Recommend me telephoto, X5, S1770, SP600, S2600, L110, FH20, S2900

Like me, this benevolent brother loves to read things on JD.com.

I bought it in 1770 the other day.

First of all, GM, Nikon, Casio can be passed. GM is a manufacturer that even makes aircraft parts, no.

It's that quality is not good, but it's not a specialty after all. In the same way, Casio is still good at making electronic watches. Nikon's heavy.

The points are all on the SLR, the consumer machine is just an accessory, and the L110 is a fully automatic machine, to put it bluntly, it is stupid.

The melon machine is not suitable for learning photography skills.

In addition, I talked about SP600, I also paid attention to it before I bought it, but in the end I still gave it away, obviously.

Fully automatic machine, not suitable for hand training, no viewfinder, the viewfinder is very important when telephoto, it can be obvious.

Prevent artificial jitter. 1G of body memory is also included in the cost, which is definitely more expensive than you buy a 1G card!

Finally, it's between 2600 and 1770, and to be honest, there is no difference between the two, and there are 3 times more focal lengths.

If the budget is sufficient, the 2600 is more cost-effective, and if the budget is not sufficient, the 1770 is also very good.

Electronic viewfinder, optical image stabilization CCD displacement stabilization, obviously prevent the jitter of the telephoto, otherwise the telephoto is.

Encumbrance. Full manual mode, fully learn photography skills, pave the way for playing SLR in the future. Most noteworthy.

It's the macro of 1770, which is very nice. Fujifilm's display can't be commendled enough. But in the end**.

I also have to watch it on the computer.

Based on the above, 2600 or 1770 is recommended, which is cost-effective and suitable for practice.

First of all, it is recommended not to buy SP-600, although ** is similar to S1770, but the feel is quite bad, I recommend buying Fuji's, the cost performance is relatively high, I just bought the day before yesterdayS1770, I think it is very good, of course, S2600 is better, but it is only 3x more zoom than S1770, my consideration is the same as yours, I also want to change to SLR after a certain foundation, I have also seen several other cameras, but in the end, I bought S1770 after comprehensive consideration, I hope it can help you!!

Fuji S2900 doesn't seem to be on the market yet,Your few should be Fuji 2600 with the highest playability,S2900 comes out,You can choose this。 Fuji's telephoto machine is still good,In addition to the snowflake door a few days agoS205,Of course, if the funds allow, it is recommended that you go to Fujifilm HS1130 times the light change,You can hit the moon,Quite strong。

Personal acquaintance is still Nikon's L110 is a little better.

For Fuji, Olibus is useless and does not comment directly.

Nikon L110 is a disposable battery randomly, about 800 shots, and you will have to match your own No. 7 battery in the future, or buy a No. 7 rechargeable battery and charger. The investment in the later stage is slightly larger. But L110, the pixel is high, the imaging is relatively sharp, and the telephoto is also sharp.

The wide-angle and telephoto are good, the body shape is similar to a DSLR, and the handheld feeling is good.

But there is no dial, and the switching mode is all menu-adjusted. Regardless of the battery, it is worth entering.

L110 is good, about 1750 yuan, effective pixels: 10 million Image sensor size: (1 inch optical zoom:

15x equivalent to 35mm focal length: 28-420 Display size: 3 inches Image stabilization:

Optical image stabilization. The only drawback is the use of AA batteries Others are relatively second-tier brands, after-sales service and other factors, not recommended

L110 is good, about 1750 yuan, effective pixels: 10 million Image sensor size: (1 inch optical zoom:

15x equivalent to 35mm focal length: 28-420 Display size: 3 inches Image stabilization:

Optical image stabilization. The only drawback is the use of AA batteries Others are relatively second-tier brands, after-sales service and other factors, not recommended

The 2600 is the most feature-rich and powerful.

The portability is the smallest in 1770, but I personally think it's not good-looking.

L110 is also OK, but the light change is not as much as S2600.

In fact, for photographic equipment, each brand is about the same, and the best may be Leica's, but that** is not outrageous... Therefore, if you want to choose a camera, you should analyze the characteristics of each brand, and then decide according to your preferences.

Today's card machines, Nikon and Canon are not very remarkable. In particular, the menu of the Canon is still in a state of "I can't write without reading the explanation".

Most of Olympus' machines have excellent imaging, realistic color reproduction, and wide-angle lens focal lengths. But there are two drawbacks: one is to insist on using the XD card, which is simply "a dead end to the black", and sooner or later it will fail; The other is that the reaction speed is too slow, and Kodak and Sony tied for the "slowest champion" back then, and now Sony has "taken off the hat", and these two "difficult brothers" are still "getting along".

So I'm the least cold;

I've always thought that the biggest advantage of Fujifilm digital cameras is not the "X-generation Super CCD" they advertise, but their outstanding auto white balance function! Among all digital cameras, including DSLRs, Fujifilm has been able to faithfully reproduce the light and atmosphere of the setting of the sunset! In addition, its "analog inverted film color" and "large dynamic range" are eye-catching; The weak point is that it consumes more electricity;

The parameters you said are indeed similar,If you have to row,S1770>SP600>L110

These are all consumer telephoto types, and it is clear that Fujifilm is an expert in making telephoto.

The Fujifilm is more cost-effective in the telephoto camera, and the Fujifilm machine has a smiley face automatic monitoring and shooting function.

As for 1770 or 2600, 1770 is 15 times the light change, 2600 is 18 times, and other parameters are similar, if it is not professional photography, I think 1770 can fully meet your requirements. I'm just using 1770, two months old.

Fujifilm S1770 is good, my colleague bought one, 15x optical zoom. **1580.

Nikon portraits are good, and it is recommended that you use Nikon.

Well, I think the Fujifilm 1770 is pretty good. I bought one a few days ago.

Nikon L110 is cost-effective, the performance is good, the imaging is good, the texture of Fuji's two models is not good, the Olympus SP600 style is good-looking, and the imaging should not be as good as Nikon... So it is recommended to buy L110

S1770 I'm using it and it's very practical.