more beautiful and fashionable,Canon and Sony's card machine recommend two to you,Canon ixus105 and Sony W350,Both of these machines are very cost-effective,Very good。

If you're looking for looks, the Sony design is better, it's small, it's convenient, and it's sleek, while the Canon is slightly worse. But Canon's machine is absolutely ***, just like the Nokia in the mobile phone, no jump, Sony's storage is a memory stick, very expensive, I personally recommend Canon, I use Canon, it feels good, it's better to ask more people who have bought it.

This mainly depends on the silver, if you want to play SLR, less silver, Sony is also optional, seriously, you can also shoot a good **, if you have a sufficient budget, then Canon, the above is a SLR camera.

Card machine, I think Canon's G11 is very good, and now with the upgraded G12, it's very good.

Of course, Canon is more professional, and you see that the important news scenes are all using Canon or Nikon professional SLR cameras!

Not a single news ** reporter will use a Sony camera!!

In contrast, Canon is more professional in the field of cameras, and the image quality of its products is also better. Sony's card player is more fashionable, and the SLR is a business that was bought later, and there is still a gap between it and Canon.

In contrast, I recommend buying a Canon one. Canon is trustworthy to make cameras! The one I use is the Canon, which is quite easy to use, and the quality is unquestionable. Sony's reputation is not as good as that of Canon

Small numbers are pretty much the same except for Sony's high-end. Some of Casio's cameras have a very strong battery life, which is one of his selling points, and the rest is just like that.

My brother's classmate bought a Casio, this camera is really nothing good except for its small appearance, the camera is hot after a while, you have to turn it off and wait for it to cool before you can use it, the battery can't make it, it won't last long and it will run out of power, it's very depressing, I recommend you don't buy it, it's useless to just look good. The key depends on its performance, or choose another brand.

Sony has a beautiful appearance, but the disadvantage is that it does not stabilize the image, and some photos look good on the camera, and they are so shaky on the computer. Also, there is no automatic portrait processing.

Canon, Nikon:

1. Uses: Canon's hue is warm, that is, the ** that comes out will be reddish; Nikon's hue is on the cold side, and it will be bluish when it comes out. That is, the scenery is more beautiful with Nikon, and the Canon white is red with the portrait.

2. Preferences: Canon's imaging soft point, Nikon's imaging sharp point. For example, if you take a portrait at the same time, the face of the Canon may look smooth, and Nikon will shoot out the spots and hair strands.

3. Cost-effective: Nikon and Canon are both time-honored brands of digital SLR, and the current market is very transparent.

Which one is better? I said, only those who are suitable for their own use are applauded!!

The body is small, beautiful, and colorful (easy to carry).

Canon and Nikon are more balanced in all respects.

Sony and Casio are not professional cameras, and the cost performance is not high.

Canon pays more attention to low-end machines, Nikon pays more attention to mid-to-high-end, and Canon is better in appearance, so Canon is recommended.

The first choice is Canon Sony I won't say much about the last few If you buy it, you will regret Canon Sony is good I mean the quality Appearance Camera shooting effect Sony has too many patents, so it's okay to make a camera. But Canon is different, I also use Canon for professional cameras, and I have used it for several years, and the results are good, and I have never broken again.

I recommend you to use Canon's.

If you want to use a card machine, Canon, DSLR, Nikon, it seems that you can only choose Canon, listen to me.