The baby born by the husband and wife, but the DNA test is uncle s , so whose baby is it?

I think this baby should be "uncle", after all, the DNA test should not go wrong, if you are skeptical, you can test again.

In fact, this child is the child of his parents, just because the father of the child has the DNA of two people in his body. So when doing IVF, he accidentally chose the genes of his mother and his uncle.

This child is not the couple's biological child, this child is the child born to the wife and uncle, and I think this has a serious impact on the child's development.

I think it should be the couple, and it is very likely that there was a problem with the DNA test, or because the uncle's DNA is very similar to the child's father's DNA, so something went wrong.

The baby is indeed this couple, and the man has no brothers, although the test is so, but there is still the possibility of mutation.

Uncle's, because DNA tests don't lie, unless someone is lying.

Of course, the child belongs to the couple, but the DNA test is indeed the uncle's, which is possible, but the odds are very small.

The main reason is that the father carries the DNA of two people in his body, and the DNA that is passed on to his child is another DNA that does not belong to his own characteristics, so when the child is born, the DNA test of the child is the uncle's. However, his father was the only child in the family.

When you first see this title, you may think that this is a very bloody plot. The mother developed a relationship with the uncle, so the uncle's child was born, and the father inadvertently cuckolded. However, this is not the case.

The couple tried IVF because of their health. The child was indeed born by the mother, and the father had no brothers and was the only child in the family. So even if the DNA shows that it is the uncle's child, the uncle does not exist in the world.

So what is the situation, and why does an uncle who does not exist in the world appear out of thin air?

Actually, it's also a sad thing to talk about my uncle. According to an authoritative organization, the father of the couple carries the DNA of two people. Generally speaking, a person can only carry one piece of DNA on their body.

So this extra piece of DNA is likely to be the father's mother, who was pregnant with twins when she was pregnant. It also means that the father has a twin brother, but the embryo of the twin brother is not fully developed in the womb of the father and mother, and even fuses with the father's DNA, so it leads to the father being born with two copies of DNA. And the embryo of the twin brother, who was not fully developed, died in the womb of his father's mother.

In this case, the uncle ceased to exist. And now the father has passed on his brother's share of DNA to his child, which leads to the child's DNA test, but the result shows that the child is an uncle.

However, the probability of this happening is still very small, and the phenomenon of a person carrying two copies of DNA is even more difficult to occur.

It was reported that the grandmother was twins when she was pregnant, but due to developmental problems, the other embryo did not survive and was chimerated in the father's embryo, so the cause of this.

is because this baby's father is the older brother of the twins, so when he was born, he was born with two copies of his younger brother's genes.

Personally, I think it's just that the genes of two people are fused together, and another gene appears, so this phenomenon is normal.

This is because to a certain extent, the child may be an uncle, so there will be such a situation, I hope the two of them can make the most rational choice.

Because this uncle and this man are twins, and the DNA between the twins is very similar, it is normal for the child's DNA to be the same as that of the uncle.

We all know that if it is a biological child, the DNA must be one's own, and it will definitely be able to detect one's own DNA, because this is very normal, and it is also very common in daily life, and this is the continuation of family affection, because this is a parent-child relationship, and it is also normal in daily life, and it should be like this, but in some special circumstances, there are some people's DNA that is not related to their father, And it doesn't have to be my father's, a couple has a baby, but the DNA test is uncle's, is this situation common? I don't think it's very common, and there are three main reasons.

The first reason is that this situation is very special. If this situation occurs, it is really very special, because such a situation is really rare, and in daily life we are all in the same line, there is nothing to say that their own children are other people's DNA, this is very special, and it is also very abnormal, because such a situation is really unimaginable, and it is also very shocking, it is unlikely to happen, and it can only be in special circumstances. <>

The second reason is that this is relatively rare. This situation is really very rare, because in daily life we are all our own father's DNA, and there is no saying that there is someone else's DNA, because we are in a family relationship, and it is also a biological relationship, so it is said that there will be no such situation, only in rare cases we can have such a situation, and it is very lucky to have such a situation. <>

The third reason is that this situation is not normal. I don't think this situation is normal, because under normal circumstances, we don't have such a situation, and once such a situation occurs, it means that such a situation is abnormal, and such an abnormal situation is rare. <>

All in all, I think this is very rare.

This situation exists, but it is not common, from a medical point of view, because the father and uncle are twins, but in the process of development, the father absorbs the uncle, so the uncle becomes a part of the father, so the DNA of the doll is the uncle's.

It's not common, it's definitely one of the wife's problems, the DNA test is very accurate, and there is no error in the category.

This is very common because the uncle and father are siblings, and the DNA of the two of them is very similar, and if it is twins, the DNA may be the same.

