Is Celeron 530 enough, and what generation is Celeron G530?

It is a processor for laptops. It should be called Celeron M530, this processor is a mobile version of the Core 2 core, with a high frequency and high performance (Celeron M530, Core Core 2, 65nm, main frequency, front-side bus 533MHz, L2 cache 1024KB). The previous Celeron M processor was a simplified version of the Pentium M processor (for example, the Celeron M300 series was a simplified version of the Pentium M700 series); The current Celeron M processor is a single-core version of the notebook Core dual-core processor (the Celeron M400 series is the single-core version of the notebook Core 1 dual-core processor, and the Celeron M500 series is the single-core version of the notebook Core 2 dual-core processor), because now the Pentium M processor (P7) is discontinued, the notebook high-end processor is the Core 1 2 dual-core (Core), the notebook low-end processor is the Celeron M single-core (C7), and the current Celeron M processor core is Core, So the performance is stronger than the old Pentium M processor.

The performance of the Pentium M processor is stronger than the Ben 4M processor (the Ben 4 processor used in the notebook is called the Ben 4M processor, and the general application of the Ben 4M processor is enough), so the current Sai 7M processor (Celeron M500 series and M400 series) is definitely enough.

Don't buy sheep. With E2140, E2160, E2180

The price is not much different.

But the performance is significantly higher.

Don't use Celeron. In fact, the computer is generally enough for Ben 4, and the Core 2 is not needed....Ben 4 is also much cheaper now.

It's completely enough, you're not running large software, 530 is completely enough.

It should be enough, don't worry about adding more.

Released in 2011, it belongs to the second-generation Celeron G with a 1155-pin architecture.

The performance of the notebook is not good, and few notebooks can fully bring out the performance of the CPU.

Especially in games, because the graphics card of the notebook is not as good as the desktop, what does it have to do with the processor? Recognized to play games with a look at the graphics card! The above is the comment, let's get to the point:

In terms of performance, Celeron M530 is much stronger than Ben 4 Celeron because: 1, Celeron M530 is a Core 2-core mobile processor.

It is a simplified version of the mobile Pentium T2000 series (mobile Ben7 processor) dual-core grinding processor, and its architecture and execution efficiency are far stronger than those of Ben4, not to mention Celeron. Celeron M530 is a simple mobile Ben 7 processor (Celeron belongs to the Pentium series products). Ben 7 is definitely stronger than Ben, and the performance of the processor is determined by the architecture, main frequency, front-side bus, and L2 cache.

Celeron M530 is the architecture of the Core 2, Celeron is the NB architecture of the Ben 4, and Celeron M530 is strong; Celeron M530 front-end bus is 533MHz, Celeron front-end bus is 400MHz, Celeron M530 strong rotten only; Celeron M530 L2 cache is 1024K, Celeron L2 cache is 128K, Celeron M530 strong; 3. And the thermal power consumption of mobile processors is very low, which is much more stable than desktop processors. If you compare the processor alone: the mobile Celeron M530 processor is much stronger than the desktop Celeron processor.

To add:The mobile Celeron processor of the pen blind notebook,The architecture is the NB architecture of the mobile Ben4,The main frequency is,The front-end bus is400MHz,The L2 cache is256K,The performance is stronger than the desktop Celeron processor,But compared with the Celeron M530,It's still much worse。