How would you deal with the rude demands of the vulnerable?

Sympathize when you should sympathize, don't sympathize when you shouldn't, respect when you should respect, don't respect when you shouldn't, for example: if an old man insults someone in order to get a seat, this practice should not be respected, but should be blamed, a person is poor because of long-term gambling, this behavior is also difficult to be sympathized, the weak are different, the same person behaves differently at different times, and the evaluation of bystanders should also vary from person to person, from behavior to behavior.

I think that for the disadvantaged, we should sympathize when we should sympathize with them, and respect them when we should respect them, but if they are rude and not within the scope of our help, I think we have the right to refuse.

Maybe our perception of the disadvantaged group is different, we think that the disadvantaged group may not be the disadvantaged group, or we do not think that we are the disadvantaged group, so the most important thing is how we should treat them, whether they should be treated normally, and they make a choice, ask us how to treat, the abnormal treatment here I think the more appropriate understanding is not help, rescue, or even mercy, and normal treatment does not mean to ignore and go with the flow. A more appropriate explanation might be to provide more opportunities for self-determination for those we perceive to be vulnerable.

If you have a strong sense of compassion, of course you can reciprocate with deep sympathy. Because after all, what the sky gives them is different from what it gives to ordinary people, which leads to some reluctant changes in their lives. But if you don't have spontaneous sympathy, you just feel that this is a normal phenomenon, a manifestation of samsara.

All people are created equal, respect for others means putting them on an equal footing with themselves, and sympathy is the feeling of care and understanding for the group that is disadvantaged compared to themselves.

I feel that respect is a rational emotion, while compassion is emotional. There is no way for a civilized world to demand "tender compassion", "compassionate compassion" and the like from all people. However, a society that has developed to a certain extent will evolve a rational constraint on the distance and relationship between people, which we can call "respect", which will be easier to do in comparison.

I think we should be brave enough to say no if it is an unreasonable request, and we should give us the help we can for the disadvantaged, and I think we have the right to refuse if it is an unreasonable request.

At this time, I think it's okay to have no sympathy, because we have respected them, as long as the feelings are not fake, anything is fine, if it is too rude to ask, it is okay to refuse.

It is better to teach a man to fish than to give him a fish.