This situation is actually uncommon, and it does not prove that there is none, after all, it is very likely that there is a genetic mutation.

Relatively speaking, this situation is not very common, after all, the genes of two people are passed on to the child, if there is an uncle's DNA, then the child may be the uncle's.

This situation is very uncommon, but when something like this happens, it is estimated that the family is also a little depressed.

Medically speaking, chimerism, this phenomenon is really very good, so we can't believe that there is such a phenomenon, it is really terrible.

This is a very rare case of chimerism in medicine. In other words, this "father" carries the DNA of two people, that is, the embryo of the twin brother did not develop, and it was caused by the fusion with his embryo, and it happened that he passed the DNA of the younger brother to the child.

The mother of this child also has a twin brother in the early stages of pregnancy, but the embryos of this twin brother do not develop, that is, the two fertilized eggs are fused, resulting in the "father" carrying the DNA of two people to be born, and he passes the DNA of the younger brother to the child. That's what happened.

Medically speaking, this is caused by the intrauterine assimilation and phagocytosis of the child's father during the fetal period, which should be the existence of twins during the father's fetal period, one of them is unable to compete for nutrients because of stunted growth and is absorbed by the other, resulting in the occurrence of the child's father's integrated double DNA, which can be said to be very rare.

It is because the father had a twin brother before he was born, but it was absorbed in the stomach, and the father had two chromosomes, so this situation occurred.

It's because grandma had two children when she was pregnant, but in the process of development, the father absorbed the uncle, so the uncle became a part of the father, so the doll's DNA is the same as the uncle.

This is because the child was obtained through IVF, and it is likely that there was a certain discrepancy in the DNA test, so this situation occurred.

It may be that my mother has an improper relationship with my uncle, and my uncle is not in this family**, in fact, he is alive.

The father of this child is a rare sign of chimerism, that is, he was originally a pair of twins when he was in his mother's womb, but for some reason the younger brother's embryo did not develop and fused with his embryo. When he had a child, he passed on his brother's genes, resulting in the DNA test of the child born to his brother.

After many years of marriage, and as they grew older, the couple chose to do IVF, but they didn't expect it to succeed once. But what I didn't expect was that the blood type of the baby who was successfully born did not match the father's, and the greatest probability was that it was "uncle". The father of the baby was an only child and had no brothers.

After the doctor's analysis and identification, this situation is a chimera case, the baby's father has two people's DNA in his body, it may be that his mother is pregnant with twins, but the other one is not well developed and fused with him, so this father carries the DNA of 2 people, but this IVF only passed the DNA of the other embryo to the son.

1. I was accidentally "green" by myself. A couple who have been childless for many years chose IVF to conceive, conceive and successfully give birth to a baby. When testing DNA, it is found that the child born by the mother does not match the father, and it may be that the child is an uncle.

But this father is an only child, otherwise this "uncle" would not be able to wash it away if he fell into the Yellow River. The dad carried the DNA of 2 people and passed only one of them to the child.

Second, the world is so big that there are no surprises. Dad's DNA condition is actually the phenomenon of two fertilized eggs fusing into one, and the probability of this happening is between 10% and 15%. When the embryo is developing, it is necessary to grab resources in the mother's body, because one of them does not develop well, there is a phenomenon of fusion, and the fused one leaves a part of the DNA, which can be regarded as a manifestation of survival of the fittest.

3. With a little more trust, love can continue. Many couples will do DNA testing after giving birth, and when the results are different from what they think, don't rush to investigate or hold the other party accountable. Because to become a husband and wife, you should give each other enough trust, because once the seeds of doubt are there, it is easy to take root in your heart.

Therefore, when the DNA identification results are not very satisfactory, you should first find a hospital for confirmation, and then analyze together to find out the cause.

Because the father of this child was originally twins, but when the womb was grown, the fittest was eliminated, and his uncle was eliminated, but the strong genes remained.

Test Answers: a. From the information in the table, it can be seen that genes I and II are both present in the mother's body, and there is only one of these two genes in the offspring, so genes I and II are most likely to be located on a pair of homologous chromosomes, so a is correct B. The genetic characteristics of genes are that the father passed them on to his two daughters, not to his sons, so they are most likely to be located on the X chromosome, so B is correct C, genes and The genetic situation of genes and is the same, and they appear at the same time, so the most likely genes and are located on one chromosome, so C is correct D. There is no in the chart, so it may be located on the Y chromosome and cannot be judged, so D is wrong Therefore, D

There is no other reason except for the red apricot coming out of the wall.

No way! It's also a paternity test!

Uncle took this woman's xxoo one step ahead!!

Then your dad is the "King Next Door".

Paternity test? If so, how does it compare to his uncle's DNA?

If not, there may be a problem with the monitoring.

It is recommended to go to a big hospital.